Denoising generative models have recently become the dominant paradigm for dexterous grasp generation, owing to their ability to model complex grasp distributions from large-scale data. However, existing diffusion-based methods typically formulate generation as a stochastic differential equation (SDE), which often requires many sequential denoising steps and introduces trajectory instability that can lead to physically infeasible grasps. In this paper, we propose EFF-Grasp, a novel Flow-Matching-based framework for physics-aware dexterous grasp generation. Specifically, we reformulate grasp synthesis as a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE) process, which enables efficient and stable generation through smooth probability flows. To further enforce physical feasibility, we introduce a training-free physics-aware energy guidance strategy. Our method defines an energy-guided target distribution using adapted explicit physical energy functions that capture key grasp constraints, and estimates the corresponding guidance term via a local Monte Carlo approximation during inference. In this way, EFF-Grasp dynamically steers the generation trajectory toward physically feasible regions without requiring additional physics-based training or simulation feedback. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets show that EFF-Grasp achieves superior performance in grasp quality and physical feasibility, while requiring substantially fewer sampling steps than diffusion-based baselines.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Visualization of the physics-aware generation process in EFF-Grasp.
Figure 2: Overview of the EFF-Grasp sampling process. The method integrates Flow Matching with the training-free physics-aware guidance strategy. By evaluating candidate grasps using energy fields via local Monte Carlo sampling, we compute the physical energy field to guide the ODE trajectory towards physically feasible regions.
Method
DexGraspNet
UniDexGrasp
DexGRAB
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Div ↑
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Div ↑
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Div ↑
UniDexGrasp [ 38 ]
33.9
70.1
31.9
0.14
23.7
65.5
24.5
0.14
20.8
55.8
37.4
0.08
GraspTTA [ 12 ]
18.6
67.8
24.5
0.13
21.0
65.3
21.2
0.10
14.4
51.0
51.4
0.10
SceneDiffuser [ 10 ]
26.6
66.9
31.0
0.15
28.3
74.8
25.1
0.15
39.1
85.0
41.1
0.12
UGG [ 24 ]
46.9
79.0
25.2
0.14
46.0
83.2
24.5
0.14
42.7
90.6
33.2
0.12
DGA [ 41 ]
53.6
90.4
21.5
0.22
54.8
90.8
18.9
0.25
56.5
91.8
28.6
0.12
Table 1: Quantitative comparison on three large-scale datasets. Best results are in bold , and second-best are underlined .
Method
MultiDex
RealDex
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Div ↑
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Div ↑
UniDexGrasp [ 38 ]
21.6
47.5
13.5
0.08
27.1
59.4
39.0
0.11
GraspTTA [ 12 ]
30.3
62.8
19.0
0.11
13.3
46.4
40.1
0.09
SceneDiffuser [ 10 ]
69.8
85.6
14.6
0.27
21.7
56.1
42.0
0.09
UGG [ 24 ]
55.3
93.4
10.3
0.12
32.7
63.4
34.4
0.10
DGA [ 41 ]
72.2
96.3
9.6
0.23
34.6
71.2
23.1
0.14
Table 2: Quantitative comparison on small-scale and real-world datasets. Best results are in bold , and second-best are underlined .
Figure 3: Visualization of generation results produced by our method across all datasets.
Figure 4: Compared to the SOTA method DGA, EFF-Grasp generates more stable and physically feasible grasps (see the boxed failure cases of DGA).
Figure 5: Comparison of Success Rate and Penetration Depth versus NFE on MultiDex and RealDex datasets. The left y-axis represents the Success Rate (%), and the right y-axis indicates the Penetration Depth (mm). Solid lines denote our method, while dashed lines represent the DGA baseline. Our method consistently outperforms DGA, achieving significantly higher success rates and lower penetration depths, particularly demonstrating faster convergence at lower NFEs.
ID
Model Variant
SRF
ERF
SPF
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Div. ↑
a
Baseline (Vanilla FM)
47.0
90.7
17.1
0.16
b
+ SRF
✓
48.0
91.2
16.0
0.16
c
+ ERF
✓
45.5
90.4
14.7
0.15
d
+ SRF & ERF
✓
✓
47.1
90.8
15.4
0.15
e
+ SRF & ERF & SPF
✓
✓
✓
67.2
91.2
20.7
0.16
f
+ SRF & ERF & SPF (Original forms)
✓
✓
✓
66.7
91.1
20.7
0.16
Table 3: Ablation study of physical energy functions on DexGraspNet.
Figure 6: Qualitative visualization of the ablation study. Variant e yields the optimal results (bolded in Table 3 ), validating the effectiveness of our proposed energy terms over the baseline (a) and original forms (f).
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
DexGraspNet → UniDexGrasp
DexGraspNet → DexGRAB
DexGraspNet → RealDex
DexGraspNet → MultiDex
70.0
93.5
19.8
60.8
91.0
23.8
41.0
80.1
18.6
61.0
93.4
8.0
UniDexGrasp → DexGraspNet
UniDexGrasp → DexGRAB
UniDexGrasp → RealDex
UniDexGrasp → MultiDex
67.2
91.5
21.6
60.6
91.7
24.1
42.8
78.8
20.2
59.4
94.1
9.5
DexGRAB → RealDex
DexGRAB → MultiDex
RealDex → DexGRAB
RealDex → MultiDex
29.0
58.5
26.1
55.0
94.7
9.6
61.0
91.3
23.5
51.9
90.0
8.3
Table 4: EFF-Grasp achieves superior cross-dataset generalization performance.
