How Can Machine Learning Emulators Best Support Climate Science?
Authors: Luca Schmidt, Nina Effenberger, Vitus Benson, Philine L. Bommer, Robert Brunstein, Mikel N. Legasa, Maxim Samarin, Maybritt Schillinger
Abstract
For decades, physics-based climate models have been used to provide insights for climate decision-making. Their application is, however, constrained by significant computational and technical demands. Machine learning (ML) emulators offer a way to reduce these high computational costs; yet, it remains challenging to use ML emulators effectively in climate research. In practice, climate scientists often bypass emulators altogether, and machine learning researchers frequently develop them as methodological showcases without proving their practical utility. The reasons are diverse, ranging from limited accessibility and a lack of specialized knowledge to broader concerns about the physical grounding of ML methods. Here, we discuss limitations and introduce a framework for guiding emulator development, considering both climate science and machine learning perspectives. We argue that designing easy-to-adopt emulators that address clearly defined tasks and demonstrate their reliability is essential. This offers a promising path towards making machine-learning approaches more relevant and usable for applied climate research.
Climate emulation is an out-of-distribution (OOD) projection task. This is precisely the challenge where modern Machine Learning (ML) methods are most prone to failure. Consequently, while current ML emulators trained on present climate achieve high in-distribution performance, their future reliability under the inevitable distribution shifts of a changing climate remains a critical, poorly understood blind spot. Addressing this challenge requires a fundamental shift in how we understand, evaluate, and design climate emulators. In this work, we first confirm that climate change drives a statistically significant and progressively growing shift in atmospheric state distributions, rendering standard evaluation protocols insufficient. We empirically establish that seasonal variation serves as an effective proxy for these long-term climate shifts, providing access to real-world distribution shifts without recourse to heuristics like synthetic perturbations. Motivated by this link, we introduce a novel evaluation framework that leverages seasonal shifts as a rigorous, zero-overhead testbed for emulator robustness. Our systematic characterisation confirms that current state-of-the-art hybrid-ML emulators degrade significantly under these realistic shifts. Finally, we chart a path forward by identifying compositional generalisation, the ability to form novel combinations from observed elementary components, as a principled route towards robust climate emulation. We demonstrate that physically motivated decompositions substantially improve OOD performance with only modest trade-offs against in-distribution performance, providing an avenue towards ML-driven climate emulators robust to an unknown future.
Bradley Stanley-Clamp, Anson Lei, Hannah M. Christensen +1
As deep learning for physical systems continues to grow in popularity, efforts to improve generalizability have primarily focused on designing architectures that embed physical constraints. However, for machine-learning surrogate climate models (emulators), we show that the low structural diversity in existing scenarios commonly used to generate training data places a ceiling on predictive skill. Here, we examine whether training datasets themselves can be optimized to improve generalization. We introduce a method to create datasets that produce emulators capable of generalizing to new, structurally different scenarios absent from the training data. We use a differentiable Simple Climate Model (SCM) to calculate the sensitivity of emulator loss to perturbations in the training data, iteratively updating the training data to maximize emulator skill. For an SCM, training on one scenario optimized in this fashion outperforms an emulator trained on six standard ScenarioMIP pathways. We achieve this higher predictive skill despite training on a smaller dataset, finding that our emulator successfully isolates distinct physical behaviors of different climate forcing agents (e.g., greenhouse gases vs. aerosols) without single-forcing runs. We then demonstrate that scenarios optimized using an SCM, when used to drive an intermediate-complexity climate model, produce a training dataset that yields a more skillful emulator than training on ScenarioMIP outputs. Our results suggest that, in the compute-constrained environment of running full-scale climate models, generating a small number of dynamically rich scenarios provides greater marginal value for emulation and characterizing system responses than expanding the suite of traditional emissions pathways.
Christopher B. Womack, Shahine Bouabid, Andrei Sokolov +4
Toward the goal of using Scientific Machine Learning (SciML) emulators to improve the numerical representation of aerosol processes in global atmospheric models, we explore the emulation of aerosol microphysics processes under cloud-free conditions in the 4-mode Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2 (E3SMv2). To develop an in-depth understanding of the challenges and opportunities in applying SciML to aerosol processes, we begin with a simple feedforward neural network architecture that has been used in earlier studies, but we systematically examine key emulator design choices, including architecture complexity and variable normalization, while closely monitoring training convergence behavior. Our results show that optimization convergence, scaling strategy, and network complexity strongly influence emulation accuracy. When effective scaling is applied and convergence is achieved, the relatively simple architecture, used together with a moderate network size, can reproduce key features of the microphysics-induced aerosol concentration changes with promising accuracy. These findings provide practical clues for the next stages of emulator development; they also provide general insights that are likely applicable to the emulation of other aerosol processes, as well as other atmospheric physics involving multi-scale variability.