Gabor Primitives for Accelerated Cardiac Cine MRI Reconstruction
Organizations: Chair for AI in Healthcare and Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM) and TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany · School of Computation and Information Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany · Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Neuherberg, Germany · Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA · Munich Center for Machine Learning, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany · GE HealthCare, Munich, Germany · School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom · Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Abstract
Accelerated cardiac cine MRI requires reconstructing spatiotemporal images from highly undersampled k-space data. Implicit neural representations (INRs) enable scan-specific reconstruction without large training datasets, but encode content implicitly in network weights without physically interpretable parameters. Gaussian primitives provide an explicit and geometrically interpretable alternative, but their spectra are confined near the k-space origin, limiting high-frequency representation. We propose Gabor primitives for MRI reconstruction, modulating each Gaussian envelope with a complex exponential to place its spectral support at an arbitrary k-space location, enabling efficient representation of both smooth structures and sharp boundaries. To exploit spatiotemporal redundancy in cardiac cine, we decompose per-primitive temporal variation into a low-rank geometry basis capturing cardiac motion and a signal-intensity basis modeling contrast changes. Experiments on cardiac cine data with Cartesian and radial trajectories show that Gabor primitives consistently outperform compressed sensing, Gaussian primitives, and hash-grid INR baselines, while providing a compact, continuous-resolution representation with physically meaningful parameters.
Figures & tables
| Cartesian | Cartesian | Radial | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | PSNR | SSIM | FSIM | Time | PSNR | SSIM | FSIM | Time | PSNR | SSIM | FSIM | Time | |
| L+S [ 16 ] | — | 37.15 | 0.940 | 0.850 | 0.3 | 32.19 | 0.824 | 0.777 | 0.4 | 35.82 | 0.922 | 0.810 | 1.5 |
| PICS [ 14 ] | — | 42.21 | 0.972 | 0.886 | 0.1 | 41.05 | 0.966 | 0.875 | 0.1 | 35.19 | 0.905 | 0.793 | 1.1 |
| Hash-INR [ 15 ] | 2.60 | 39.63 | 0.921 | 0.841 | 4.6 | 37.77 | 0.893 | 0.815 | 4.6 | 34.00 | 0.849 | 0.767 | 8.0 |
| Gaussian | 0.42 | 41.50 | 0.972 | 0.874 | 1.2 | 40.67 | 0.967 | 0.864 | 1.2 | 36.67 | 0.942 | 0.810 | 3.4 |
| Gabor (ours) | 0.41 | 42.61 | 0.974 | 0.883 | 2.5 | 41.39 | 0.968 | 0.871 | 2.5 | 37.53 | 0.947 | 0.830 | 4.2 |