Breaking the Tuning Barrier: Zero-Hyperparameters Yield Multi-Corner Analysis Via Learned Priors

Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven electronic design automation (EDA) techniques have been extensively explored for VLSI circuit design applications. Most recently, foundation AI models for circuits have emerged as a new technology trend. Unlike traditional task-specific AI solutions, these new AI models are developed through two stages: 1) self-supervised pre-training on a large amount of unlabeled data to learn intrinsic circuit properties; and 2) efficient fine-tuning for specific downstream applications, such as early-stage design quality evaluation, circuit-related context generation, and functional verification. This new paradigm brings many advantages: model generalization, less reliance on labeled circuit data, efficient adaptation to new tasks, and unprecedented generative capability. In this paper, we propose referring to AI models developed with this new paradigm as circuit foundation models (CFMs). This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the latest progress in circuit foundation models, unprecedentedly covering over 130 relevant works. Over 90% of our introduced works were published in or after 2022, indicating that this emerging research trend has attracted wide attention in a short period. In this survey, we propose to categorize all existing circuit foundation models into two primary types: 1) encoder-based methods performing general circuit representation learning for predictive tasks; and 2) decoder-based methods leveraging large language models (LLMs) for generative tasks. For our introduced works, we cover their input modalities, model architecture, pre-training strategies, domain adaptation techniques, and downstream design applications. In addition, this paper discussed the unique properties of circuits from the data perspective. These circuit properties have motivated many works in this domain and differentiated them from general AI techniques.

Analog-mixed-signal (AMS) circuits are highly non-linear and operate on continuous real-world signals, making them far more difficult to model with data-driven AI than digital blocks. To close the gap between structured design data (device dimensions, bias voltages, etc.) and real-world performance, we propose a causal-inference framework that first discovers a directed-acyclic graph (DAG) from SPICE simulation data and then quantifies parameter impact through Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimation. The approach yields human-interpretable rankings of design knobs and explicit 'what-if' predictions, enabling designers to understand trade-offs in sizing and topology. We evaluate the pipeline on three operational-amplifier families (OTA, telescopic, and folded-cascode) implemented in TSMC 65nm and benchmark it against a baseline neural-network (NN) regressor. Across all circuits the causal model reproduces simulation-based ATEs with an average absolute error of less than 25%, whereas the neural network deviates by more than 80% and frequently predicts the wrong sign. These results demonstrate that causal AI provides both higher accuracy and explainability, paving the way for more efficient, trustworthy AMS design automation.

Large-scale hyperparameter optimization (HPO) in automated machine learning (AutoML) consumes substantial computational resources, raising growing concerns about scalability and energy efficiency. Existing methods use prior information heuristically to accelerate both black-box and multi-fidelity settings, but they lack a characterization of how prior informativeness quantitatively reduces sample complexity. In this work, we provide the first distribution-dependent sample complexity bounds for multi-fidelity HPO with priors through the formal lens of fixed-budget best-arm identification. By modeling priors directly over arm means as configuration performance, we derive explicit, distribution-dependent error bounds that quantify the relationship between priors and evaluation budget. Our analysis shows that informative priors, which concentrate probability mass on near-optimal arms, yield reductions in the number of required evaluations, whereas baseline performance is recovered with uninformative or misleading priors. We conduct proof-of-concept experiments on a synthetic benchmark and on LCBench, a common multi-fidelity HPO benchmark for deep learning, to confirm our theoretical results, achieving up to 90% budget reduction while retaining solution quality. Together, our results provide a principled foundation for prior-guided and compute-efficient green AutoML.