VC-Soup: Value-Consistency Guided Multi-Value Alignment for Large Language Models
Organizations: Key Laboratory of Knowledge Engineering with Big Data, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui, China · Innovation School of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei University of Technology
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape content generation, interaction, and decision-making across the Web, aligning them with human values has become a central objective in trustworthy AI. This challenge becomes even more pronounced when aligning multiple, potentially conflicting human values. Although recent approaches, such as reward reweighting, prompt-based supervised fine-tuning, and model merging, attempt to tackle multi-value alignment, they still face two major limitations: (1) training separate models for each value combination is prohibitively expensive; (2) value conflicts substantially degrade alignment performance. These limitations make it difficult to achieve favorable trade-offs across diverse human values. To address these challenges, we revisit multi-value alignment from the perspective of value consistency in data and propose VC-soup, a data filtering and parameter merging framework grounded in value-consistent learning. We first design a value consistency metric based on the cosine similarity between the reward-gap vector of each preference pair and an all-ones vector, which quantifies its cross-value coherence. We then filter out low-consistency preference pairs in each value dataset and train on the remaining data to obtain smooth, value-consistent policy models that better preserve linear mode connectivity. Finally, we linearly combine these policies and apply Pareto filtering across values to obtain solutions with balanced multi-value performance. Extensive experiments and theoretical analysis demonstrate that VC-soup effectively mitigates conflicts and consistently outperforms existing multi-value alignment methods.
Figures & tables
| Method | helpful | harmless | honest | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | -0.269 | -0.518 | -3.242 | -1.343 |
| DPO-Help | 2.371 | -2.555 | -6.533 | -2.238 |
| DPO-Harm | -1.619 | 1.115 | -14.386 | -4.963 |
| DPO-Honest | 1.457 | -0.851 | 3.797 | 1.465 |
| SeqT | 0.334 | -0.139 | -13.867 | -4.557 |
| SOUP | 1.277 | -1.381 | 0.678 | 0.191 |
| Method | Filtering | Merging | Helpful | Harmless |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | -0.269 | -0.518 | ||
| DPO-Help | 2.371 | -2.555 | ||
| DPO-Harm | -1.619 | 1.115 | ||
| Only merge | 1.624 | -0.01 | ||
| DPO- | 2.095 | 0.116 | ||
| DPO- | 1.248 | 0.71 |
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
LLM Alignment
Large language model alignment studies methods for making models follow human intentions, values, and safety constraints across contexts.
See all 598 papers