AGRI-Fidelity: Evaluating the Reliability of Listenable Explanations for Poultry Disease Detection

SHAP and LIME are now standard tools for interpreting black-box predictions, yet their outputs can vary substantially when the input is perturbed by small amounts of noise--a problem we observed firsthand in our previous work on food security in Madagascar (Ralinirina et al., 2025). This variability raises the question of whether such explanations can be trusted at all. We address it by constructing an auditing protocol that measures two properties of any post-hoc explainer: robustness (how stable the explanation is under input perturbation) and fidelity (whether the features deemed important actually drive the model's prediction). These two quantities are combined into a single Trust Score. We run the protocol on a multi-sectoral dataset from Madagascar (83 features, 253 records, 4 malnutrition classes) using three classifiers and two explainers, plus their regularized counterparts. The results are sobering: models with AUC above 0.99 can produce numerically degenerate or flatly uninformative explanations, and fidelity scores lose discriminative power when the model is overfitted. These findings suggest that auditing XAI outputs is not optional but necessary, particularly when they inform decisions in sensitive domains.

Early detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) and endemic poultry diseases is critical for global food security. While computer vision models excel at classifying diseases from fecal imaging, deploying these systems at scale is bottlenecked by farm data privacy concerns and institutional data silos. Furthermore, existing open-source agricultural datasets frequently suffer from severe, undocumented data contamination. In this paper, we introduce $\textbf{FecalFed}$, a privacy-preserving federated learning framework for poultry disease classification. We first curate and release $\texttt{poultry-fecal-fl}$, a rigorously deduplicated dataset of 8,770 unique images across four disease classes, revealing and eliminating a 46.89$\%$ duplication rate in popular public repositories. To simulate realistic agricultural environments, we evaluate FecalFed under highly heterogeneous, non-IID conditions (Dirichlet $α=0.5$). While isolated single-farm training collapses under this data heterogeneity, yielding only 64.86$\%$ accuracy, our federated approach recovers performance without centralizing sensitive data. Specifically, utilizing server-side adaptive optimization (FedAdam) with a Swin-Small architecture achieves 90.31$\%$ accuracy, closely approaching the centralized upper bound of 95.10%. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an edge-optimized Swin-Tiny model maintains highly competitive performance at 89.74$\%$, establishing a highly efficient, privacy-first blueprint for on-farm avian disease monitoring.

Explainable AI (XAI) helps users interpret model behavior and identify potential faults. Agentic XAI systems use Large Language Models (LLMs) to make explanations more accessible through natural-language interaction, but they can also produce plausible yet unfaithful explanations. This risk arises because unreliable XAI outputs for complex models can be amplified by LLMs and mislead users. We propose Faithful Agentic XAI (FAX), a framework that improves explanation faithfulness through explicit verification. FAX decomposes draft explanations into claims and cross-checks them against inherently faithful tools, filtering unsupported or contradictory claims before final generation. We also introduce CRAFTER-XAI-Bench, an open-world reinforcement learning benchmark with complex policies, diverse goals, and challenging scenarios for assessing model-specific faithfulness. On CRAFTER-XAI-Bench, FAX improves simulation faithfulness from 0.20 for the strongest baseline to 0.46 while maintaining high informativeness, relevance, and fluency. On three tabular benchmarks, FAX performs competitively with prior Agentic XAI baselines, but our analysis shows that these settings can conflate task accuracy with model-specific faithfulness. These findings show that explicit verification is essential for faithful Agentic XAI and that that faithfulness benchmarks must be designed to test explanations against the behavior of the target model itself.