Agentic Trust Coordination for Federated Learning through Adaptive Thresholding and Autonomous Decision Making in Sustainable and Resilient Industrial Networks
Organizations: London South Bank University, London, UK. · Instituto de Telecomunica¸c˜oes, Aveiro, Portugal.
Abstract
Distributed intelligence in industrial networks increasingly integrates sensing, communication, and computation across heterogeneous and resource constrained devices. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training in such environments, but its reliability is affected by inconsistent client behaviour, noisy sensing conditions, and the presence of faulty or adversarial updates. Trust based mechanisms are commonly used to mitigate these effects, yet most remain statistical and heuristic, relying on fixed parameters or simple adaptive rules that struggle to accommodate changing operating conditions. This paper presents a lightweight agentic trust coordination approach for FL in sustainable and resilient industrial networks. The proposed Agentic Trust Control Layer operates as a server side control loop that observes trust related and system level signals, interprets their evolution over time, and applies targeted trust adjustments when instability is detected. The approach extends prior adaptive trust mechanisms by enabling context aware intervention decisions, rather than relying on fixed or purely reactive parameter updates. By explicitly separating observation, reasoning, and action, the proposed framework supports stable FL operation without modifying client side training or increasing communication overhead.
Figures & tables
| Dimension | Adaptive ATSSSF | Agentic Trust Control Loop (ATCL) |
|---|---|---|
| Trust management paradigm | Adaptive statistical trust filtering with parameter tuning | Agent-supervised closed loop trust coordination |
| Adaptation logic | Predefined rules governing threshold and EMA updates | State conditioned decision making based on inferred system behaviour |
| Control structure | Direct metric to parameter reaction | Explicit observation–analysis–decision–action cycle |
| Use of temporal context | Implicit via EMA smoothing | Explicit multi-round trend interpretation and state inference |
| Signal integration | Primarily independent trust indicators | Joint reasoning over multiple trust and system-level signals |
| Decision trigger | Local threshold violations or statistical deviation | Inferred system state (normal, degraded, stabilising) |