Multimodal perception enables robust autonomous driving but incurs unnecessary computational cost when all sensors remain active. This paper presents PRAM-R, a unified Perception-Reasoning-Action-Memory framework with LLM-Guided Modality Routing for adaptive autonomous driving. PRAM-R adopts an asynchronous dual-loop design: a fast reactive loop for perception and control, and a slow deliberative loop for reasoning-driven modality selection and memory updates. An LLM router selects and weights modalities using environmental context and sensor diagnostics, while a hierarchical memory module preserves temporal consistency and supports long-term adaptation. We conduct a two-stage evaluation: (1) synthetic stress tests for stability analysis and (2) real-world validation on the nuScenes dataset. Synthetic stress tests confirm 87.2% reduction in routing oscillations via hysteresis-based stabilization. Real-world validation on nuScenes shows 6.22% modality reduction with 20% memory recall while maintaining comparable trajectory accuracy to full-modality baselines in complex urban scenarios. Our work demonstrates that LLM-augmented architectures with hierarchical memory achieve efficient, adaptive multimodal perception in autonomous driving.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Perception-Reasoning-Action-Memory Framework with modality routing for complex scene interpretation and motion control in autonomous driving: (1) Perception-layer, (2) Language-layer, (3) Action-layer, and (4) Memory-Layer.
Category
Modality
Diagnostic Indicators
Description
Enabled
Contextual Indicators
Interpretation
Reference
Sensor
Camera
Brightness mean
Average gray-level intensity or exposure value within image patches.
Ratio of luminance difference between bright and dark regions.
✓
Visibility quality
Low contrast → Low visibility → Fog, rain, or night scenes.
[ 10 ]
Edge density
Number of edges per image area, estimated by gradient magnitude.
✓
Texture density
Low edge density → Low texture density → Less structural information, degraded image clarity.
[ 20 ]
LiDAR
Point cloud density
Average number of LiDAR points per spatial cell.
✓
Lidar data completeness
Low density → Low data completeness → Sparse data.
[ 7 ] , [ 31 ]
Noise ratio
Fraction of points with abnormal intensity or geometry.
✓
Lidar signal quality
High noise ratio → Low signal quality → fog or heavy rain.
[ 7 ]
Reflectivity ratio
Ratio of measured to nominal reflectivity.
✓
Lidar signal quality
Low reflectivity ratio → Low signal quality → Fog or heavy rain.
[ 2 ]
TABLE I : Diagnostic and Contextual Indicators for Modality Routing
Component
Generation
Reading
Updating
Expiration
P-Routing Context
System start or first valid diagnostics
Before and after each routing decision
When new diagnostics or context arrive
After next round of routing decision
P-Semantic Cache
First deep-perception output in scene
Before each reasoning cycle
New deep-perception result
After each reasoning cycle
R-Scene Record
First completed reasoning cycle
Planning request or logging call
After every reasoning cycle
Scene end
R-Seed State
After first reasoning cycle
At the start of the next reasoning cycle
When significant context change or periodic refresh
Scene/route reset
A-Policy Log
First control command in scene
Validation or diagnostics
Each control cycle
Scene end
Knowledge Repository
Distill from all other memory components with quality threshold met
Scene reference or experience analysis
Continuous consolidation
Policy pruning or dataset management
TABLE II : Trigger Conditions of Memory Components in the PRAM-R Framework
Fig. 2 : Hierarchical and sequential organization of PRAM-R memory components and their temporal scales.
Fig. 3 : Threshold-Fluctuation Stress Test. Comparison of routing behavior under high-frequency perturbations. (a) Weights before and after EMA and hysteresis gating across timestep. (b) Corresponding binary activation states.
Modality
Switches (Thr)
Switches (Hyst)
Reduction (%)
Camera
11
2
81.8%
LiDAR
18
2
88.9%
Radar
18
2
88.9%
Total
47
6
87.2%
TABLE III : Effect of Hysteresis on Routing Stability under Fluctuations (threshold-only vs hysteresis)
Fig. 4 : Combined Memory Recall Rate. Comparison of short-term (rolling) and long-term (cumulative) recall rates for two different sampling frequencies.
