In Machine Translation, Large Language Models (LLMs) have generally underperformed compared to conventional encoder-decoder systems and thus see limited adoption. However, LLMs excel at modeling contextual information, making them a natural fit for document-level translation tasks where coherence across sentences is crucial. Despite this potential, document-level MT with LLMs faces two key challenges: (1) the scarcity of large-scale, high-quality document-level parallel data; and (2) the propensity of LLMs to introduce hallucinations and omissions during generation. To address these challenges, we propose a two-stage fine-tuning strategy leveraging LLM-augmented document-level data. First, we augment data by converting summarization data into document-level parallel data using a LLM, and then filter it using multiple metrics, leveraging sacreBLEU, COMET, and LaBSE-based cosine similarity-to improve data quality. Finally, we employ a two-stage fine-tuning strategy: first fine-tuning on the abundant sentence-level MT resources, and then on the filtered document-level corpus.
Figures & tables
Thresholds/ Filtering Methods
No Filtering
sacreBLEU
COMET
LaBSE- CosSim
sacreBLEU & COMET
sacreBLEU & LaBSE-CosSim
COMET & LaBSE-CosSim
All
sacreBLEU 30 COMET 0.7 LaBSE-CosSim 0.8
18,439 (92.2%)
19,925 (99.6%)
19,917 (99.6%)
18,430 (92.2%)
18,420 (92.1%)
19,868 (99.3%)
18,411 (92.1%)
sacreBLEU 35 COMET 0.75 LaBSE-CosSim 0.85
20,000 (100%)
15,139 (75.7%)
19,526 (97.8%)
19,554 (97.8%)
15,016 (75.0%)
14,913 (74.6%)
19,137 (95.7%)
14,791 (74.0%)
sacreBLEU 40 COMET 0.80 LaBSE-CosSim 0.90
8,914 (44.6%)
16,471 (82.4%)
14,220 (71.1%)
8,234 (41.2%)
6,633 (33.2%)
11,447 (57.2%)
6,042 (30.2%)
Table 1: Sizes of filtered datasets based on different thresholds.
Figure 1: Overview of the document-level MT data augmentation and filtering pipeline. We convert a summarization dataset (CNN/Daily Mail) into document-level MT pairs using a large language model ( Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct ), then apply filtering using sacreBLEU, COMET, and LaBSE-CosSim. For reference-based metrics, pseudo references are generated by a conventional MT model (Google Translate) known to produce fewer hallucinations and omissions.
Fine-tuning Strategy
Document-level only
Two-stage fine-tuning
sacreBLEU
11.24
15.07
COMET
0.618
0.697
LaBSE-CosSim
0.764
0.852
Geometric Mean
1.744
2.076
Table 2: Comparison between models trained only on unfiltered augmented data and those trained using the proposed two-stage fine-tuning strategy.
Filtering Methods
No Filtering (Augmented data)
sacreBLEU
COMET
LaBSE-CosSim
Thresholds
-
30
35
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.8
0.85
0.9
sacreBLEU
15.07
15.58
15.85
15.66
13.8
15.53
14.04
15.53
15.74
COMET
0.697
0.698
0.696
0.697
0.700
0.700
0.691
0.694
0.698
LaBSE-CosSim
0.852
0.851
0.855
0.847
0.848
0.854
0.843
0.850
0.856
Geometric Mean
2.076
2.100
2.113
2.099
2.016
2.102
2.013
2.092
2.111
Table 3: Evaluation results of models fine-tuned on data filtered using a single method. Each model is trained using the two-stage fine-tuning strategy with datasets filtered by a single metric.
Filtering Methods
No Filtering (Augmented data)
sacreBLEU & COMET
sacreBLEU & LaBSE-CosSim
COMET & LaBSE-CosSim
Thresholds
-
30 & 0.7
35 & 0.75
30 & 0.8
35 & 0.85
0.7 & 0.8
0.75 & 0.85
0.8 & 0.9
sacreBLEU
15.07
15.82
15.99
15.79
15.89
15.57
15.43
15.65
COMET
0.697
0.700
0.699
0.698
0.701
0.697
0.697
0.700
LaBSE-CosSim
0.852
0.855
0.856
0.857
0.855
0.851
0.858
0.851
Geometric Mean
2.076
2.116
2.123
2.114
2.120
2.098
2.097
2.105
Table 4: Evaluation results of models trained on datasets filtered using two combined metrics. Models are trained with two-stage fine-tuning on datasets filtered by metric combinations.
Filtering Methods
No Filtering (Augmented data)
sacreBLEU & COMET & LaBSE-CosSim
Thresholds
-
30 & 0.7 & 0.8
35 & 0.75 & 0.85
sacreBLEU
15.07
15.90
15.96
COMET
0.697
0.699
0.701
LaBSE-CosSim
0.852
0.856
0.860
Geometric Mean
2.076
2.119
2.127
Table 5: Evaluation results of models trained on datasets filtered using all three metrics.
Machine translation develops computational methods for converting text, speech, and visual content between languages while preserving meaning and purpose.
Institute of Computing and Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen · 2NLP2CT Lab, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Macau · 3Huawei Translation Services Center