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
DexGraspNet → UniDexGrasp
DexGraspNet → DexGRAB
DexGraspNet → RealDex
DexGraspNet → MultiDex
70.0
93.5
19.8
60.8
91.0
23.8
41.0
80.1
18.6
61.0
93.4
8.0
UniDexGrasp → DexGraspNet
UniDexGrasp → DexGRAB
UniDexGrasp → RealDex
UniDexGrasp → MultiDex
67.2
91.5
21.6
60.6
91.7
24.1
42.8
78.8
20.2
59.4
94.1
9.5
DexGRAB → DexGraspNet
DexGRAB → UniDexGrasp
DexGRAB → RealDex
DexGRAB → MultiDex
63.4
89.2
20.4
63.6
90.3
18.9
29.0
58.5
26.1
55.0
94.7
9.6
Appendix
Table 5: EFF-Grasp achieves superior cross-dataset generalization performance.
Guidance Scale s
0
10
30
50
100
Suc.6 (%)
65.9
78.8
77.5
69.1
26.9
Suc.1 (%)
95.0
98.8
97.5
95.6
50.3
Pen. (mm)
15.2
16.2
10.5
18.7
19.9
Appendix
Table 6: Sensitivity to Guidance Scale s .
Temperature τ
0.01
0.05
0.1
1.0
Suc.6 (%)
7.2
77.5
77.8
70.9
Suc.1 (%)
19.7
97.5
97.5
96.6
Pen. (mm)
21.0
10.5
18.9
14.8
Appendix
Table 7: Sensitivity to Temperature τ .
Component
Weight
Suc.6 ↑
Suc.1 ↑
Pen. ↓
wERF
0.1
76.9
97.5
19.9
0.25
77.5
98.8
18.7
0.4
77.5
97.5
10.5
0.5
77.5
97.8
13.1
1.0
70.3
95.3
16.3
wSPF
0.1
72.8
96.8
12.5
Appendix
Table 8: Sensitivity to Energy Field Weights. We vary each weight component while fixing the others to the default value (0.4).
Figure 7: Additional visualization of grasps generated by EFF-Grasp on various objects from different datasets.
Task-oriented dexterous grasp generation aims to produce dexterous grasp poses that are both physically plausible and functionally suitable for specified manipulation tasks. Existing diffusion-based methods often address these two requirements in a decoupled manner: they first train a grasp diffusion model for task alignment and then rely on post-generation refinement to improve physical plausibility. However, this after-the-fact correction strategy applies physical plausibility guidance only once the grasp has already been generated, leaving the generation trajectory itself unguided by physical constraints and potentially leading to suboptimal grasps. To address this problem, we propose a novel framework that directly injects physical plausibility guidance into the denoising process of a task-aligned grasp diffusion model in a practical and effective manner, even when physical plausibility constraints are non-differentiable. This allows physical plausibility to shape grasp generation throughout denoising while preserving task alignment. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of our framework.
Diffusion models sample effectively from high-dimensional, multimodal distributions, but their outputs may violate deployment constraints. For task-space robot policies, generated grasps, waypoints, or trajectories can be distributionally valid yet infeasible, violating reachability, collision-avoidance, or closed-loop executability requirements. This embodiment gap limits zero-shot deployment across robots, even when the task-space behavior itself is transferable. We propose an inference-time optimization framework that couples the behavior generation to physical feasibility by formulating diffusion guidance as a constrained optimization problem. Our key insight is to replace the sampling perturbation in the backward process with an optimized correction, allowing hard constraints or soft penalties to be imposed during sampling without the need to retrain the diffusion model, while keeping samples close to the learned prior. We evaluate the method on dexterous grasp synthesis with reachability and collision-avoidance constraints, and dynamic manipulation with controller-level trackability constraints. Across settings and robot embodiments, optimization-guided denoising matches the feasibility of projection- and gradient-guidance baselines while better preserving grasp quality, and improving controller-level executability and task success, with task success improving by up to 20pp. on dexterous grasping and 23pp. on visuomotor manipulation over the best baseline.
Dexterous grasp generation that considers arm-related constraints is crucial in real-world scenarios involving arm environment collision avoidance, workspace boundary grasps, and consecutive grasping. Existing hand-centric grasp models, which primarily focus on the floating hand's pose, are insufficient for such cases. Conventional arm-aware methods either rely on rejection sampling to discard infeasible samples or require retraining on arm-specific data, leading to low sample efficiency under adverse conditions or limited generalization across different robots and environments. To overcome these limitations, this letter presents an arm-aware dexterous grasp generation framework that leverages pretrained arm-agnostic grasp models while integrating arm and environmental information only at inference time. Specifically, we formulate arm-aware constrained grasp generation as a joint optimization of hand pose and arm configuration, and derive closed-form gradients for arm-related constraints. Assuming the hand pose distribution is represented by a diffusion model, we prove that gradient-based optimization is equivalent to guided diffusion sampling, steering near-feasible samples toward the feasible region. Through comprehensive evaluation involving 10k objects across 6 scenarios, we demonstrate that the proposed framework generates feasible grasps in highly constrained settings with significantly higher probability, highlighting its advantages in real-world applications. Supplementary materials and appendix are available at https://arm-aware-dexgrasp.github.io/.