Variant
RE(%)
RC
RSI
MRR
ADE(m)
FDE(m)
Static Fusion (PLA)
0.00
1.000
1.000
0.000
1.013
2.026
PRAM-R (w/o Memory)
6.02
0.992
0.662
0.000
N/A
N/A
PRAM-R (w/o Dual-loop)
5.67
0.998
0.641
0.313
N/A
N/A
Full PRAM-R
6.22
0.991
0.699
0.2000
1.124
2.182
TABLE IV : Ablation study on memory and hierarchical routing components.
Fig. 5 : Comprehensive routing statistics across nuScenes. (a) Modality activation rates demonstrate adaptive engagement. (b) Mean weight trajectories illustrate stable yet flexible fusion. (c) Reliability distributions differs from each modality.
Vision-Language Models (VLM) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, showing promise for end-to-end autonomous driving systems. Chain-of-Thought (CoT), as VLM's widely used reasoning strategy, is facing critical challenges. Existing textual CoT has a large gap between text semantic space and trajectory physical space. Although the recent approach utilizes future image to replace text as CoT process, it lacks clear planning-oriented objective guidance to generate images with accurate scene evolution. To address these, we innovatively propose MindDriver, a progressive multimodal reasoning framework that enables VLM to imitate human-like progressive thinking for autonomous driving. MindDriver presents semantic understanding, semantic-to-physical space imagination, and physical-space trajectory planning. To achieve aligned reasoning processes in MindDriver, we develop a feedback-guided automatic data annotation pipeline to generate aligned multimodal reasoning training data. Furthermore, we develop a progressive reinforcement fine-tuning method to optimize the alignment through progressive high- level reward-based learning. MindDriver demonstrates superior performance in both nuScences open-loop and Bench2Drive closed-loop evaluation. Codes are available at https://github.com/hotdogcheesewhite/MindDriver.
Lingjun Zhang, Yujian Yuan, Changjie Wu +7
Amap, Alibaba Group · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · The Chinese University of Hong Kong +1
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can perceive a traffic scene, reason about it, and propose a driving action within a single model. However, existing MLLM-based drivers reason from scratch at each frame and commit to a single explanation, discarding earlier hypotheses about the scene. When the scene is ambiguous, the agent locks in on the wrong interpretation and acts on it before evidence accumulates. In this paper, we propose DriveMind, an MLLM-based driving framework that keeps several hypotheses about the scene alive at the same time and updates their weights as new frames arrive. Inspired by particle filtering, DriveMind propagates each hypothesis through a VLM, scores it against the current observation, and resamples to maintain diversity. On Bench2Drive, adding belief tracking to the same driving pipeline improves the Driving Score (DS) from 68.50 to 81.37 and the Success Rate (SR) from 41.36% to 54.09%. The largest gains occur on ambiguous scenarios such as unsignalized intersections (+20.0 DS) and oncoming-traffic interactions (+20.5 DS). Beyond the overall metrics, DriveMind also improves fine-grained interactive driving abilities such as merging, emergency braking, and give-way.
Yan Shi, Kehua Chen, Jiarui Qi +3
University of Washington · McGill University · University of Michigan
While large language models (LLMs) offer promising reasoning capabilities, their integration into safety-critical driving systems is hindered by limited reasoning diversity, high computational overhead, and static learning paradigms. To address these challenges, we propose LUNA-AD, a lightweight uncertainty-aware language model with lifelong learning for autonomous driving (AD). LUNA-AD features a tri-system architecture that reconciles complex multimodal behavioral reasoning, efficient deployment, and continual refinement. We design a multi-agent analytical system to generate uncertainty-aware decision-making demonstrations through diverse hypothesis exploration. A dual-head lightweight heuristic model is distilled to unify the inference of decision distributions and textual explanations while enabling efficient deployment. Furthermore, a reflection-driven lifelong learning mechanism operates on multimodal decision outputs and preserves strategic diversity, allowing for the refinement of candidate decisions and rationales via closed-loop feedback to enhance driving robustness. Extensive experiments on nuPlan benchmarks demonstrate that LUNA-AD achieves state-of-the-art success rates under both non-reactive and reactive modes, with drastically reduced inference latency compared to existing knowledge-driven AD frameworks.
Ruoyu Yao, Pei Liu, Ruiguo Zhong +3
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China