Human-AI Collaborative Autonomous Experimentation With Proxy Modeling for Comparative Observation

Materials and chemical optimization must choose the next synthesis, characterization, or high-fidelity simulation from sequential observations under a limited budget. Large language models can use task knowledge to propose adjustments, but composing surrogates, acquisition functions, and search strategies is constrained by compatibility, parameter dependencies, and evidence requirements. We present Agentic-MatriBO, a capability-compiled agentic Bayesian optimization (BO) framework that represents BO components and selection conditions as composable capabilities. A language policy proposes BO recipes and candidate plans; a compiler checks proposals against the registered capability catalog; and a deterministic execution layer validates and commits candidates. Oracle observations are stored in research memory and inform later rounds. We compare Agentic-MatriBO with eight baselines on four offline finite candidate pools---COF, PCE10, Buchwald--Hartwig (BH), and Suzuki--Miyaura---using five seeds per condition; results are reported descriptively. Across the four tasks, Agentic-MatriBO has the best mean endpoint quality after orienting each objective so that higher is better. On COF, it reaches the tabulated optimum in all five seeds both in the end-to-end comparison and after shared initialization, where it also retains an advantage in cumulative quality. Its normalized area under the best-so-far quality curve during the BO stage (nAUC-BO) is substantially higher on COF, near parity with the best baseline on PCE10 and BH, and lower on Suzuki. COF ablations show that removing the capability compiler or evidence gate coincides with lower cumulative quality and fewer exact-optimum hits. The framework provides an inspectable interface for evidence-conditioned BO adaptation.

The discovery and development of advanced materials is a challenging process constrained by the high time and monetary costs of synthesis, processing, and characterization. The underlying design spaces can be enormous, often with multiple competing objectives. Bayesian optimization (BO) provides a principled approach for efficiently navigating such spaces, but most workflows rely on fixed exploration-exploitation policies that lack the capacity to adapt to shifting constraints in dynamic campaigns typical of self-driving laboratories. In this work, we develop a multi-objective BO framework for alloy design under resource constraints, benchmarking strategies for adaptive policy tuning at each iteration. Our evaluation covers a septenary refractory high-entropy alloy (RHEA) system focused on maximizing melting temperature and minimizing density, and an Fe-Co-Ni-based soft magnetic alloy system targeting saturation magnetization, coercivity, and hardness. We compare an exploitation-focused strategy, a fixed mixed exploratory/exploitative policy, and two distinct LLM-based adaptive strategies with different approaches to batch allocation and campaign signal interpretation, evaluated across baseline and mid-campaign resource event conditions including budget reductions, timeline cuts, and combined disruptions. Our results show that mixed allocation strategies accumulate substantially more mutual information than the exploitation-focused baseline at a proportionally smaller cost to hypervolume and optimization speed, with adaptive strategies outperforming a fixed-mixed allocation policy by adjusting their allocation in response to both evolving campaign statistics and resource constraints. These findings suggest that adaptive resource allocation offers a favorable tradeoff for materials discovery campaigns in reducing predictive uncertainty on Pareto-optimal compositions.

Bayesian optimization (BO) is an optimization method that sequentially proposes the next candidate explainable variables for optimizing target variables by balancing exploration and exploitation. BO is often used under a limited evaluation budget, such as hyperparameter tuning of deep learning. Despite its effectiveness, conventional BO may have poor convergence in practical experimental science where each evaluation is often costly and time-consuming. Recently, BO methods have been proposed that accelerate optimization by using pseudo-experimental data that simulate experimental data. However, when only a limited number of experimental data are available, the generated pseudo-experimental data may be of insufficient quality. In this study, we developed PolyBO to improve optimization time by generating high-quality pseudo-experimental data even when the number of trials is limited. PolyBO performs BO efficiently by generating pseudo-experimental data with an adaptively updated versatile parametric model. This low-capacity polynomial regression model is intended to enable efficient BO even with limited experimental data. PolyBO updates the BO surrogate model with a combined dataset consisting of experimental data and pseudo-experimental data and then performs optimization. Using synthetic benchmark functions with diverse landscapes, we found that PolyBO reduced the optimization time by a median of 42%. For a real-world material composition optimization problem, PolyBO reduced the optimization time by a median of 96% compared with conventional methods. Overall, PolyBO achieves efficient optimization in settings where each experiment requires a long time.