PRECTR-V2:Unified Relevance-CTR Framework with Cross-User Preference Mining, Exposure Bias Correction, and LLM-Distilled Encoder Optimization
Organizations: Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, China
Abstract
In search systems, effectively coordinating the two core objectives of search relevance matching and click-through rate (CTR) prediction is crucial for discovering users' interests and enhancing platform revenue. In our prior work PRECTR, we proposed a unified framework to integrate these two subtasks,thereby eliminating their inconsistency and leading to mutual benefit.However, our previous work still faces three main challenges. First, low-active users and new users have limited search behavioral data, making it difficult to achieve effective personalized relevance preference modeling. Second, training data for ranking models predominantly come from high-relevance exposures, creating a distribution mismatch with the broader candidate space in coarse-ranking, leading to generalization bias. Third, due to the latency constraint, the original model employs an Emb+MLP architecture with a frozen BERT encoder, which prevents joint optimization and creates misalignment between representation learning and CTR fine-tuning. To solve these issues, we further reinforce our method and propose PRECTR-V2. Specifically, we mitigate the low-activity users' sparse behavior problem by mining global relevance preferences under the specific query, which facilitates effective personalized relevance modeling for cold-start scenarios. Subsequently, we construct hard negative samples through embedding noise injection and relevance label reconstruction, and optimize their relative ranking against positive samples via pairwise loss, thereby correcting exposure bias. Finally, we pretrain a lightweight transformer-based encoder via knowledge distillation from LLM and SFT on the text relevance classification task. This encoder replaces the frozen BERT module, enabling better adaptation to CTR fine-tuning and advancing beyond the traditional Emb+MLP paradigm.
Figures & tables
| Method | AUC | RI | GAUC | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR ( Hosmer Jr et al., 2013 ) | 0.6795 | -29.10% | 0.6347 | -26.6% |
| DNN | 0.7541 | 0.35% | 0.6863 | 1.47% |
| Wide&Deep ( Cheng et al., 2016 ) | 0.7532 | 0.00% | 0.6836 | 0.00% |
| DeepFM ( Guo et al., 2017 ) | 0.7519 | -0.51% | 0.6839 | 0.16% |
| XDeepFM ( Lian et al., 2018 ) | 0.7521 | -0.43% | 0.6843 | -0.29% |
| DIN ( Zhou et al., 2018 ) | 0.7561 | 1.15% | 0.6875 | 2.21% |
| Method | AUC | RI | GAUC | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRECTR | 0.7581 | 0.00% | 0.6892 | 0.00% |
| w/o Cold-Start Relevance Preference Mining | 0.7609 | 1.08% | 0.6908 | 0.85% |
| w/o Relevance Exposure Debias | 0.7658 | 2.98% | 0.6928 | 1.91% |
| w/o LLM-Distilled and CTR-Aligned Encoder | 0.7662 | 3.13% | 0.6927 | 1.85% |
| PRECTR-V2 |
CTR Prediction
Click-through rate (CTR) prediction estimates which ads or items users will click to improve ranking, recommendation, and advertising decisions.
See all 19 papers