Generalized Per-Agent Advantage Estimation for Multi-Agent Policy Optimization
Authors: Seongmin Kim, Giseung Park, Woojun Kim, Jiwon Jeon, Seungyul Han, Youngchul Sung
Organizations: KAIST Daejeon, Korea · University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada · Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA · UNIST Ulsan, Korea
In this paper, we propose a novel framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning that enhances sample efficiency and coordination through accurate per-agent advantage estimation. The core of our approach is Generalized Per-Agent Advantage Estimator (GPAE), which employs a per-agent value iteration operator to compute precise per-agent advantages. This operator enables stable off-policy learning by indirectly estimating values via action probabilities, eliminating the need for direct Q-function estimation. To further refine estimation, we introduce a double-truncated importance sampling ratio scheme. This scheme improves credit assignment for off-policy trajectories by balancing sensitivity to the agent's own policy changes with robustness to non-stationarity from other agents. Experiments on benchmarks demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing approaches, excelling in coordination and sample efficiency for complex scenarios.
Figures & tables
Advantage
Credit
Off-Policy
Additional
Assignment
Bias( λ=1 )
GAE
No
No
No
COMA
1-step
No
No
DAE
n -step
No
Yes
GPAE (Ours)
n -step
Yes
No
Table 1. Comparison of MAPG advantage estimators
Figure 1. 1(a) Advantage gap ΔA indicating how strongly each method penalizes the anomalous agent. Higher ΔA means more effective credit assignment against the “stop” action. 1(b) Average win rates, illustrating overall learning stability and performance. (a) Advantage gap \DeltaA indicating how strongly each method penalizes the anomalous agent. Higher \DeltaA means more effective credit assignment against the “stop” action. (b) Average win rates, illustrating overall learning stability and performance.
Figure 2. Off-policy correction comparisons in the SMAX-1s1z task. 2(a) Distance from true ρi , 2(b) Distance from joint true ρ , 2(c) Gap between (a) and (b), 2(d) Final performance. Legend is shared across all plots. DT-ISR demonstrates the lowest gap Δci and the highest performance. Off-policy correction comparisons in the SMAX-1s1z task. \subref{subfig:dt_diff1} Distance from true ρi, \subref{subfig:dt_diff2} Distance from joint true ρ, \subref{subfig:dt_diff_diff} Gap between (a) and (b), \subref{subfig:dt_performance} Final performance. Legend is shared across all plots. DT-ISR demonstrates the lowest gap \Deltaci and the highest performance.
Figure 3. Illustration of the two evaluation environments. Illustration of the two evaluation environments.
Domain
Task
GPAE (off)
GPAE (on)
MAPPO
DAE
COMA
QMIX
VDN
SMAX
3s5z_vs_3s6z
87.3 ± 3.9
6.1 ± 2.0
2.6 ± 0.7
6.5 ± 2.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.8
0.5 ± 0.4
5m_vs_6m
93.7 ± 1.0
8.8 ± 0.9
3.1 ± 1.8
4.2 ± 2.5
0.3 ± 0.6
3.9 ± 0.6
3.2 ± 1.9
10m_vs_11m
98.5 ± 2.7
47.5 ± 2.8
36.4 ± 2.4
25.0 ± 8.2
1.3 ± 0.3
32.8 ± 0.9
22.6 ± 8.0
6h_vs_8z
99.5 ± 0.1
99.8 ± 0.2
99.0 ± 0.2
98.9 ± 0.1
80.4 ± 4.9
75.3 ± 5.3
96.1 ± 2.6
smacv2_5_units
81.0 ± 1.3
80.0 ± 1.7
75.2 ± 0.9
77.1 ± 1.2
54.0 ± 1.9
59.5 ± 3.3
39.4 ± 2.9
smacv2_10_units
75.0 ± 1.3
69.0 ± 1.7
63.5 ± 2.5
65.7 ± 0.6
47.4 ± 0.4
62.1 ± 1.6
29.5 ± 2.4
Table 2. Performance comparison after learning 1×107 timesteps. The upper section shows the average win rate performances in SMAX tasks, with values presented as mean (standard deviation). The lower section shows the episode returns in MABrax tasks, with values presented as mean ± standard deviation. For each task, we conducted experiments with 5 random seeds. The bold numerals denote the highest performance for each task. Note that QMIX and VDN are not applicable to continuous tasks, and therefore, no results are available for MABrax tasks.
Figure 4. (a) and (b) represent the learning curve of the aggregated performance for all tasks on SMAX and MABrax, respectively. (a) and (b) represent the learning curve of the aggregated performance for all tasks on SMAX and MABrax, respectively.
method
5m_vs_6m
3s5z_vs_3s6z
DT-ISR
93.7
87.3
ST-ISR
44.4
80.8
IT-ISR
58.6
83.7
No Correction
34.5
74.9
Table 3. Ablation study on DT-ISR.
η
5m_vs_6m
3s5z_vs_3s6z
win rate
Δci
win rate
Δci
1.0
95.2
-0.00154
84.5
-0.00105
1.056
93.7
-0.00409
87.3
-0.0067
1.1
93.1
-0.00553
83.2
-0.00918
1.15
39.4
-0.00561
80.3
-0.00938
Table 4. Impact of η on DT-ISR weights.
