TritonDFT: Automating DFT with a Multi-Agent Framework
Organizations: University of California, San Diego · University of California, Merced · Los Alamos National Laboratory
Abstract
Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a cornerstone of materials science, yet executing DFT in practice requires coordinating a complex, multi-step workflow. Existing tools and LLM-based solutions automate parts of the steps, but lack support for full workflow automation, diverse task adaptation, and accuracy-cost trade-off optimization in DFT configuration. To this end, we present TritonDFT, a multi-agent framework that enables efficient and accurate DFT execution through an expert-curated, extensible workflow design, Pareto-aware parameter inference, and multi-source knowledge augmentation. We further introduce DFTBench, a benchmark for evaluating the agent's multi-dimensional capabilities, spanning science expertise, trade0off optimization, HPC knowledge, and cost efficiency. TritonDFT provides an open user interface for real-world usage. Our website is at https://www.tritondft.com. Our source code and benchmark suite are available at https://github.com/Leo9660/TritonDFT.git.
Figures & tables
| Method | Framework Architecture | Evaluation Dataset & Metrics | ||||||
| Supported Task Types | Parameter Configuration | Knowledge Augmentation | Number of Material Types | Ground Truth Curation | Accuracy-Cost Tradeoff | Parallel Efficiency | Monetary Cost | |
| DREAMS ( Wang et al., 2025 ) | Surface Chemistry (Adsorption) | Physics Only | Open Database | 2 (Metal, Insulator) | Public Dataset | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| VASPilot ( Liu et al., 2025 ) | Electronic Structure (Band, DOS) | Physics Only | Open Database | 1 (Semiconductor) | Public Dataset | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| AgenticDFT ( Xia et al., 2025 ) | Geometry & Energetics (Relaxation, Band) | Physics Only | Open Database | 2 (Metal, Semiconductor) | Public Dataset | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| TritonDFT (Ours) | General QE Usage ( Types) | Physics + HPC (Pareto-aware) | Open Database + Memory + Human Interact. | 10 (Metal, Insulator, van der Waals, Topological, …) | Expert Curated Calculation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model | 20 meV/atom | 10 meV/atom | 1 meV/atom | Advanced Parameter Satisfaction Rate | |||
| Pass Rate | Norm. Cost | Pass Rate | Norm. Cost | Pass Rate | Norm. Cost | ||
| GPT 5.2 | 70.5% | 14.29 | 67.0% | 8.95 | 47.1% | 4.23 | 51.3% |
| GPT 5.1 | 39.3% | 6.22 | 32.9% | 4.21 | 9.8% | 2.24 | 43.6% |
| GPT 4o | 52.8% | 1.85 | 38.2% | 1.28 | 13.6% | 0.50 | 28.2% |
| GPT 4o mini | 5.7% | 1.01 | 5.6% | 1.17 | 4.5% | 0.97 | 28.2% |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 59.6% | 3.77 | 53.9% | 2.95 | 14.9% | 1.24 | 48.7% |
| Model | VC-relax (Lattice) | SCF (E/atom) | Bandgap (eV) | E F (eV) |
| GPT 5.2 | 5.7% | 0.0% | 0.34 | 1.32 |
| GPT 5.1 | 7.4% | 0.1% | 0.45 | 2.34 |
| GPT 4o | 10.1% | 1.2% | 1.90 | 8.17 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 5.5% | 0.1% | 1.02 | 1.45 |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 8.1% | 0.5% | 1.19 | 7.09 |
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 8.0% | 0.1% | 1.84 | 3.01 |
| Model | 16 Cores | 32 Cores | 64 Cores |
| GPT 5.2 | +14.4% | +4.2% | +15.1% |
| GPT 5.1 | +11.3% | -5.8% | -14.1% |
| GPT 4o | -21.0% | -34.0% | -23.6% |
| GPT 4o mini | -25.7% | -25.6% | +2.8% |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 4.74% | -6.4% | -3.29% |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | -20.7% | -43.7% | -32.0% |
| Model | Struct Relax | Band Gap | DOS |
| GPT 5.2 | 0.05 0.02 | 0.15 0.04 | 0.13 0.04 |
| GPT 5.1 | 0.04 0.02 | 0.13 0.04 | 0.10 0.03 |
| GPT 4o | 0.06 0.03 | 0.18 0.04 | 0.14 0.03 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 0.05 0.03 | 0.13 0.04 | 0.11 0.04 |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 0.01 0.01 | 0.03 0.01 | 0.03 0.01 |
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 0.15 0.08 | 0.44 0.13 | 0.37 0.11 |
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| # | Material | Category | Space Group | Atoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CaO | Insulator | Fm m | 2 |
| 2 | KCl | Insulator | Fm m | 2 |
| 3 | LiF | Insulator | Fm m | 2 |
| 4 | MgF 2 | Insulator | P4 2 /mnm | 6 |
| 5 | MgO | Insulator | Fm m | 2 |
| 6 | NaCl | Insulator | Fm m | 2 |
Scientific Workflow Automation
Scientific workflow automation uses software, AI agents, and laboratory systems to plan, execute, validate, and reproduce research tasks.
See all 160 papers