A Unified Framework for Joint Detection of Lacunes and Enlarged Perivascular Spaces
Authors: Lucas He, Krinos Li, Hanyuan Zhang, Runlong He, Silvia Ingala, Luigi Lorenzini, Marleen de Bruijne, Frederik Barkhof, Rhodri Davies, Carole Sudre
Organizations: Hawkes Institute, University College London, UK · Unit for Lifelong Health and Aging, University College London, UK · Bioengineering Department and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, UK · Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark · Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, The Netherlands · Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands · Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK · Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, UK · Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, specifically enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) and lacunae, present a unique challenge in medical image analysis due to their radiological mimicry. Standard segmentation networks struggle with feature interference and extreme class imbalance when handling these divergent targets simultaneously. To address these issues, we propose a morphology-decoupled framework where Zero-Initialized Gated Cross-Task Attention exploits dense EPVS context to guide sparse lacune detection. Furthermore, biological and topological consistency are enforced via a mixed-supervision strategy integrating Mutual Exclusion and Centerline Dice losses. Finally, we introduce an Anatomically-Informed Inference Calibration mechanism to dynamically suppress false positives based on tissue semantics. Extensive 5-folds cross-validation on the VALDO 2021 dataset (N=40) demonstrates state-of-the-art performance, notably surpassing task winners in lacunae detection precision (71.1%, p=0.01) and F1-score (62.6%, p=0.03). Furthermore, evaluation on the external EPAD cohort (N=1762) confirms the model's robustness for large-scale population studies. Code will be released upon acceptance.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the Proposed Morphology-Decoupled Framework.
Task/Model
VALDO
EPAD
Segmentation
Detection
Task 1: EPVS
DSC (%) ↑
NSD (%) ↑
Recall (%) ↑
Precision (%) ↑
F1 (%) ↑
FP/Subject ↓
ρ (BG) ↑
ρ (CSO) ↑
ρ (MB) ↑
DYN Unet
36.9±9.7
56.9±12.5
50.2±1.8
54.9±16.2
48.6±9.8
21.0±11.9
0.13±0.02
0.17±0.02
0.10±0.02
MedNeXt
37.9±10.2
55.6±12.0
52.4±7.5
46.1±13.2
45.7±8.7
30.6±19.5
0.09±0.02
0.09±0.02
0.06±0.02
Swin-UNETR V2
41.9±9.2
62.2±11.9
58.4±5.6
55.0±19.7
50.5±10.7
30.4±23.6
0.02±0.02
0.05±0.02
0.03±0.02
VISTA-3D
36.3±8.0
57.6±9.8
51.0±8.3
49.7±10.7
47.7±9.1
23.7±7.6
0.14±0.03
0.17±0.02
0.10±0.03
Table 1: Comparison with SOTA methods on the VALDO and EPAD datasets. Bold indicates best numerical results. * denotes statistical significance. Spearman’s rank correlation and Pearson’s correlation coefficient are denoted by ρ and r , respectively.
Figure 2: Qualitative visualization on the VALDO dataset. Ground truth lesions (cyan), true positive predictions (green), and false positive predictions (red) are shown.
Task/model
Segmentation
Detection
LMT
Lexc
LclDice
DSC (%) ↑
NSD (%) ↑
Recall (%) ↑
Precision (%) ↑
F1 (%) ↑
FP/Subject ↓
Task 1: EPVS
✓
35.6±9.4
54.5±12.0
45.6±7.6
58.9±17.3
47.7±9.6
17.1±14.2
✓
✓
35.7±9.5
54.2±11.9
46.9±7.7
59.2±17.5
48.9±9.8
15.3±13.6
✓
✓
36.9±9.7
54.7±12.1
46.6±7.7
62.6±19.1
49.2±9.9
16.4±12.3
✓
✓
✓
34.3±8.0
51.1±12.4
47.1±7.5
60.4±10.7
50.0±6.2
16.5±11.6
Table 2: Ablation of objective functions on VALDO. Bold indicates numercial best
Task/model
Segmentation
Detection
Method
Decoder
Anatomical
DSC (%) ↑
NSD (%) ↑
Recall (%) ↑
Precision (%) ↑
F1 (%) ↑
FP/Subject ↓
Task 1: EPVS
STL-Full
–
–
12.4±17.3
20.4±27.5
25.9±17.9
21.4±18.0
18.3±14.8
94.8±91.9
STL-Mix
–
–
36.9±9.7
56.9±12.5
50.2±1.8
54.9±16.2
48.6±9.8
21.0±11.9
MTL
Shared
34.3±8.0
51.1±12.4
47.1±8.5
60.4±10.7
50.0±6.2
16.5±11.6
MTL
Shared
✓
35.3±7.1
52.8±10.8
47.1±8.5
60.8±12.7
49.8±6.7
16.1±11.1
Table 3: Comparison of supervision strategies, cross-task attention decoupling, and anatomical calibration on the VALDO dataset. Bold indicates numerical best results.
Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK · Canon Medical Research Europe, Edinburgh, UK · UK Dementia Research Institute, Centre at The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK +5
Pujian Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China · Keyi College of Zhejiang Sci-tech University, ShaoXing, China · College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China