Mapping the Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Life Cycle Assessment Using Large Language Models

The interpretation phase of life cycle assessment often lacks structured mechanisms for translating quantified improvement opportunities addressing environmental hotspots into actionable strategic pathways under technological, social, and policy uncertainty. To overcome this limitation, this study introduces a perspective-conditioned retrieval-augmented generation framework for LCA interpretation, where a multi-perspective retrieval and controlled synthesis is incorporated in the artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted LCA. To operationalise large language models in LCA interpretation, a perspective fusion RAG architecture was developed, covering academic, industry, public discourse, and European union (EU) funding datasets. Our approach comprises three steps: (1) a scenario anchor defining system boundaries and decarbonization targets, (2) a set of perspective-specific micro-queries with constrained retrieval, and (3) a neutral synthesis step integrating only ledger-stored outputs without further retrieval. The framework is demonstrated through a hydrogen-enabled diesel reduction use case in an Italian apple production facility using GPT-5 nano as the reasoning model. Overall, the structured retrieval and constrained synthesis are designed to mitigate the risk of hallucination while preserving cross-domain diversity. The approach presented can support more disciplined translation of impact results into strategic pathways and opens up new avenues for the use of advanced AI tools in LCA studies, particularly those focused on technologies that could be deployed at scale. This proof-of-concept demonstrates how AI-assisted, evidence-grounded interpretation can support implementation-oriented decision-making beyond conventional LCA studies.

Large language models (LLMs) and AI-enabled software increasingly participate in systematic-review decisions, yet the information needed to audit these workflows is reported inconsistently. We analyze SciLitBench, a corpus of 888 review-automation papers with 14,726 annotations, to characterize changes in methods, review-stage use, evaluation and reported limitations. Automation has shifted toward LLM- and software-facing workflows, including stages that can alter the evidence base. Since 2023, 38.0% of software/product papers reported no evaluation, compared with 9.3% of LLM papers. Reporting coverage increased with LLM workflow complexity, yet 52% of positive-only LLM evaluations still reported an unmet reliability or performance requirement. From these patterns, we introduce PRISMA-LLM, an empirically grounded framework separating implementation disclosure from consequence-sensitive evaluation and limitation reporting.

Proper accounting of the energy requirements and environmental impact of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is necessary for researchers, developers, policy makers, and users to assess the barriers to building systems at scale. With the growing complexity of pipelines and underlying infrastructure needed to develop and deploy AI systems, previous approaches for evaluating AI efficiency which focus on the costs of a single training run or an individual inference prediction are no longer sufficient. In this position paper, we enunciate the need for applying life cycle assessment to evaluate the costs of the machine learning model development and deployment pipeline to properly account for the required resources and downstream impact. Life cycle assessments enable the incorporation of costs across the full life cycle of an AI system and its underlying infrastructure, from the embodied costs associated with the physical computing hardware through the operational costs in training and inference.