We investigate the use of zero-shot text-to-speech (ZS-TTS) as a data augmentation source for low-resource personalized speech synthesis. While synthetic augmentation can provide linguistically rich and phonetically diverse speech, naively mixing large amounts of synthetic speech with limited real recordings often leads to speaker similarity degradation during fine-tuning. To address this issue, we propose ZeSTA, a simple domain-conditioned training framework that distinguishes real and synthetic speech via a lightweight domain embedding, combined with real-data oversampling to stabilize adaptation under extremely limited target data, without modifying the base architecture. Experiments on LibriTTS and an in-house dataset with two ZS-TTS sources demonstrate that our approach improves speaker similarity over naive synthetic augmentation while preserving intelligibility and perceptual quality. Audio samples are available on our web page.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: ZeSTA framework: training pipeline (a) and inference pipeline (b).
Corpus
#Spk (M/F)
Train
Valid
Test
LibriTTS
8 (4/4)
[198,286]
[20,29]
[20,29]
YoBind
6 (3/3)
[133,375]
[13,37]
[13,37]
Table 1: Summary statistics of the LibriTTS and YoBind datasets. Both datasets are gender-balanced. Ranges denote the minimum and maximum number of utterances per speaker.
Corpus
Fish-Speech
CosyVoice 2
LibriTTS
0.763
0.794
YoBind
0.756
0.788
Table 2: SECS scores of synthetic speech used as Synth 90% .
Source ZS-TTS
Training Data
DC
OS
LibriTTS
YoBind
SECS ↑
CER ↓
WER ↓
SECS ↑
CER ↓
WER ↓
Real-Only Training
Real 10%
–
–
0.818
5.932
12.520
0.813
5.063
11.035
Real 100%
–
–
0.832
6.539
13.645
0.840
4.743
10.424
Fish-Speech [ 26 ]
Real 10% + Synth 90%
–
–
0.765
4.738
10.348
0.764
4.081
9.358
Real 10% + Synth 90%
–
✓
0.770
4.802
10.470
0.770
4.085
9.542
Real 10% + Synth 90%
✓
–
0.807
4.962
10.879
0.792
4.471
9.965
Table 3: Objective evaluation results on LibriTTS and YoBind datasets. (+Extra Synth) indicates extra synthetic augmentation. Arrows indicate whether higher ( ↑ ) or lower ( ↓ ) values are better.
ZS-TTS
Training Data
DC
OS
LibriTTS
YoBind
MOS (Naturalness)
Ground Truth (Recordings)
–
–
4.31 ± 0.28
4.31 ± 0.30
Real-Only
Real 10%
–
–
3.58 ± 0.42
2.85 ± 0.47
Real 100%
–
–
3.67 ± 0.34
3.50 ± 0.40
FS
Real 10% + Synth 90%
–
–
3.86 ± 0.37
3.50 ± 0.35
Real 10% + Synth 90%
✓
✓
3.92 ± 0.27
3.58 ± 0.38
Table 4: Subjective evaluation results on LibriTTS and YoBind datasets. MOS scores (95% CI) measure perceived naturalness. ABX values indicate preference (%) for the proposed system over the baseline ( Real 10% + Synth 90% without DC or OS). All ABX results are statistically significant under a two-sided binomial test ( p<0.05 ).
Figure 2: t-SNE visualization of latent representations for a target speaker under different synthetic augmentation settings.
Emb. Size
SECS ↑
CER ↓
WER ↓
16
0.807
5.118
11.229
64
0.807
4.962
10.879
256
0.800
5.036
11.033
Table 5: Effect of domain embedding size on speaker similarity and intelligibility evaluated on LibriTTS. Synthetic data are generated using Fish-Speech. All models are trained with Real 10% + Synth 90% data using DC without OS.
Training Data
SECS ↑
CER ↓
WER ↓
Real 10% (baseline)
0.818
5.932
12.520
Speaker-matched
0.807
4.962
10.879
Speaker-mismatched
0.792
5.817
12.354
Table 6: Ablation on speaker-matched vs. speaker-mismatched synthetic data. Synthetic augmentation uses the same setup ( Real 10% + Synth 90% ) with DC and without OS.
Recently, zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) has enabled high-fidelity and expressive speech synthesis, but it often fails to imitate unseen speaking styles from uncommon scenarios (e.g., crosstalk, dialects). Moreover, fine-tuning pretrained models requires large, high-quality datasets, limiting rapid personalization. We propose VoiceTTA, a reinforcement learning-based test-time adaptation (TTA) method that improves voice imitation of pretrained zero-shot TTS models. VoiceTTA introduces two style rewards based on coefficient-of-variation differences of F0 and energy, combined with speaker similarity and intelligibility (WER from a pretrained Whisper model), and optimizes learnable prefixes via group relative preference optimization (GRPO) in a flow matching-based model at inference time. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements on uncommon speech prompts, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Audio samples are available at https://voicetta.pages.dev/
Tianxin Xie, Chenxing Li, Dong Yu +1
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Tencent
Zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) can reproduce an unseen speaker from a short reference recording, but typically entangles speaker identity and accent within the same reference. We introduce DEFINE, an end-to-end framework that decouples these factors by conditioning speaker identity and target accent on separate audio exemplars. A single inference-time guidance weight continuously controls accent strength without retraining. Built on F5-TTS with parameter-efficient LoRA adaptation, DEFINE maps short accent exemplars into a conditioning space using an exemplar encoder supervised through learned accent prototypes, requiring neither accent labels at inference time nor post-synthesis waveform conversion. On seen accents, increasing accent guidance improves accent-probe accuracy from 6.5% to 19.6%. More importantly, a single DEFINE model generalizes accent control beyond its training accent set: on seen and out-of-domain accents, though not on held-out accents, it matches the accent transfer performance of a two-model TTS-voice-conversion cascade while achieving higher speaker similarity and comparable predicted speech quality. These results demonstrate that speaker identity and accent can be independently controlled from audio exemplars within a single zero-shot TTS model, including for accents unseen during training.
Ambuj Mehrish, Abhinaba Roy, Alex Ivanov +2
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice · Singapore University of Technology and Design · Kandinsky Lab +1
Automatic speech recognition remains unreliable for dysarthric speech due to data scarcity and high inter-speaker variability. While synthetic data can address these gaps, traditional methods often require extensive speaker-specific data, reintroducing the collection bottleneck. We investigate zero-shot voice cloning as a low-burden augmentation strategy, using Higgs Audio V2 to clone speakers in the TORGO dataset. We fine-tune (FT) Whisper-medium on cloned, real, and hybrid data and evaluate on held-out real speech. Compared to the zero-shot (31.62%), Clone FT achieved a competitive 26.00% WER, nearly matching the 24.44% and 25.12% seen with Real and Hybrid FT, respectively. Notably, Clone and Hybrid FT outperform Real FT for moderate-severe speakers. Clone FT achieves the best results (11.45% relative) in cross-corpus evaluation on the SAP-1102. These results suggest that zero-shot cloning provides scalable training data that circumvents the costly data collection bottleneck.
Satwinder Singh, Qianli Wang, Zihan Zhong +4
DeepNet Discovery Network, University of Auckland, New Zealand · University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA