Two-Stage Photovoltaic Forecasting: Separating Weather Prediction from Plant-Characteristics

Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting requires models to represent regular solar cycles and weather-driven fluctuations whose importance changes with the forecast horizon. This study develops a hierarchical ensemble that combines temporal neural models, historical analogs, state climatology, and gradient-boosted trees. Solar geometry and numerical weather forecasts describe the expected generation conditions, while horizon-specific convex weights combine complementary predictions. A separate calibration step uses available historical forecast errors to account for recent bias. The framework is evaluated on public PVDAQ data at 15--240-minute horizons and on three GEFCom2014 solar zones at hourly horizons up to four hours. On PVDAQ, the ensemble achieves a daylight capacity-normalized mean absolute error of 4.315%, reducing error by 4.11% relative to full-feature LightGBM and by 6.03% relative to fine-tuned Chronos-2 under identical calibration. Expert-removal experiments identify redundancy within the ensemble. Across three training seeds on GEFCom2014, learned fusion improves upon equal weighting but performs comparably to LightGBM. The results support horizon-specific combination as a useful forecasting strategy while showing that its advantage over strong individual models depends on the dataset and evaluation period.

An ensemble can improve photovoltaic forecasts while adding components that contribute little or increase computation. We assess these effects through matched comparisons and ablations of a fixed heterogeneous predictor bank. Hourly experiments use GEFCom2014 and three additional public datasets, with chronological partitions and three seeds. Under retrospective ERA5 assistance, static fusion reduces scaled mean absolute error against matched boosting by 1.11%, 4.41%, and 1.63% on PVDAQ, OPSD, and Ausgrid; only OPSD remains supported after multiple-comparison correction. Weather gating offers no consistent incremental benefit. Exploratory member removals show group-level dependence alongside individual redundancy. A separate, previously inspected fifteen-minute case replaces one neural member with a tree predictor: normalized error falls by 1.72%, but measured inference is slower. These findings support component-wise evaluation with explicit limits on weather availability and test-set reuse.

Reliable photovoltaic (PV) forecasts can support low-carbon energy systems, but deployed sites may have only short and incomplete records. Physical and hybrid methods can be sensitive to weather inputs, calibration, and timestamp-alignment, while individual machine learning models may capture different parts of the forecasting problem. We study hourly day-ahead PV forecasting at a United Kingdom charging station using one year of inverter measurements, with 9.25% of hours missing. The pipeline checks timestamp-alignment, derives solar and clearness features, adds short-term weather context, and combines five complementary models using non-negative least squares stacking, with the combination fitted only on validation observations. We compare against smart persistence, a weather-scaled baseline that carries the previous day's PV behaviour forward using target-day irradiance. With retrospective weather, the combined model reduces daylight normalised root mean square error (RMSE) by 31.2% under random day-fold evaluation and by 2.9% under rolling-origin evaluation, although the latter improvement is not robust across days. It also improves by 3.0% over the single model selected from validation performance. Replacing retrospective weather with a public product sampled at a constant 24-hour lead increases daylight RMSE by 13.1% and 4.2% under the two protocols, while retaining positive skill over smart persistence.