Bid optimization in online advertising relies on black-box machine-learning models that learn bidding decisions from historical data. However, these approaches fail to replicate human experts' adaptive, experience-driven, and globally coherent decisions. Specifically, they generalize poorly in data-sparse cases because of missing structured knowledge, make short-sighted sequential decisions that ignore long-term interdependencies, and struggle to adapt in out-of-distribution scenarios where human experts succeed. To address this, we propose KBD (Knowledge-informed Bidding with Dual-process control), a novel method for bid optimization. KBD embeds human expertise as inductive biases through the informed machine-learning paradigm, uses Decision Transformer (DT) to globally optimize multi-step bidding sequences, and implements dual-process control by combining a fast rule-based PID (System 1) with DT (System 2). Extensive experiments highlight KBD's advantage over existing methods and underscore the benefit of grounding bid optimization in human expertise and dual-process control.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The architecture of the KBD method. Blue-shaded components denote black-box modules implemented via neural networks, yellow-shaded components indicate rule-based interpretable modules, and mixed-color regions represent their fusion.
Method
R/R∗↑
constraint satisfaction ↑
ARTEO ( Korkmaz et al., 2022 )
0.601
80.65%
BOCO ( Liang et al., 2023 )
0.618
74.10%
SPB ( Su et al., 2024b )
0.699
75.32%
PUROS ( Luo et al., 2024 )
0.723
81.73%
GCB-safe ( Castiglioni et al., 2025 )
0.606
80.77%
KBD w/o DT
0.706
81.43%
Table 1: Results of click maximization on iPinYou dataset.
Experimental Period
Group
Group Detail
cost-exhaust ratio
GMV
Campaign Duration
use PID
use IEFormer
use DT
2025/09/28-2025/10/18
Control Treatment
✓ ✓
✓
/ + 8.44%
/ + 6.14%
/ + 0.58%
2025/11/20-2025/12/10
Control Treatment
✓ ✓
✓
✓
/ +14.55%
/ +13.01%
/ +1.36%
2025/12/11-2025/12/31
Control Treatment
✓ ✓
✓ ✓
✓
/ +2.27%
/ +2.66%
/ +0.20%
Table 2: Online test results on ECA : relative lifts against control group; absolute metrics redacted for commercial confidentiality.
Figure 2: Case studies on the influence of Lmargin . As highlighted by the ellipsoidal regions, the price-volume curve is more prone to overfitting the noisy data without Lmargin .
Method
wmape ↓
mape ↓
perf10 ↑
w/o IE
0.2588
0.2348
0.2738
w/o GLA
0.2412
0.2270
0.2793
w/o Lmargin
0.2386
0.2268
0.2921
w/o tROI data
0.2226
0.2600
0.2976
KBD
0.2187
0.2151
0.3214
Table 3: Ablation Study of IML on ECA dataset.
Method
wmape ↓
mape ↓
IGCM ( Tang et al., 2025 )
0.9979
0.9949
GP ( Schulz et al., 2018 )
0.6414
1.8021
CMNN ( Li et al., 2024 )
0.6309
2.0599
DIPN ( Shen et al., 2021 )
0.6308
1.7647
SMNN ( Kim and Lee, 2024 )
0.6179
2.2503
SMM ( Igel, 2023 )
0.6023
1.6785
Table 4: Price-volume model performance on ECA dataset.
Figure 3: Robustness of IEFormer to segment number N.
Auto-bidding services optimize real-time bidding strategies for advertisers under key performance indicator (KPI) constraints such as target return on investment and budget. However, uncertainties such as model prediction errors and feedback latency can cause bidding strategies to deviate from ex-post optimality, leading to inefficient allocation. To address this issue, we propose JD-BP, a Joint generative Decision framework for Bidding and Pricing. Unlike prior methods, JD-BP jointly outputs a bid value and a pricing correction term that acts additively with the payment rule such as GSP. To mitigate adverse effects of historical constraint violations, we design a memory-less Return-to-Go that encourages future value maximizing of bidding actions while the cumulated bias is handled by the pricing correction. Moreover, a trajectory augmentation algorithm is proposed to generate joint bidding-pricing trajectories from a (possibly arbitrary) base bidding policy, enabling efficient plug-and-play deployment of our algorithm from existing RL/generative bidding models. Finally, we employ an Energy-Based Direct Preference Optimization method in conjunction with a cross-attention module to enhance the joint learning performance of bidding and pricing correction. Offline experiments on the AuctionNet dataset demonstrate that JD-BP achieves state-of-the-art performance. Online A/B tests at JD.com confirm its practical effectiveness, showing a 4.70% increase in ad revenue and a 6.48% improvement in target cost.
Linghui Meng, Chun Gan, Shengsheng Niu +8
JD.com China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong China
Auto-bidding is a core component of real-time advertising systems, where decisions must optimize long-term performance under budget and cost constraints, while online exploration is prohibitively risky. Offline reinforcement learning and, more recently, Transformer-based sequence modeling have shown promise for learning bidding policies from logged data, but their unimodal and purely parametric formulations often collapse multiple effective bidding strategies into suboptimal averaged actions and perform unreliably under sparse or long-tail traffic. To mitigate these limitations, we propose DRIVE (Distributional and Retrieval-Augmented Bidding with Value Evaluation), a unified Transformer-based framework that decouples candidate action generation from decision making for offline auto-bidding. DRIVE combines distributional action modeling, retrieval-augmented candidate generation from high-quality historical decisions, and value-based evaluation to select the most promising bid at inference time. Extensive experiments on AuctionNet and additional offline reinforcement learning benchmarks demonstrate that DRIVE consistently improves bidding performance and generalizes well across multiple Transformer-based methods.
Miduo Cui, Haochen Wang, Shangqin Mao +6
Shandong University, Jinan, China · Meituan, Beijing, China
Auto-bidding systems optimize bids to maximize value under efficiency constraints such as Cost-Per-Action (CPA). Existing methods treat each day as an independent episode. However, many advertisers produce value so sparsely that per-day efficiency ratios become statistically unreliable, undermining advertiser retention. Platforms therefore evaluate window-level efficiency over sliding windows of W=7 days, ensuring fair evaluation and long-term advertising effectiveness. This creates cross-episode coupling: each day's bidding decisions affect up to W overlapping windows, so setting daily targets requires anticipating future market conditions. We propose SWAG-Bid (Sliding-Window Aware Generative Auto-Bidding), a hierarchical framework decomposing this challenge into episode-level planning and step-level execution. The planner uses a Masked Trajectory Model to forecast markets and generate candidate plans, scored across all overlapping windows by Multi-Window Model Predictive Control Sampling (MWMS) with exponential confidence decay. The controller adjusts reliance on this guidance through a state-adaptive gate, Per-Step Gated Adaptive Layer Normalization (PSG-AdaLN), complemented by Return-to-Go and Cost-to-Go channels carrying budget and constraint information. Experiments on AuctionNet-Sparse and online A/B tests on AliExpress show that SWAG-Bid achieves competitive constraint satisfaction and value acquisition under sliding-window evaluation.
Binglin Wu, Chuan Yue, Yingyi Zhang +4
Dalian University of Technology · Alibaba International Digital Commerce Group · Dalian University of Technology & City University of Hong Kong