Using Vision Language Foundation Models to Generate Plant Simulation Configurations via In-Context Learning

Vision-based reinforcement learning holds strong potential for decision-making in controlled environment agriculture (CEA). However, its development is hindered by the scarcity of labelled crop images. To address this gap, LettuceVisSim, a lettuce growth simulator that generates labelled time series of crop images, was developed and validated. The simulator contains a process-based model (PBM) for shoot dry weight dynamics, a canopy layout algorithm for deriving canopy layout representations from shoot dry weight, and a Unity rendering engine for image generation. Five findings support the simulator. First, the PBM reproduced shoot dry weight under dynamic plant-density management with $\mathrm{R}^{2}=0.84$. Second, a piecewise cubic regression mapped shoot dry weight to potential projected area with $\mathrm{R}^{2}=0.94$. Third, the canopy layout representation was validated using 12 experimental datasets each having different dynamic environmental and spacing conditions. It reproduced the ground coverage ratio dynamics observed in measured images, achieving $\mathrm{R}^{2}=0.84$ when driven by measured shoot dry weight and $\mathrm{R}^{2}=0.40$ (0.76 excluding one outlier) when driven by PBM-simulated values. Fourth, the Unity rendering engine converted canopy layout representations into RGB and segmentation images at less than 10~ms. Fifth, a demonstration showed that a lighting-control policy can be learned and applied by observing only crop images that were generated with LettuceVisSim, providing a proof of concept of vision-based reinforcement learning in CEA using LettuceVisSim.

Vision-language models (VLMs) show promise for agricultural classification, but zero-shot performance on disease, pest, damage, quality, and species identification remains poor, and it is unclear whether this reflects weak visual features or a failure to connect them to domain knowledge. We build a benchmark of 116 datasets, 834 classes, and 8,324 images spanning these tasks to isolate where the gap arises. Linear probing shows VLM vision encoders already encode agricultural features nearly as separable as a self-supervised DINOv3 baseline, ruling out weak visual representations as the primary bottleneck. Conditioning each model on an oracle reference description (an upper bound on its parametric knowledge) closes most of the gap left by an unaided lower bound, showing VLMs already know more about agriculture than they show. To close this gap without an oracle description at inference time, we structure test-time reasoning around a fixed, per-task diagnostic rubric: the model generates $K$ candidate responses and a Probabilistic Pivot Tournament (PPT) verifier, scored pairwise against the rubric, selects the best one. This nearly doubles judged F1 over the lower bound and matches or exceeds the upper bound on several tasks, notably pushing Gemma 4 E4B-it's disease F1 to 0.71, above its own upper bound of 0.60. However, the verifier's letter-scale confidence score has the opposite of its intended effect: filtering to its most confident predictions does not improve accuracy and correlates negatively with correctness across every model and pool size tested, so the score cannot serve as a measure of predictive uncertainty, and most of the observed gain likely comes from rubric-grounded generation rather than pairwise verification.

Microscopic imaging provides essential visual evidence for studying plant biology and pathology at the cellular and subcellular levels. However, existing benchmarks on vision-language models primarily focus on macroscopic plant imagery, while the microscopic domain remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present PlantMicro, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) in microscopic plant imagery. PlantMicro integrates more than 5,000 images collected across diverse hosts, biological domains, and imaging modalities. Building on this diversity, we design a set of complementary tasks that capture different facets of microscopic image understanding. To support these tasks, we construct over 9,000 VQA pairs that systematically evaluate the capabilities of VLMs. Experiments on PlantMicro show that current VLMs struggle with fine-grained recognition and biologically grounded reasoning. For example, GPT-5 achieves 34.93% accuracy on the pathogen classification task, which is only modestly above the random-guessing baseline. The results highlight a significant gap in current VLMs' ability to comprehend plant microscopic images. PlantMicro provides a standardized foundation for advancing VLMs toward reliable and comprehensive microscopy-level plant understanding.