eess.SYFeb 25, 2026

The Port-Hamiltonian Structure of Vehicle Manipulator Systems

Authors: Ramy Rashad

Organizations: Control and Instrumentation Engineering department and Interdisciplinary Research Center for Smart Mobility and Logistics, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 34464, Saudi Arabia

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

This paper presents a port-Hamiltonian formulation of vehicle-manipulator systems (VMS), a broad class of robotic systems including aerial manipulators, underwater manipulators, space robots, and omnidirectional mobile manipulators. Unlike existing Lagrangian formulations that obscure the underlying energetic structure, the proposed port-Hamiltonian formulation explicitly reveals the energy flow and conservation properties of these complex mechanical systems. We derive the port-Hamiltonian dynamics from first principles using Hamiltonian reduction theory. Two complementary formulations are presented: a standard form that directly exposes the energy structure, and an inertially-decoupled form that leverages the principal bundle structure of the VMS configuration space and is particularly suitable for control design and numerical simulation. The coordinate-free geometric approach we follow avoids singularities associated with local parameterizations of the base orientation. We rigorously establish the mathematical equivalence between our port-Hamiltonian formulations and existing reduced Euler-Lagrange and Boltzmann-Hamel equations found in the robotics and geometric mechanics literature.

Figures & tables

Figure 1: Illustration of vehicle-manipulator systems. Left figure shows a floating-base manipulator h∈Gb=SE(3)h\in G_{b}=SE(3) while the right figure shows a ground mobile manipulator h∈Gb=S1×R2h\in G_{b}=\mathbb{S}^{1}\times\mathbb{R}^{2} .
Map/VariableCoordinate-freeCoordinate-based
(v,q˙)(\text{v},\dot{q})gb×TqQm\mathfrak{g}_{b}\times T_{q}Q_{m}Rb×Rn\mathbb{R}^{b}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}
(w,τ)(\text{w},\tau)gb∗×Tq∗Qm\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}\times T_{q}^{*}Q_{m}Rb×Rn\mathbb{R}^{b}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}
Jii,s(q)J_{i}^{i,s}(q)gb×TqQm→gis\mathfrak{g}_{b}\times T_{q}Q_{m}\rightarrow\mathfrak{g}_{i}^{s}R6×(b+n)\mathbb{R}^{6\times(b+n)}
Jii,b(q)J_{i}^{i,b}(q)TqQm→gibT_{q}Q_{m}\rightarrow\mathfrak{g}_{i}^{b}R6×n\mathbb{R}^{6\times n}
Mb(q)M_{b}(q)gb→gb∗\mathfrak{g}_{b}\rightarrow{\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}}Rb×b\mathbb{R}^{b\times b}
Mbm(q)M_{bm}(q)TqQm→gb∗T_{q}Q_{m}\rightarrow{\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}}Rb×n\mathbb{R}^{b\times n}
Table 1: Coordinate-free and coordinate-based representations of maps and variables in ( 21 )
Figure 2: Port-Hamiltonian formulation of fixed-base manipulator dynamics.
Figure 3: Port-Hamiltonian formulation of moving-base dynamics.
Map/VariableCoordinate-freeCoordinate-based
(p˙,∂Hkin∂p)(\dot{\text{p}},\frac{\partial\mathcal{H}_{\text{kin}}}{\partial\text{p}})gb∗×gb\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}\times\mathfrak{g}_{b}Rb×Rb\mathbb{R}^{b}\times\mathbb{R}^{b}
(q˙,∂Hkin∂q)(\dot{q},\frac{\partial\mathcal{H}_{\text{kin}}}{\partial q})TqQm×Tq∗QmT_{q}Q_{m}\times T_{q}^{*}Q_{m}Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}
(π˙,∂Hkin∂π)(\dot{\pi},\frac{\partial\mathcal{H}_{\text{kin}}}{\partial\pi})Tq∗Qm×TqQmT_{q}^{*}Q_{m}\times T_{q}Q_{m}Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}
adp∼ad_{\text{p}}^{\sim}gb→gb∗\mathfrak{g}_{b}\rightarrow\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}Rb×b\mathbb{R}^{b\times b}
