Robust LLM-based Audio-Visual Speech Recognition with Sparse Modality Alignment and Visual Unit-Guided Refinement
Authors: Fei Su, Cancan Li, Juan Liu, Wei Ju, Hongbin Suo, Ming Li
Organizations: School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University, China · AI Center, OPPO, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China · Digital Innovation Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, China
Audio-Visual Speech Recognition (AVSR) integrates acoustic and visual information to enhance robustness in adverse acoustic conditions. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have yielded competitive automatic speech recognition performance and shown effectiveness for AVSR. However, prior approaches project audio and visual features independently or apply shallow fusion, limiting cross-modal alignment and complementary exchange while increasing the LLM's computational load. To address this, we propose AVUR-LLM, an LLM-based Audio-Visual Speech Recognition via Sparse Modality Alignment and Visual Unit-Guided Refinement. Experiments on LRS3 demonstrate state-of-the-art results for AVSR. Under additive-noise conditions at 0 dB SNR, it achieves 37% relative improvement over the baseline system.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Illustration of AVUR-LLM. (a) The Sparse Modality Alignment (SMA) module, audio-conditioned cross-attention sparsely inserted into the upper audio encoder layers; (b) The Adaptive Modulated Fusion (AMF) module, confidence-aware gating that adaptively modulates visual injection in the decoder; (c) The Visual Unit-Guided Refinement (VUR) module, discretizes mid-layer visual features into tokens for LLM rescoring. Training has two stages: Stage 1 performs SMA+AMF and outputs N -best hypotheses; Stage 2 extracts and compresses Xvℓ into visual discrete tokens and uses a LoRA-adapted LLM to rescore the hypotheses. Here Xa and Xv denote audio and visual encoder features. X^v denotes the SMA-refined visual features, Xvℓ denotes visual features extracted from encoder layer ℓ . Xasg denotes the audio features serving as keys/values with stop-gradient. gAMF denotes the AMF gate coefficients.
Method
Audio Encoder
Visual Encoder
Training Data (h)
WER(%) ↓
Audio-Only
CM-seq2seq [ 31 ]
Conformer
–
433
2.3
Fast Conformer [ 32 ]
Conformer
–
435
1.6
AV-HuBERT [ 7 ]
Transformer
–
433
1.6
Whisper-finetuned [ 12 ]
Transformer
–
433
2.3
Auto-AVSR [ 9 ]
Conformer
–
1902/3448
1.0/1.0
Table 1: WER (%) on LRS3 for AVUR-LLM and previous methods in ASR and AVSR under 30 h, 433 h, and LRS3+VoxCeleb2 (1759 h) settings.
Method
Modality
Clean
SNR Level (dB) , WER (%) ↓
10
5
0
-5
-10
AV-HuBERT [ 7 ]
AV
1.4
2.0
2.6
5.8
16.6
34.9
CMA [ 33 ]
1.5
1.8
2.4
4.4
11.9
25.8
Whisper-Flamingo [ 12 ]
1.1
1.4
2.0
6.3
28.0
42.6
AVGER [ 20 ]
1.1
–
1.9
3.7
12.3
29.1
Llama-AVSR [ 15 ]
0.95
–
2.2
4.2
16.9
–
Table 2: WER (%) on LRS3 (433 h setting) under clean and noisy conditions. We report AVSR results at SNRs {10, 5, 0, −5 , −10 } dB. “–” indicates not reported.
Figure 2: Effect of visual discrete tokens extraction depth and codebook size on WER (%). Solid lines denote clean, dashed lines denote 0 dB SNR. Blue curves denote K-means codebook size K=1000 , red curves denote K=2000 .
Method
SMA
AMF
VUR
Clean
Noisy
Whisper-Flamingo [ 12 ]
–
–
–
1.10
6.30
Llama-AVSR [ 15 ]
–
–
–
0.95
4.20
Staged ablation
AVUR-LLM (full)
✓
✓
✓
0.75
1.70
– w/o VUR
✓
✓
✗
0.97
5.50
– w/o AMF (SMA only)
✓
✗
✗
1.30
6.70
Table 3: Ablation of AVUR-LLM on LRS3 (433 h) under clean and noisy (0 dB SNR) conditions.
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Kyoto, Japan · Research Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica, Taiwan