cs.LGFeb 19, 2026

Provably Explaining Neural Additive Models

Authors: Shahaf Bassan, Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Tobias Ladner, Volkan Şahin, Jan Kretinsky, Matthias Althoff, Guy Katz

Organizations: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel · Technical University of Munich, Germany · Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Abstract

Despite significant progress in post-hoc explanation methods for neural networks, many remain heuristic and lack provable guarantees. A key approach for obtaining explanations with provable guarantees is by identifying a cardinally-minimal subset of input features which by itself is provably sufficient to determine the prediction. However, for standard neural networks, this task is often computationally infeasible, as it demands a worst-case exponential number of verification queries in the number of input features, each of which is NP-hard. In this work, we show that for Neural Additive Models (NAMs), a recent and more interpretable neural network family, we can efficiently generate explanations with such guarantees. We present a new model-specific algorithm for NAMs that generates provably cardinally-minimal explanations using only a logarithmic number of verification queries in the number of input features, after a parallelized preprocessing step with logarithmic runtime in the required precision is applied to each small univariate NAM component. Our algorithm not only makes the task of obtaining cardinally-minimal explanations feasible, but even outperforms existing algorithms designed to find the relaxed variant of subset-minimal explanations - which may be larger and less informative but easier to compute - despite our algorithm solving a much more difficult task. Our experiments demonstrate that, compared to previous algorithms, our approach provides provably smaller explanations than existing works and substantially reduces the computation time. Moreover, we show that our generated provable explanations offer benefits that are unattainable by standard sampling-based techniques typically used to interpret NAMs.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables7 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. FAME: Formal Abstract Minimal Explanation for Neural Networks

    Mar 11, 2026Ryma Boumazouza, Raya Elsaleh, Melanie Ducoffe +2Neural Network InterpretabilityAbductive Reasoning

  2. Probabilistic Linear Explanations

    Sep 16, 2026Frederic Koriche, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Chi TranExplainable Artificial IntelligenceMixed-Integer QP

  3. Neuron Activation-based Computation of Logical Explanations for Deep Neural Networks

    Sep 12, 2026Tomáš Kolárik, Faezeh Labbaf, Fabrizio Leopardi +3Explainable Artificial IntelligenceNeural Network Interpretability