Organizations: School of Software Engineering, Yunnan University, KunMing, 650500, Yunnan, China. · The School of Artificial Intelligence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518172, Guangdong, China. · Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Software Engineering, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, Yunnan, China.
Recently Mamba-based methods have shown promise in abdominal organ segmentation. However, existing approaches neglect cross-channel anatomical semantic collaboration and lack explicit boundary-aware feature fusion mechanisms. To address these limitations, we propose CS-MUNet with two purpose-built modules. The Boundary-Aware State Mamba module employs a Bayesian-attention framework to generate pixel-level boundary posterior maps, injected directly into Mamba's core scan parameters to embed boundary awareness into the SSM state transition mechanism, while dual-branch weight allocation enables complementary modulation between global and local structural representations. The Channel Mamba State Aggregation module redefines the channel dimension as the SSM sequence dimension to explicitly model cross-channel anatomical semantic collaboration in a data-driven manner. Experiments on two public benchmarks demonstrate that CS-MUNet consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple metrics, establishing a new SSM modeling paradigm that jointly addresses channel semantic collaboration and boundary-aware feature fusion for abdominal multi-organ segmentation.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overall architecture of CS-MUNet and its two proposed modules.(a) U-shaped encoder-decoder with CMSA at the bottleneck and BASM at each skip connection fusing Fe and decoder feature Fd .(b)CMSA processes grouped channel sequences via a shared SSM, where Aˉk , γk denote the state transition matrix and cumulative decay under Lipschitz constraints, and μk , hk+1 , and yk the input, hidden state, and output of the k-th channel.(c) BASM injects boundary posterior Pb derived from guidance map M and distance field d~ into VMamba’s Δ and B parameters to yield Fssm , fused with Fsafs to produce Fout .
Dataset
Method
mDice
mIoU
Params (M)
UW-Madison GI Tract
U-Net Ronneberger et al. (2015)
0.8312
0.7562
32.66
Att-UNet Oktay et al. (2018)
0.8314
0.7564
67.85
TransUNet Chen et al. (2024)
0.8163
0.7394
117.19
Swin-UNet Cao et al. (2023)
0.8292
0.7531
41.48
UNet++ Zhou et al. (2018)
0.8311
0.7487
92.63
MSDUNet (2025) Li et al. (2025)
0.8325
0.7575
116.82
Table 1: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on the UW-Madison GI Tract and WORD datasets. The best result in each group is shown in bold .
Dataset
Organ
Dice
IoU
HD95 (mm)
ASD (mm)
UW-Madison GI Tract
Stomach
0.8862
0.8421
6.83
2.35
Small Bowel
0.8252
0.7400
15.41
3.87
Large Bowel
0.8735
0.7927
15.19
4.03
WORD
Liver
0.9660
0.9512
5.34
1.40
Right Kidney
0.9751
0.9639
2.38
0.85
Spleen
0.9807
0.9699
1.73
0.64
Table 2: Per-organ segmentation results of CS-MUNet on the UW-Madison GI Tract and WORD datasets. HD95 is reported in mm; ASD is reported in mm.
Dataset
Configuration
mDice
mIoU
UW-Madison GI Tract
Baseline
0.8312
0.7562
Baseline + BASM
0.8432
0.7719
Baseline + CMSA
0.8484
0.7755
w/o Δ /B modulation
0.8537
0.7819
w/o SE-style weight allocation
0.8484
0.7749
CS-MUNet (Ours)
0.8616
0.7916
Table 3: Ablation study of CS-MUNet on the UW-Madison GI Tract and WORD datasets. The best result in each group is shown in bold .
Experiment
Value
mDice (%)
mIoU (%)
Optimal
Vary μR (fixed μE=1.2 )
0.5
85.64
78.58
×
0.8
86.16
79.16
✓
1.2
85.52
78.39
×
Vary μE (fixed μR=0.8 )
0.6
85.55
78.47
×
1.2
86.16
79.16
✓
1.5
85.69
78.60
×
Table 4: Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis on the UW-Madison GI Tract dataset. All metrics are reported as percentages (%). Bold indicates the optimal value in each group.
Figure 2: Comparison of parameter count (M) and computational cost (FLOPs, G) across all comparison models and ablation variants, with Ours highlighted in red.
Figure 3: Qualitative segmentation comparisons across five representative WORD CT samples (coronal, sagittal, and axial views).
Figure 4: Per-slice segmentation comparisons on five representative UW-Madison MRI cases across three organ categories: stomach (red), small bowel (green), and large bowel (blue).
Medical image segmentation delineates organs, lesions, and other structures in scans to support measurement, diagnosis, treatment planning, and research.
Glasgow Caledonian University School of Science & Engineering Glasgow G4 0BA, United Kingdom · Jade University of Applied Sciences Department of Engineering & Medical Technology Germany, 26389, Wilhelmshaven, Germany