LettuceVisSim: A Simulator That Generates Lettuce Image Time-series for Vision-Based Reinforcement Learning

This study presents a closed-loop robotic strawberry harvesting system that combines a robust vision module, simulation-trained deep reinforcement learning (DRL) control, and ROS-based realrobot execution. For perception, we propose HRAttnEdge-YOLO26-seg, a modified YOLO26-seg architecture that incorporates a high-resolution P2 branch, segmentation-path attention, and edgesupervised prototype learning to improve instance segmentation in cluttered scenes. For control, we train a target-conditioned Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) policy in Isaac Lab to produce smooth joint-position commands for a UR10e manipulator and deploy it on a UR10e robot for targetfruit reaching and harvesting. This simulation-based approach reduces hardware dependency, lowers development cost, and allows scalable policy training without exhaustive physical trials before real deployment. The proposed vision model demonstrated the highest overall performance among the evaluated methods. On both self-collected and public datasets, the model showed a 10 to 14% improvement in segmentation performance. In controlled in-house tests, the PPO controller produced stable and dynamically smoother motion than a inverse kinematics (IK)-based MoveIt baseline. In greenhouse trials, the proposed integrated system harvested 281 strawberries, achieving 96.6% reaching success, 91.3% grasp-and-pull success, and 84.3% overall harvesting success. These results illustrate that task-specific perception combined with simulation-trained PPO can serve as a practical and resource-efficient alternative to conventional planner-dependent reaching in manipulation, enabling reliable closed-loop robotic harvesting in complex agricultural environments.

The strong performance of large vision-language models (VLMs) trained with reinforcement learning (RL) has motivated similar approaches for fine-tuning vision-language-action (VLA) models in robotics. Many recent works fine-tune VLAs directly in the real world to avoid addressing the sim-to-real gap. While real-world RL circumvents sim-to-real issues, it inherently limits the generality of the resulting VLA, as scaling scene and object diversity in the physical world is prohibitively difficult. This leads to the paradoxical outcome of transforming a broadly pretrained model into an overfitted, scene-specific policy. Training in simulation can instead provide access to diverse scenes, but designing those scenes is also costly. In this work, we show that VLAs can be RL fine-tuned across broad scene and object distributions and with reduced labor by leveraging 3D world generative models. Using these models together with a language-driven scene designer, we generate 100 diverse interactive scenes containing unique objects and backgrounds, enabling scalable and highly parallel policy learning. Starting from a pretrained imitation baseline, our approach increases simulation success from 9.7% up to 79.8% while achieving a 1.25$\times$ speedup in task completion time. We further demonstrate successful sim-to-real transfer enabled by the quality of the generated scenes together with domain randomization, improving real-world success from 21.7% to 75% and achieving a 1.13$\times$ speedup. Finally, we further highlight the benefits of leveraging the effectively unlimited data from 3D world generative models through an ablation study showing that increasing scene diversity directly improves zero-shot generalization.

Vision-language models (VLMs) show promise for agricultural classification, but zero-shot performance on disease, pest, damage, quality, and species identification remains poor, and it is unclear whether this reflects weak visual features or a failure to connect them to domain knowledge. We build a benchmark of 116 datasets, 834 classes, and 8,324 images spanning these tasks to isolate where the gap arises. Linear probing shows VLM vision encoders already encode agricultural features nearly as separable as a self-supervised DINOv3 baseline, ruling out weak visual representations as the primary bottleneck. Conditioning each model on an oracle reference description (an upper bound on its parametric knowledge) closes most of the gap left by an unaided lower bound, showing VLMs already know more about agriculture than they show. To close this gap without an oracle description at inference time, we structure test-time reasoning around a fixed, per-task diagnostic rubric: the model generates $K$ candidate responses and a Probabilistic Pivot Tournament (PPT) verifier, scored pairwise against the rubric, selects the best one. This nearly doubles judged F1 over the lower bound and matches or exceeds the upper bound on several tasks, notably pushing Gemma 4 E4B-it's disease F1 to 0.71, above its own upper bound of 0.60. However, the verifier's letter-scale confidence score has the opposite of its intended effect: filtering to its most confident predictions does not improve accuracy and correlates negatively with correctness across every model and pool size tested, so the score cannot serve as a measure of predictive uncertainty, and most of the observed gain likely comes from rubric-grounded generation rather than pairwise verification.