Conditional Neural Bayes Ratio Estimation for Experimental Design Optimisation

Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) fits an amortized conditional density estimator to a simulated training set of complete-data realizations. NPE's training objective, log-likelihood, favors posterior approximations that assign arbitrarily high density to the training points, and typical families of amortized conditional density estimators (e.g., normalizing flows, Gaussian encoders) are flexible enough to oblige. The resulting policy of extreme overconfidence translates poorly to held-out data. Early stopping and other regularizers can prevent this degeneracy, but they are limited to selecting posterior approximations along an unfavorable optimization trajectory set by in-sample residuals, where the posterior mean is underfit while the posterior variance is overfit. To avoid this trade-off, we propose Cross-Fitting NPE (CF-NPE), which uses sample splitting to separate conditional-mean estimation from the estimation of the posterior's higher moments. Using $K$-fold cross-fitting, CF-NPE fits $K$ posterior-mean regressors and then fits a conditional density estimator to the resulting out-of-fold residuals. In experiments with synthetic data and in a cosmological application, CF-NPE achieves higher held-out log-likelihood than standard NPE and typically improves calibration. CF-NPE is most useful in high-dimensional, simulation-limited settings.

Computational cognitive modeling seeks to infer latent cognitive mechanisms underlying observed behavior. Bayesian inverse planning provides a principled framework for such inference, but its success depends critically on the experimental environment. Existing approaches typically treat environments as fixed, leaving open the question of which cognitive experiments are most informative for cognition parameter inference. We formulate the design of cognitive planning experiments as a Bayesian Experimental Design (BED) problem, treating the experimental environment as the design variable. We establish an exact Monte Carlo BED benchmark and introduce an amortized Bayesian experimental design framework for efficient posterior inference and design evaluation. Experiments on the Mouselab-MDP process-tracing paradigm show that amortized BED closely matches the environment rankings of exact Monte Carlo BED while substantially reducing computational cost. We further show that no single environment is uniformly optimal across cognitive inference objectives, revealing trade-offs between expected information gain, posterior recoverability, and information efficiency. These results provide a principled framework for designing informative cognitive experiments for Bayesian parameter inference.

We develop two hybrid techniques that approach the performance of neural simulation-based inference (NSBI) analyses while substantially reducing the computational cost of inference and preserving some or all of the reliability guarantees of parametric methods. The first approach is broadly applicable, while the second is tailored to a class of particle physics analyses that admit a semi-parametric NSBI formulation. With only a modest compromise in raw sensitivity, these methods represent an important step toward computationally efficient NSBI in offline analyses and also open the door to the exploration of trigger-level applications in the future. Based on our comparison studies, we recommend the use of our first approach, Latent Categories, for robust and efficient inference.