Organizations: Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. · Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. · Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. · Department of Artificial Intelligence, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Class-incremental learning (CIL) in medical image-guided diagnosis requires retaining prior diagnostic knowledge while adapting to newly emerging disease categories, which is critical for scalable clinical deployment. This problem is particularly challenging due to heterogeneous data and privacy constraints that prevent memory replay. Although pretrained foundation models (PFMs) have advanced general-domain CIL, their potential in medical imaging remains underexplored, where domain-specific adaptation is essential yet difficult due to anatomical complexity and inter-institutional heterogeneity. To address this gap, we conduct a systematic benchmark of recent PFM-based CIL methods and propose Bidirectional Conservative-Radical Complementary Learning (Bi-CRCL), a dual-learner framework inspired by complementary learning systems. Bi-CRCL integrates a conservative learner that preserves prior knowledge through stability-oriented updates and a radical learner that rapidly adapts to new categories via plasticity-oriented learning. A bidirectional interaction mechanism enables forward transfer and backward consolidation, allowing continual integration of new knowledge while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. During inference, outputs from both learners are adaptively fused for robust predictions. Experiments on five medical imaging datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods under diverse settings, including cross-dataset shifts and varying task configurations.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Illustration of conventional vs. PFM-based medical CIL. Conventional CIL trains models from scratch, similar to teaching an infant to learn from zero experience. PFM-based CIL builds on PFMs, analogous to guiding an experienced adult to adapt efficiently to new tasks. Both paradigms share the fundamental challenge of catastrophic forgetting when learning new classes sequentially.
Fig. 2: Overview of our Bi-CRCL framework. (a) Initialized Domain Alignment: At task t=1 , the general-domain PFM adapts to the medical domain via adapter tuning to enable efficient PFM transfer while preserving generalization; (b) Continual Bidirectional Complementary Learning: For t>1 , a radical learner incrementally learns new classes and exchanges knowledge with the conservative learner through bidirectional consolidation and re-initialization, emulating hippocampus–neocortex coordination; (c) Collaborative Inference: During inference, outputs from both learners are projected via analytical classifiers and adaptively fused to produce robust task-agnostic predictions.
Dataset
Classes
Training set
Test set
Task Num.
Size
Colon [ 15 ]
9
70,000
30,000
4
224×224
Blood [ 2 ]
8
11,965
5,127
4
360×363
Skin8 [ 29 ]
8
3,555
705
4
[600,1024]
MedMNIST-Sub [ 41 ]
36
302,002
75,659
4
28×28
COVID (CT&X-ray) [ 30 ]
11
3,939
1,072
6
224×224
TABLE I: Overview of medical image classification datasets.
Fig. 3: An illustration of the diverse medical imaging tasks addressed by our model, spanning lesion classification (dermoscopic images), organ classification (CT scans), blood cell classification (microscopy), tissue classification (histopathology), and disease detection (CT & X-ray scans), with representative example classes from each dataset.
Method
Colon
Blood
Skin8
MedMNIST-Sub
COVID (CT&X-ray)
AccAvg
AccLast
AccAvg
AccLast
AccAvg
AccLast
AccAvg
AccLast
AccAvg
AccLast
Joint Training
-
99.98
-
99.61
-
67.73
-
73.61
-
92.43
Finetune
38.65
10.43
37.47
14.54
39.62
17.87
29.18
5.66
26.55
10.54
FOSTER † [ 31 ]
90.81
86.69
87.70
90.24
55.00
39.01
58.24
31.46
71.65
55.50
iCaRL † [ 24 ]
80.50
78.13
81.41
81.57
58.45
39.57
68.23
38.44
70.10
65.21
DER † [ 40 ]
85.92
85.63
86.48
87.10
48.57
23.55
69.97
42.11
31.40
27.05
TABLE II: Performance on five medical datasets. “ † ” indicates the necessity of replaying prior data. The best and second-best results are bolded and underlined , respectively.
Fig. 4: The performance curves across learning sessions on five medical datasets. Bi-CRCL consistently achieves the best overall performance and exhibits minimal degradation as class number increases.
PFM
Method
Colon
Blood
Skin8
MedMNIST-Sub
COVID (CT&X-rays)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
RAD-DINO [ 21 ]
Joint Training
-
86.34
-
65.83
-
42.20
-
56.27
-
70.80
Finetuning
38.06
11.57
44.84
36.57
31.76
15.32
48.80
33.53
24.39
6.25
SimpleCIL [ 48 ]
53.44
46.67
43.14
25.29
34.82
21.56
48.62
38.01
57.09
46.60
ADAM-Adapter [ 48 ]
54.92
48.58
42.50
24.55
35.40
21.99
49.91
38.06
55.51
39.46
MOS [ 27 ]
24.52
8.77
31.68
9.08
24.09
5.53
22.95
8.23
21.28
11.01
TABLE III: Performance comparison using different PFMs (medical-specific vs. general-domain) across five benchmark datasets. The best results of each PFM are bolded .
Dataset
Setting
Exclusion
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
Skin8
Bi-CRCL
None
74.59
61.99
Abla-1
Initialized Adaptation
70.96
59.69
Abla-2
Bidirectional Knowledge Interaction
74.83
61.42
Abla-3
Conservative Learner Inference
73.82
60.43
Abla-4
Radical Learner Inference
74.49
61.84
COVID
Bi-CRCL
None
96.12
88.15
TABLE IV: Ablation analysis on three representative and challenging datasets (Skin8, COVID and MedMNIST-Sub). The best and second-best results are bolded and underlined , respectively.