J(p)\mathcal{J}(\text{p})Tx∗X→TxXT_{x}^{*}\mathcal{X}\rightarrow T_{x}\mathcal{X}R(b+2n)×(b+2n)\mathbb{R}^{(b+2n)\times(b+2n)}
G\mathcal{G}gb∗×Tq∗Qm→TxX\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}\times T_{q}^{*}Q_{m}\rightarrow T_{x}\mathcal{X}R(b+2n)×(b+n)\mathbb{R}^{(b+2n)\times(b+n)}
Table 2: Coordinate-free and coordinate-based representations of maps and variables in ( 47 )
Figure 4: Principal bundle structure of the VMS configuration space Q=Gb×QmQ=G_{b}\times Q_{m} .
MapCoordinate-freeCoordinate-based
A(q)A(q)TqQm→gb{T_{q}Q_{m}}\rightarrow{\mathfrak{g}_{b}}Rb×n\mathbb{R}^{b\times n}
Φ(p,q)\Phi(\text{p},q)TxX→Tx^XT_{x}\mathcal{X}\rightarrow T_{\hat{x}}\mathcal{X}R(b+2n)×(b+2n)\mathbb{R}^{(b+2n)\times(b+2n)}
L(p,q)L(\text{p},q)TqQm→Tq∗QmT_{q}Q_{m}\rightarrow T_{q}^{*}Q_{m}Rn×n\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}
Nb(p^,q^)N_{b}(\hat{\text{p}},\hat{q})Tq^Qm→gbT_{\hat{q}}Q_{m}\rightarrow\mathfrak{g}_{b}Rb×n\mathbb{R}^{b\times n}
N^m(q^,π^)\hat{N}_{m}(\hat{q},\hat{\pi})Tq^Qm→Tq^∗QmT_{\hat{q}}Q_{m}\rightarrow T_{\hat{q}}^{*}Q_{m}Rn×n\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}
B(p^,q^)B(\hat{\text{p}},\hat{q})Tq^Qm→Tq^∗Qm{T_{\hat{q}}Q_{m}}\rightarrow{T_{\hat{q}}^{*}Q_{m}}Rn×n\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}
Table 3: Coordinate-free and coordinate-based representations of maps in ( 59 )
Figure 5: The proposed port-Hamiltonian formulations of VMS dynamics and their corresponding Dirac structures. Left figure shows the port-Hamiltonian formulation ( 47 ) while the right figure shows the inertially-decoupled port-Hamiltonian formulation ( 59 ). The intermediate figure illustrates the change of coordinates ϕ(q)\phi(q) .
MapCoordinate-freeCoordinate-based
Pb(q,q˙)P_{b}(q,\dot{q})gb→gb{\mathfrak{g}_{b}}\rightarrow{\mathfrak{g}_{b}}Rb×b\mathbb{R}^{b\times b}
Eb(v^,q)E_{b}(\hat{\text{v}},q)TqQm→gb{T_{q}Q_{m}}\rightarrow{\mathfrak{g}_{b}}Rb×n\mathbb{R}^{b\times n}
C^m(q,q˙)\hat{C}_{m}(q,\dot{q})TqQm→Tq∗Qm{T_{q}Q_{m}}\rightarrow{T_{q}^{*}Q_{m}}Rn×n\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}
B^(v^,q^)\hat{B}(\hat{\text{v}},\hat{q})Tq^Qm→Tq^∗Qm{T_{\hat{q}}Q_{m}}\rightarrow{T_{\hat{q}}^{*}Q_{m}}Rn×n\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}
M^,C^1,C^2\hat{\mathcal{M}},\hat{\mathcal{C}}_{1},\hat{\mathcal{C}}_{2}gb×TqQm→gb∗×Tq∗Qm{\mathfrak{g}_{b}\times T_{q}Q_{m}}\rightarrow{\mathfrak{g}_{b}^{*}\times T_{q}^{*}Q_{m}}R(b+n)×(b+n)\mathbb{R}^{(b+n)\times(b+n)}
Table 4: Coordinate-free and coordinate-based representations of maps in ( 85 )
More in this topic

Robotics

Robotics studies the design and control of machines that perceive, move, and act in physical environments.

See all 751 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList

  1. Structure- and Stability-Preserving Learning of Port-Hamiltonian Systems

    Apr 14, 2026Binh Nguyen, Nam T. Nguyen, Truong X. NghiemPort-Hamiltonian SystemsHamiltonian Neural Networks

    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA

  2. Port-Hamiltonian Koopman Operator Synthesis for Mechanical Systems

    Sep 15, 2026Rajpal Singh, Aditya Singh, Jishnu KeshavanRobot Dynamics IdentificationKoopman Operator Learning

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India

  3. Co-Learning Port-Hamiltonian Systems and Optimal Energy-Shaping Control

    Apr 28, 2026Ankur Kamboj, Biswadip Dey, Vaibhav SrivastavaDynamical SystemsFeedback Control

    Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 · Meta Reality Labs, Redmond, WA 98052