Auction-Based Task Allocation with Energy-Conscientious Trajectory Optimization for AMR Fleets

Most multi-robot task allocation methods rely on communication to resolve conflicts and reach consistent assignments. In environments with limited bandwidth, degraded infrastructure, or adversarial interference, existing approaches degrade sharply. We introduce a learning-based framework that achieves high-quality task allocation without any robot-to-robot communication. The key idea is that robots coordinate implicitly by predicting teammates' bids: if each robot can anticipate competition for a task, it can adjust its choices accordingly. Our method predicts bid distributions to correct systematic errors in analytical mean-field approximations. While analytical predictions assume idealized conditions (uniform distributions, known bid functions), our learned approach adapts to task clustering and spatial heterogeneity. Inspired by Smart Predict-then-Optimize (SPO), we train predictors end-to-end to minimize Task Allocation Regret rather than prediction error. To scale to large swarms, we develop a mean-field approximation where each robot predicts the distribution of competing bids rather than individual bids, reducing complexity from $O(NT)$ to $O(T)$. We call our approach FORMICA: Field-Oriented Regret-Minimizing Implicit Coordination Algorithm. Experiments show FORMICA substantially outperforms a natural analytical baseline. In scenarios with 16 robots and 64 tasks, our approach improves system reward by 17% and approaches the optimal MILP solution. When deployed on larger scenarios (256 robots, 4096 tasks), the same model improves performance by 7%, demonstrating strong generalization. Training requires only 21 seconds on a laptop, enabling rapid adaptation to new environments.

This paper presents a scalable framework for multi-robot task allocation in complex environments where estimating task execution costs is computationally expensive. While combinatorial auction-based approaches offer reliable solutions, the exponential complexity of bundle generation typically renders them intractable for real-time reactive applications, particularly when accurate path planning is required for cost validation. We address this through a distributed, two-stage multi-fidelity bundle generation approach. Agents utilize a local search tree guided by a low-fidelity heuristic (such as euclidean distance) to rapidly explore the bundle space, applying high-fidelity path planning only to the most promising candidates in a best-first manner. These refined bids are then submitted to a central coordinator that solves a set packing problem to ensure global feasibility and maximize the overall utility. Simulation results in multiple environments demonstrate that the framework is able to improve the performance of reactive auction-based task allocation. Overall, the presented framework is shown to enable reactive task allocation with dynamic bundle sizes in multiple settings without exposing the agents' state and internal cost estimation models.

Decentralized multi-robot task allocation (MRTA) is essential for scalable and resilient autonomous systems. The Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (CBBA) is a widely adopted decentralized baseline. However, its individual task-level bidding is poorly aligned with the min-sum objective of minimizing total team travel distance, leading to suboptimal allocations in spatially distributed environments. This paper introduces the Grouping Auction-Consensus Algorithm (GACA). This decentralized MRTA framework adopts the two-phase auction-consensus architecture of CBBA while fundamentally redesigning its bidding mechanism to reason over groups of spatially proximate tasks. A nearest-neighbor preprocessing step partitions tasks into spatially coherent groups before allocation. Agents then iteratively propose structured group-level actions: claiming unassigned groups, acquiring partial groups, or contesting groups held by other agents. Competing actions are resolved through a consensus phase. Operating in the MT-SR-IA problem class, GACA is evaluated against CBBA using a Mixed-Integer Linear Program as the ground-truth optimality reference. Across four swarm sizes and 4,000 test worlds, GACA achieves a median percent optimality of approximately 97% compared to 81--84% for CBBA, while converging in equal or fewer iterations. A scalability evaluation over 3,280 additional problem instances spanning swarm sizes of 5 to 20 agents and task counts of 10 to 50 confirms that these gains generalize robustly across a wide range of problem configurations.