Texterial: A Text-as-Material Interaction Paradigm for LLM-Mediated Writing

While LLMs have transformed text generation, standard chat-and-canvas interfaces often reduce human authoring to quite passive supervision, causing review fatigue, over-reliance on AI, and the sidelining of the human role in long-form, source-grounded writing. Prior systems typically address isolated writing phases, leaving comprehensive end-to-end human-LLM collaboration largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce CoWriter, a proactive agentic scheme that adapts expert human (co-)authoring methodologies from cognitive science to flexibly steer the entire writing workflow while actively encouraging the user to engage. In an exploratory user study, compared to a standard LLM baseline, authors using CoWriter better expressed their perspectives and maintained a higher sense of document ownership, supported quantitatively by $2.2\times$ more successful agent engagements. Furthermore, external reader judges rated the resulting texts higher in "human touch" qualities like storytelling and integrating unique personal experiences. Overall, our results demonstrate that proactively engaging users through established human practices is beneficial for effective LLM-supported co-authoring, providing useful methodologies, techniques and insights for future research on collaborative agents.

Material generation should produce not only an appearance, but also the rules that construct it. We introduce MatLoom, a compact, layer-oriented language for text-to-material generation with pretrained language models. Each program composes alpha-masked layers whose shared spatial expressions define coverage and physically based rendering (PBR) channels, making dependencies between patterns, color, and relief explicit. A standalone interpreter evaluates the program into material maps, while the source retains named fields and layer parameters for subsequent authoring. Without task-specific fine-tuning, our pipeline uses parser-guided repair and preview-based critique to revise material designs, then searches noise seeds while keeping each candidate's remaining source fixed. On a curated benchmark of 141 prompts evaluated with six backbones, our best-performing configuration achieves higher mean scores than three diffusion baselines on all four flat-layout prompt-alignment metrics. Its initial programs already exceed all three baselines on mean BLIPScore, before critique or seed search. Retained programs have a median length of 21 lines when pooled across backbones. In a blind four-way comparison involving 30 participants and 20 prompts, our renders receive 59.2% of choices, compared with 19.3% for the most-preferred baseline. Compact executable programs thus offer a way to generate prompt-aligned materials while retaining their construction as part of the asset.

Large language model writing interfaces often make users steer outputs by repeatedly articulating desired changes in natural language. Yet writers may recognize useful stylistic directions only after seeing alternatives, making revision recall-heavy. We present DimSteer, an authoring interface that samples prompt-local completions, discovers high-variance activation-space axes of variation, labels them, and exposes them as sliders with pole previews, diff comparison, and reset controls. Users can manipulate discovered dimensions, reducing the need to reformulate prompts for each stylistic adjustment. In a within-subjects study with 16 participants against a matched prompt-only baseline, DimSteer reduced mental demand, effort, and frustration while preserving comparable perceived success. Participants valued the surfaced dimensions, yet 15 of 16 disagreed that they would have thought to request the same changes in a prompt. Results suggest prompt-local controls can shift LLM authoring from recall-based prompting toward recognition-based exploration and direct manipulation, while preserving prompting for open-ended edits.