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 5. Brief overview of GPAE framework Brief overview of GPAE framework
Task Name
Ally Units
Enemy Units
2s3z
2 Stalkers, 3 Zealots
2 Stalkers, 3 Zealots
3s5z
3 Stalkers, 5 Zealots
3 Stalkers, 5 Zealots
5m_vs_6m
5 Marines
6 Marines
10m_vs_11m
10 Marines
11 Marines
3s5z_vs_3s6z
3 Stalkers, 5 Zealots
3 Stalkers, 6 Zealots
6h_vs_8z
6 Hydralisks
8 Zealots
Appendix
Table 5. Evaluated tasks in SMAX. These scenarios involve discrete actions and cooperative combat against adversarial teams.
Figure 6. Figures represent the learning curve of the average win rate performance for 6 tasks on SMAX, and the learning curve of the average episode return performance for 6 tasks on MABrax. Figures represent the learning curve of the average win rate performance for 6 tasks on SMAX, and the learning curve of the average episode return performance for 6 tasks on MABrax.
method
GPAE
GAE
DAE
DT-ISR
93.7
35.1
29.4
ST-ISR
44.4
10.9
9.7
IT-ISR
58.6
9.6
14.5
No Correction
34.5
10.6
10.8
Appendix
Table 6. Ablation study on DT-ISR.
Parameter
SMAX
MABrax
# training timesteps
1×107
1×107
# parallel environments
128
64
# rollout steps
128
128
Adam learning rate
5×10−4
1×10−3
Anneal learning rate
True
True
Update epochs
5
5
Appendix
Table 7. Hyperparameter settings of PPO and Off-Policy PPO in the SMAX and MABrax environment
Parameter
SMAX
# training timesteps
1×107
# parallel environments
16
# rollout steps
128
Adam learning rate
5×10−5
Anneal learning rate
True
Buffer size
5×103
Appendix
Table 8. Hyperparameter settings of QMIX and VDN in the SMAX environment
Offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) aims to learn the optimal joint policy from pre-collected datasets, requiring a trade-off between maximizing global returns and mitigating distribution shift from offline data. Recent studies use diffusion or flow generative models to capture complex joint policy behaviors among agents; however, they typically rely on multi-step iterative sampling, thereby reducing training and inference efficiency. Although further research improves sampling efficiency through methods like distillation, it remains sensitive to the behavior regularization coefficient. To address the above-mentioned issues, we propose Value Guidance Multi-agent MeanFlow Policy (VGM2P), a simple yet effective flow-based policy learning framework that enables efficient action generation with coefficient-insensitive conditional behavior cloning. Specifically, VGM2P uses global advantage values to guide agent collaboration, treating optimal policy learning as conditional behavior cloning. Additionally, to improve policy expressiveness and inference efficiency in multi-agent scenarios, it leverages classifier-free guidance MeanFlow for both policy training and execution. Experiments on tasks with both discrete and continuous action spaces demonstrate that, even when trained solely via conditional behavior cloning, VGM2P efficiently achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art methods.
Teng Pang, Zhiqiang Dong, Yan Zhang +3
School of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China · Luke EI, Jinan, China
Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a powerful paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet it suffers from interaction-level ambiguity that blurs generation, critique, and revision, making credit assignment across agents difficult. Moreover, policy optimization in this setting is vulnerable to heavy-tailed and noisy rewards, which can bias advantage estimation and trigger unstable or even divergent training. To address both issues, we propose a robust multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for collaborative reasoning, consisting of two components: Dual-Agent Answer-Critique-Rewrite (DACR) and an Adaptive Robust Estimator (ARE). DACR decomposes reasoning into a structured three-stage pipeline: answer, critique, and rewrite, while enabling explicit attribution of each agent's marginal contribution to its partner's performance. ARE provides robust estimation of batch experience means during multi-agent policy optimization. Across mathematical reasoning and embodied intelligence benchmarks, even under noisy rewards, our method consistently outperforms the baseline in both homogeneous and heterogeneous settings. These results indicate stronger robustness to reward noise and more stable training dynamics, effectively preventing optimization failures caused by noisy reward signals.
Zhongyi Li, Wan Tian, Jingyu Chen +8
Beihang University · Peking University · Chinese Academy of Sciences +1
Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) provides a powerful framework for learning coordinated behaviors through interactions with the environment. Developing MARL policies requires balancing expressive modeling of complex and multimodal action distributions with efficient training and execution. Generative policies, particularly diffusionbased policies, can faithfully capture complex and multimodal behaviors, but costly iterative sampling hinders their scalability in online multi-agent settings. We propose an Online MARL framework via one-step Flow model (OMAF) that combines expressive generative policies with efficient one-step action generation. OMAF employs a Transformer-based flow policy to capture complex coordination behaviors, while its approximate path score surrogate provides a principled route to synchronized flow policy optimization. To enable stable and sampleefficient learning, we further develop a joint optimization scheme coupling softmax Q-value estimation with a joint flow policy objective for coordinated policy learning. By eliminating iterative sampling, OMAF dramatically reduces training overhead without sacrificing policy expressiveness. Extensive experiments across 10 standard tasks from MPE and MAMuJoCo show that OMAF consistently achieves superior performance, with up to 3.4x higher returns and 10.5x sample efficiency improvement compared with baseline methods. These results validate the effectiveness of OMAF as an expressive and computationally efficient one-step flow policy paradigm for online MARL.
Zhuoran Li, Yunzhan Li, Xun Wang +2
Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University · Engineering Systems and Design Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design