PET-F2I: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of LLMs for PET/CT Report Impression Generation
Organizations: Fudan University · Shanghai Academy of Artificial Intelligence for Science · Shanghai Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center · Lanzhou University
Abstract
PET/CT imaging is pivotal in oncology and nuclear medicine, yet summarizing complex findings into precise diagnostic impressions is labor-intensive. While LLMs have shown promise in medical text generation, their capability in the highly specialized domain of PET/CT remains underexplored. We introduce PET-F2I-41K (PET Findings-to-Impression Benchmark), a large-scale benchmark for PET/CT impression generation using LLMs, constructed from over 41k real-world reports. Using PET-F2I-41K, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 27 models across proprietary frontier LLMs, open-source generalist models, and medical-domain LLMs, and we develop a domain-adapted 7B model (PET-F2I-7B) fine-tuned from Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct via LoRA. Beyond standard NLG metrics (e.g., BLEU-4, ROUGE-L, BERTScore), we propose three clinically grounded metrics - Entity Coverage Rate (ECR), Uncovered Entity Rate (UER), and Factual Consistency Rate (FCR) - to assess diagnostic completeness and factual reliability. Experiments reveal that neither frontier nor medical-domain LLMs perform adequately in zero-shot settings. In contrast, PET-F2I-7B achieves substantial gains (e.g., 0.708 BLEU-4) and a 3.0x improvement in entity coverage over the strongest baseline, while offering advantages in cost, latency, and privacy. Beyond this modeling contribution, PET-F2I-41K establishes a standardized evaluation framework to accelerate the development of reliable and clinically deployable reporting systems for PET/CT.
Figures & tables
| Category | Model | BLEU-4 | ROUGE-L | METEOR | BERTScore | SBERT | ECR | UER | FCR |
| Proprietary | Claude Opus 4.5 [ 1 ] | 0.2532 | 0.3520 | 0.5692 | 0.7590 | 0.6433 | 0.5268 | 0.5417 | 0.9814 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 [ 1 ] | 0.2374 | 0.3587 | 0.5369 | 0.7562 | 0.6286 | 0.5222 | 0.5434 | 0.9734 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro [ 7 ] | 0.2112 | 0.4193 | 0.5127 | 0.7643 | 0.6597 | 0.4379 | 0.5152 | 0.9618 | |
| Gemini 2.0 Flash [ 11 ] | 0.1897 | 0.4792 | 0.4653 | 0.7516 | 0.6401 | 0.4153 | 0.4947 | 0.9628 | |
| GPT-4o [ 21 ] | 0.1876 | 0.3248 | 0.4577 | 0.7344 | 0.5990 | 0.4346 | 0.5883 | 0.9756 | |
| GPT-5.1 [ 21 ] | 0.1681 | 0.2963 | 0.4768 | 0.7327 | 0.5888 | 0.4622 | 0.6250 | 0.9898 |
Radiology Report Generation
Radiology report generation uses medical images and clinical context to produce structured, clinically accurate findings and impressions.
See all 159 papers