cs.LGMar 13, 2026

Representation Learning for Spatiotemporal Physical Systems

Authors: Helen Qu, Rudy Morel, Michael McCabe, Alberto Bietti, François Lanusse, Shirley Ho, Yann LeCun

Organizations: Flatiron Institute · Princeton University · Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM · New York University

Abstract

Machine learning approaches to spatiotemporal physical systems have primarily focused on next-frame prediction, with the goal of learning an accurate emulator for the system's evolution in time. However, these emulators are computationally expensive to train and are subject to performance pitfalls, such as compounding errors during autoregressive rollout. In this work, we take a different perspective and look at scientific tasks further downstream of predicting the next frame, such as estimation of a system's governing physical parameters. Accuracy on these tasks offers a uniquely quantifiable glimpse into the physical relevance of the representations of these models. We evaluate the effectiveness of general-purpose self-supervised methods in learning physics-grounded representations that are useful for downstream scientific tasks. Surprisingly, we find that not all methods designed for physical modeling outperform generic self-supervised learning methods on these tasks, and methods that learn in the latent space (e.g., joint embedding predictive architectures, or JEPAs) outperform those optimizing pixel-level prediction objectives. Code is available at https://github.com/helenqu/physical-representation-learning.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Semigroup-JEPA: Latent Dynamics Consistency for Zero-Shot Physics Generalization

    Sep 9, 2026Andy Zeyi Liu, Haoran Sun, Lucas Baker +2World Models for RoboticsLatent Dynamics Modeling

  2. Introductory Notes on Learning2^2

    Sep 6, 2026Sai Siddharth, Maniarasu RaviPhysics-Informed MLDynamical Systems