Method
Order
Colon
Blood
Skin8
MedMNIST-Sub
COVID (CT&X-rays)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
Finetuning
-
38.65
10.43
37.47
14.54
39.62
17.87
29.18
5.66
26.55
10.54
Finetuning
reversed
47.80
26.52
49.67
22.97
25.32
14.75
31.13
18.45
34.47
11.19
SimpleCIL [ 48 ]
-
90.10
85.41
83.85
79.79
56.61
38.30
68.07
50.63
75.84
57.37
SimpleCIL [ 48 ]
reversed
90.17
85.91
89.54
79.85
53.79
38.30
49.58
50.44
77.88
66.79
SSIAT [ 28 ]
-
75.36
66.34
86.00
84.63
60.46
41.99
59.43
25.79
72.00
60.17
TABLE V: Performance comparison across five benchmark datasets using a reversed task order. The best and second-best results are bolded and underlined , respectively.
Method
Task Number
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
SimpleCIL [ 48 ]
4
68.07
50.63
SimpleCIL [ 48 ]
8
51.41
50.44
MOS [ 27 ]
4
74.59
51.80
MOS [ 27 ]
8
80.96
61.83
Bi-CRCL (ours)
4
84.22
69.71
Bi-CRCL (ours)
8
86.48
70.28
TABLE VI: Effect of task-split granularity on Bi-CRCL performance (MedMNIST-Sub dataset).
Dataset
Replay
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
Colon
✓
99.06
98.43
×
99.12
98.51
Blood
✓
98.06
97.53
×
98.08
97.56
Skin8
✓
74.56
61.99
×
74.59
61.99
TABLE VII: Empirical analysis of memory replay in Bi-CRCL.
Method
AccAvg (%)
AccLast (%)
Joint Training
-
71.65
SimpleCIL [ 48 ]
57.50
55.41
ADAM-Adapter [ 48 ]
63.18
55.52
SLCA [ 44 ]
38.34
33.72
SSIAT [ 28 ]
53.97
28.41
MOS [ 27 ]
70.66
62.05
TABLE VIII: Performance comparison on inter-dataset continual learning. The best results are bolded .
Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims to continually learn new categories without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. Vision-language models such as CLIP offer strong transferable representations via multi-modal supervision, making them promising for CIL. However, applying CLIP to CIL poses two major challenges: (1) adapting to downstream tasks often requires additional learnable modules, increasing model complexity and susceptibility to forgetting; and (2) while multi-modal representations offer complementary strengths, existing methods have yet to fully realize their potential in effectively integrating visual and textual modalities. To address these issues, we propose BOFA (Bridge-layer Orthogonal Fusion for Adaptation), a novel framework for CIL. BOFA confines all model adaptation exclusively to CLIP's existing cross-modal bridge-layer, thereby adding no extra parameters or inference cost. To prevent forgetting within this layer, it leverages Orthogonal Low-Rank Fusion, a mechanism that constrains parameter updates to a low-rank ``safe subspace" mathematically constructed to be orthogonal to past task features. This ensures stable knowledge accumulation without data replay. Furthermore, BOFA employs a cross-modal hybrid prototype that synergizes stable textual prototypes with visual counterparts derived from our stably adapted bridge-layer, enhancing classification performance. Extensive experiments on standard benchmarks show that BOFA achieves superior accuracy and efficiency compared to existing methods.
Lan Li, Tao Hu, Da-Wei Zhou +3
School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, China · National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China
Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) requires models to learn new classes without forgetting old ones. A common method is to freeze a pre-trained model and train a new, lightweight adapter for each task. While this prevents forgetting, it treats the learned knowledge as a simple, unstructured collection and fails to use the relationships between tasks. To this end, we propose the Semantic-guided Adaptive Expert Forest (SAEF), a new method that organizes adapters into a structured hierarchy for better knowledge sharing. SAEF first groups tasks into conceptual clusters based on their semantic relationships. Then, within each cluster, it builds a balanced expert tree by creating new adapters from merging the adapters of similar tasks. At inference time, SAEF finds and activates a set of relevant experts from the forest for any given input. The final prediction is made by combining the outputs of these activated experts, weighted by how confident each expert is. Experiments on several benchmark datasets show that SAEF achieves SOTA performance.
Ruiqi Liu, Boyu Diao, Hangda Liu +3
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Medical image segmentation faces a fundamental challenge in continual learning: data arrives sequentially from heterogeneous sources, yet effective continual learning requires discovering which tasks share sufficient structure to benefit from joint learning. Existing methods either apply uniform constraints across all tasks, causing catastrophic forgetting when tasks conflict, or require predefined task groupings that cannot anticipate future task diversity. We introduce MedCRP-CL, a framework that performs online task structure discovery and structure-aware continual learning. Leveraging the Chinese Restaurant Process (CRP), our method dynamically infers task groupings from clinical text prompts as tasks arrive, without requiring predefined cluster counts or access to future tasks. We term these discovered groupings semantic modalities, as they capture finer-grained structure than physical imaging modalities by integrating anatomical region and pathological context. Guided by this discovered structure, we maintain semantic modality-specific LoRA adapters regularized by intra-modality EWC, ensuring parameter isolation across dissimilar task groups while facilitating knowledge transfer within similar ones. The framework is also replay-free, storing only aggregate statistics rather than raw patient data. Experiments on 16 medical segmentation tasks across four imaging modalities demonstrate that MedCRP-CL achieves 73.3% Dice score with only 4.1% forgetting, outperforming the best baseline by 8.0% while requiring 6× fewer parameters. Code is available at https://github.com/zygao930/MedCRP-CL.