An explainable hybrid deep learning-enabled intelligent fault detection and diagnosis approach for automotive software systems validation

The application of computer vision is gradually increasing across various domains. They employ deep learning models with a black-box nature. Without the ability to explain the behavior of neural networks, especially their decision-making processes, it is not possible to recognize their efficiency, predict system failures, or effectively implement them in real-world applications. Due to the inevitable use of deep learning in fully automated driving systems, many methods have been proposed to explain their behavior; however, they suffer from flawed reasoning and unreliable metrics, which have prevented a comprehensive understanding of complex models in autonomous vehicles and hindered the development of truly reliable systems. In this study, we propose a multi-scale attention-based model in which driving decisions are fed into the reasoning component to provide case-specific explanations for each decision simultaneously. For quantitative evaluation of our model's performance, we employ the F1-score metric, and also proposed a new metric called the Joint F1 score to demonstrate the accurate and reliable performance of the model in terms of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). In addition to the BDD-OIA dataset, the nu-AR dataset is utilized to further validate the generalization capability and robustness of the proposed network. The results demonstrate the superiority of our reasoning network over the classic and state-of-the-art models.

Reliable validation of autonomous driving cyber-physical systems requires testing not only nominal driving behavior but also failures arising from faults in sensing and embedded computation. Physical road testing provides realistic system behavior but is costly and difficult to reproduce, while simulation enables scalable evaluation but cannot fully capture hardware-dependent behavior and fault propagation. Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) validation bridges this gap by executing the driving stack on real embedded hardware within a simulated environment. However, preparing fault-augmented scenarios for HIL testing remains largely a manual process, limiting test coverage, scalability, and efficiency. We present FaultGene, an LLM-assisted framework for automated generation of executable fault-augmented tests for HIL fault-resilience validation. Given a baseline Scenic/CARLA scenario and a structured fault specification, FaultGene generates a fault-augmented test case that captures the effects of HIL-level fault injection. During offline refinement, semantic-consistency checks and execution-level feedback are used to correct candidates that fail to preserve the intended scenario context or produce the desired fault-induced degradation, and to construct high-quality supervision for fine-tuning. The resulting generator then produces fault-augmented tests directly at deployment time without requiring manually engineered reference executions or repeated refinement loops.

Fault detection for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) has received increasing attention in recent years. While more advanced hybrid approaches have been proposed to combine multiple sources of information and outperform earlier techniques, they often incur substantial computational overhead, limiting scalability and practicality in real-world settings. In this paper, we introduce Concept-Aware Fault Detection (CAFD), a learning-based approach that achieves superior fault detection performance by effectively integrating multiple information sources while maintaining practical efficiency. Specifically, CAFD is trained using a carefully selected set of informative features, including model-based signals derived from the DNN's outputs, distance-based features, and a novel concept-based feature, called Concept Failure Ratio (CFR). CFR leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to extract textual concepts from images and quantify the likelihood that their presence is associated with DNN failures. By incorporating this feature, CAFD benefits from complementary semantic information, enabling more effective fault detection. Our results demonstrate that CFR serves as an effective indicator for DNN fault detection. We conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of CAFD, comparing it against five state-of-the-art baselines across three subject DNN models and datasets, including ImageNet. Across a wide range of constrained selection budgets, CAFD consistently outperforms all baselines in Fault Detection Rate (FDR), achieving average FDR improvements of 18.3% across all investigated subjects and budget sizes.