cs.ROMar 2, 2026

A Safety-Aware Shared Autonomy Framework with BarrierIK Using Control Barrier Functions

Authors: Berk Guler, Kay Pompetzki, Yuanzheng Sun, Simon Manschitz, Jan Peters

Organizations: Technical University of Darmstadt · Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH · German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) · Robotics Institute Germany (RIG) · Centre for Cognitive Science

Abstract

Shared autonomy blends operator intent with autonomous assistance. In cluttered environments, linear blending can produce unsafe commands even when each source is individually collision-free. Many existing approaches model obstacle avoidance through potentials or cost terms, which only enforce safety as a soft constraint. In contrast, safety-critical control requires hard guarantees. We investigate the use of control barrier functions (CBFs) at the inverse kinematics (IK) layer of shared autonomy, targeting post-blend safety while preserving task performance. Our approach is evaluated in simulation on representative cluttered environments and in a VR teleoperation study comparing pure teleoperation with shared autonomy. Across conditions, employing CBFs at the IK layer reduces violation time and increases minimum clearance while maintaining task performance. In the user study, participants reported higher perceived safety and trust, lower interference, and an overall preference for shared autonomy with our safety filter. Additional materials available at https://berkguler.github.io/barrierik.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Mar 7, 2026

Is Your Safe Controller Actually Safe? A Critical Review of CBF Tautologies and Hidden Assumptions

This tutorial provides a critical review of the practical application of Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) in robotic safety. While the theoretical foundations of CBFs are well-established, I identify a recurring gap between the mathematical assumption of a safe controller's existence and its constructive realization in systems with input constraints. I highlight the distinction between candidate and valid CBFs by analyzing the interplay of system dynamics, actuation limits, and class-K functions. I further show that some purported demonstrations of safe robot policies or controllers are limited to passively safe systems, such as single integrators or kinematic manipulators, where safety is already inherited from the underlying physics and even naive geometric hard constraints suffice to prevent collisions. By revisiting simple low-dimensional examples, I show when CBF formulations provide valid safety guarantees and when they fail due to common misuses. I then provide practical guidelines for constructing realizable safety arguments for systems without such passive safety. A crowd-navigation simulation study further illustrates that CBF-derived reward shaping in reinforcement learning can improve empirical behavior without establishing formal safety. The goal of this tutorial is to bridge the gap between theoretical guarantees and actual implementation, supported by an open-source interactive web demonstration that visualizes these concepts intuitively.
Sep 11, 2026

VertexCBF: Improving Neural Control Barrier Functions via Vertex-Restricted Control Search

As the number of autonomous robots continues to grow, safety becomes increasingly important. Control barrier functions (CBFs) provide a theoretically grounded framework for ensuring safety, but existing design methods often face limitations in effectiveness, scalability, or interpretability, and may result in overly conservative safe sets. In this paper, we propose VertexCBF, a framework for learning neural CBFs in a scalable, systematic, and explainable way. We approximate the stationary Hamilton--Jacobi value function using a neural network trained via a combination of physics-informed and sparsely supervised learning. By exploiting control-affine dynamics and a convex polytope control set, under which the Hamiltonian is maximized at the control vertices, we efficiently generate supervision points via GPU-parallel vertex-restricted tree search, while a residual architecture guarantees that the learned CBF is never larger than the specified constraint function. We evaluate the method on 15 systems and compare it against relevant baselines, showing that it reliably recovers large safe sets where the baselines are conservative or fail completely. In addition, we perform a hardware experiment in which a mobile robot safely avoids pedestrians using a neural CBF trained with our method.
Sep 13, 2026

BIG-CBF: Behavior-Imagination-Guided Control Barrier Function with Shared Uncertainty for Mobile Robot Navigation

Control barrier functions (CBFs) provide a mathematically grounded framework for enforcing local collision-avoidance constraints in autonomous mobile robots, commonly through optimization-based safety filters. However, a minimum-intervention CBF filter lacks task-level maneuver awareness and may fail to select a productive avoidance direction when multiple distinct maneuvers are locally viable, leading to safe but stalled behavior in geometrically ambiguous environments. This paper presents BIG-CBF, Behavior-Imagination-Guided Control Barrier Function with shared uncertainty, a two-rate navigation architecture that separates low-rate maneuver selection from high-rate safety filtering. Over a short horizon, six closed-loop feedback behaviors are imagined and evaluated using analytic CBF compatibility together with a lightweight objective accounting for task progress, freezing, smoothness, and switching. To reduce planning-execution mismatch, the imagination and execution layers share consistent uncertainty sources for relative-motion delay, obstacle prediction, zero-order-hold motion, and command-execution residuals, while a hard CBF remains the final safety authority. In a 3,600-episode comparative benchmark across nine scenarios, BIG-CBF achieves the highest overall task success rate of 99.78% while substantially reducing downstream CBF intervention. On a physical omnidirectional robot with onboard Jetson Orin Nano computation, BIG-CBF completes all 15 evaluation runs without a recorded contact event. Matched hardware comparisons against the non-shared variant further show lower CBF intervention energy and activation frequency, supporting improved consistency between maneuver selection and safety-critical execution.