Emotional Validation is a psychotherapy communication technique that involves recognizing, understanding, and explicitly acknowledging another person's feelings and actions, which strengthens alliance and reduces negative affect. To maximize the emotional support provided by validation, it is crucial to deliver it with appropriate timing and frequency. This study investigates validation timing detection from the speech perspective. Leveraging both paralinguistic and emotional information, we propose a paralinguistic- and emotion-aware model for validation timing detection without relying on textual context. Specifically, we first conduct continued self-supervised training and fine-tuning on different HuBERT backbones to obtain (i) a paralinguistics-aware Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) encoder and (ii) a multi-task speech emotion classification encoder. We then fuse these encoders and further fine-tune the combined model on the downstream validation timing detection task. Experimental evaluations on the TUT Emotional Storytelling Corpus (TESC) compare multiple models, fusion mechanisms, and training strategies, and demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves significant improvements over conventional speech baselines. Our results indicate that non-linguistic speech cues, when integrated with affect-related representations, carry sufficient signal to decide when validation should be expressed, offering a speech-first pathway toward more empathetic human-robot interaction.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Architecture of the proposed method. The method consists of (1) a multitask speech emotion recognition model, (2) a paralinguistic-aware self-supervised learning model, and (3) feature fusion for the validation timing detection task.
Dataset
#Validation
#Non-Validation
TESC
489
881
-train
340
579
-val
74
157
-test
75
145
Table 1: Distribution of the dataset
V-Prec.
V-F1
NV-F1
M-F1
Language Model
BERT
39.96
41.62
66.76
54.19
ModernBERT
41.32
44.65
68.65
56.65
Llama 3.1 8B
- Zero-shot
33.91
49.04
40.48
44.76
- 3-shot
33.69
50.30
46.10
48.20
Table 2: Results of the validation timing detection task [%].
V-Prec.
V-F1
NV-F1
M-F1
Para. HuBERT
52.54
46.27
76.47
61.37
Emo. HuBERT
45.63
52.81
67.94
60.73
Proposed (Ours)
47.96
54.34
70.41
62.37
Table 3: Ablation study [%].
V-Prec.
V-F1
NV-F1
M-F1
Attention
43.81
51.11
66.15
58.63
Gated
44.00
50.29
67.17
58.73
MHA
46.67
50.91
70.55
60.73
Concat (Ours)
47.96
54.34
70.41
62.37
Table 4: Evaluation of different fusion strategies [%].
Para.
Emo.
V-Prec.
V-F1
NV-F1
M-F1
Freeze
Freeze
0.00
0.00
79.45
39.72
Fine T.
Freeze
44.90
50.87
68.16
59.52
Freeze
Fine T.
61.90
27.08
79.65
53.37
LoRA
Fine T.
48.53
46.15
74.07
60.11
Fine T.
LoRA
48.61
47.62
73.72
60.67
Fine T.
Fine T.
47.96
54.34
70.41
62.37
Table 5: Evaluation of different training strategies [%]. Para.: Paralinguistic Encoder; Emo.: Emotion Encoder