cs.DCMar 14, 2026

Grassroots Bonds: Financing by the People, for the People

Authors: Ehud Shapiro

Organizations: London School of Economics, UK · Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Abstract

Grassroots currencies turn mutual trust into liquidity: a grassroots coin is a unit of its issuer's debt, backed by the issuer's goods and services, which the issuer must redeem, 1-for-1, against any coin they hold; liquidity arises from mutual credit lines, formed by the voluntary exchange of coins among persons who trust each other. As coins are redeemable 1-for-1, the exchange must be 1-for-1 as well, lest prompt redemption after it leave one party with undue profit. Thus, grassroots coins are incongruent with interest-bearing credit. Here, we extend grassroots currencies to include also grassroots bonds, units of their issuer's debt due at a later date. Upon maturity, the bearer of the bond may redeem it against a coin of the issuer, so liquid coins can be lent against interest-bearing bonds. We specify bonds by adding Date and Escrow clauses to the social contract of grassroots currencies: the contract enforces the redemption of a bond when it is mature according to the date stated by the issuer, who undertakes to keep it current. We show that the voluntary swap of coins and bonds can realise the basic financial instruments: loans, sale of debt, and forward contracts, and, with an escrow agent, loans with payment schedules, options, collateral, guarantees, insurance, credit default swaps, letters of credit, and credit lines. We extend the liquidity ratios of corporate finance to bonds, with maturity as asset class, and prove that a community clears its debts by redemptions exactly when no member owes more than they hold, and that it does so without coordination once dates advance and persons act on their rights. Grassroots currencies that include coins and bonds are implemented in GLP, a concurrent logic programming language running on Dart, as a program derived from the contract and demonstrated by a village market of six agents and an escrow agent.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 23, 2026

Sovereign Grassroots Currencies: A CBDC Architecture for Credit and Monetary Policy (Full Version)

A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is central-bank money in digital form, held by the public. Leading designs have two limitations: conversion from bank deposits into CBDC can accelerate deposit flight, requiring safeguards, and the CBDC stays outside credit creation and monetary-policy operations. Here we present a CBDC architecture based on grassroots currencies that overcomes these limitations. The architecture has three components: (1) Money: sovereign grassroots coins, which are digital debts of one unit of fiat currency issued by the central bank, constituting a direct CBDC; (2) Credit and Liquidity: non-sovereign grassroots coins, which are digital debts of one unit of the same fiat currency, redeemable at par, that can be issued by any person, natural or legal, thus adding credit; and (3) Interest: grassroots bonds, sovereign and non-sovereign, adding maturity and thus interest, standard banking instruments, and the central bank's instruments of monetary policy. The central bank can therefore lend, absorb liquidity, set its rates and buy and sell securities in the coins and bonds the public holds, choosing the counterparties and terms of its credit operations, and without converting bank deposits into newly issued central bank money on demand. We prove that the arbitrage-free price of any non-sovereign grassroots coin whose issuer redeems it on demand is one unit of the fiat currency. The central bank can choose to deal with any counterparty, not just banks, and we argue that the central bank's interest rates on lending and bonds bound from above and below the corresponding interest rates of its counterparties. Sovereign and non-sovereign grassroots coins and bonds have been implemented and tested on a small scale.
Oct 10, 2026

sGLP: Simulating People with Stochastic Agents

Grassroots platforms are designed to be owned, operated and governed by their participants, and thus are constituted from person-to-person smartphone apps that are run by the participants. A grassroots app is specified using a grassroots social contract, which is compiled through an abstraction cascade into a volition-guarded Grassroots Logic Program (vGLP), a multiagent concurrent logic programming language. A vGLP program in turn specifies a smartphone UI via which people express their volitions and thus control the app. Prudence dictates large-scale evaluation and testing of grassroots platforms prior to deployment, but using the many people needed to do that is a contradiction in terms. Hence another solution is needed. Here, we present stochastic GLP (sGLP), designed to allow grassroots platforms to be simulated at scale from the vGLP programs that deploy them, with stochastic agents in place of people. sGLP is GLP with a rate extension for specifying stochastic behaviour. A stochastic agent is an sGLP program replacing both the vGLP UI and the person behind it. It is typed by the dual of the interactive type of the UI and specifies a stochastic profile of a person's behaviour. We demonstrate sGLP on the grassroots social graph, with a population of men and women drawn from four stochastic profiles --- homophile or indifferent, wary or sociable --- and on grassroots currencies, with four profiles --- spenders or savers, cautious or generous --- and report what the mix of profiles does to the social graph that forms and to the currencies that circulate. We prove that every run of a vGLP program in which sGLP agents replace the UI and the people behind it is a vGLP run. We implemented sGLP in GLP by Gillespie's method, and ran reproducible simulations with it.
Jul 23, 2026

GLP: A Grassroots, Multiagent, Concurrent, Logic Programming Language for AI

A grassroots platform is a multiagent distributed system in which multiple independent instances can form and operate independently of each other and of any global resource, yet may coalesce into ever larger instances, possibly resulting in a single global instance. Grassroots platforms aim to offer an egalitarian/democratic alternative to centralised/autocratic and decentralised/plutocratic global platforms. Here, we present Grassroots Logic Programs (GLP), a multiagent concurrent logic programming language designed for the implementation of grassroots platforms: we recall the standard operational semantics of logic programs; introduce the concurrent operational semantics of GLP as its restriction; recall multiagent atomic transactions; use them to introduce a multiagent operational semantics of GLP; and prove multiagent GLP to be grassroots. The grassroots social graph—the foundational grassroots platform on which all others are based—serves as a GLP programming example.