As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into lifelong AI assistants, LLM personalization has become a critical frontier. However, progress is currently bottlenecked by the absence of a gold-standard evaluation benchmark. Existing benchmarks either overlook personalized information management that is critical for personalization or rely heavily on synthetic dialogues, which exhibit an inherent distribution gap from real-world dialogue. To bridge this gap, we introduce AlpsBench, An LLM PerSonalization benchmark derived from real-world human-LLM dialogues. AlpsBench comprises 2,500 long-term interaction sequences curated from WildChat, paired with human-verified structured memories that encapsulate both explicit and implicit personalization signals. We define four pivotal tasks - personalized information extraction, updating, retrieval, and utilization - and establish protocols to evaluate the entire lifecycle of memory management. Our benchmarking of frontier LLMs and memory-centric systems reveals that: (i) models struggle to reliably extract latent user traits; (ii) memory updating faces a performance ceiling even in the strongest models; (iii) retrieval accuracy declines sharply in the presence of large distractor pools; and (iv) while explicit memory mechanisms improve recall, they do not inherently guarantee more preference-aligned or emotionally resonant responses. AlpsBench aims to provide a comprehensive framework.
Figures & tables
Benchmark
Real
T1
T2
T3
T4: Utilization Dimensions
Ext.
Upd.
Retr.
PA
PF
VRA
CF
EI
LaMP
●
○
○
○
◐
◐
○
○
○
PersonalLLM
○
○
○
○
◐
●
○
○
○
EQ-Bench
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
●
PersoBench
○
○
○
○
●
●
○
●
○
PersonaFeedback
○
○
○
○
●
●
○
●
○
Table 1. Comparison between AlpsBench and existing LLM personalization benchmarks. “Real” denotes whether the benchmark is built upon real-world data. Columns “T1” to “T4” represent whether the benchmarks contain corresponding testing dimensions.
Figure 1. Comparison between synthesized and real data. Examples contrasting synthesized and real dialogue data, emphasizing that real data contains more diverse and implicit personalization signals.
Figure 2. Examples of the synthesized and the real-world human expressions. Side-by-side examples showing that synthesized expressions tend to be explicit, while real-world human expressions are more indirect and context-dependent.
Figure 3. The evaluation tasks of AlpsBench.
Figure 4. The four-step benchmark construction pipeline based on real human–LLM dialogues.
Figure 5. Alignment between the LLM-based judge and human experts across four tasks. Comparison of full, partial, and non-alignment rates between the LLM-based judge and human experts for the four AlpsBench tasks.
Model
Task 1 Extraction
Task 2 Update
Task 3 Retrieval
Task 4 Utilization
Number of Distractor Memories
PA
PF
VRA
CF
EI
100
300
500
700
1000
Gen.
Int.
EN
CN
GPT-5.2
0.6720
0.7793
0.9519
0.9400
0.9249
0.9138
0.8945
0.5684
0.7043
0.7680
0.6640
0.9083
3.42
3.90
GPT-4.1-mini
0.5373
0.6214
0.9110
0.8578
0.8134
0.8010
0.7700
0.4112
0.5012
0.5240
0.2600
0.7896
2.79
2.92
DeepSeek-v3.2
0.6742
0.7543
0.9728
0.9687
0.9606
0.9333
0.9495
0.5912
0.6499
0.6120
0.3540
0.9419
3.66
4.00
Gemini-3 Flash
0.6487
0.7686
0.9642
0.9585
0.9484
0.9427
0.9440
0.6889
0.7524
0.7052
0.3000
0.8328
3.49
3.58
Table 2. Tasks 1–4. Experimental evaluation results of general-purpose LLMs.
Figure 6. Task 1. Direct and indirect memory extraction recall across evaluated models. Bar chart showing that direct-memory recall is generally higher than indirect-memory recall across the evaluated models.
GPT-4.1 -mini
Ever- MemOS
A-Mem
MemOS no-dial
Mem0
Mem0g
MemOS
LightMem
Precision
0.3044
0.0500
0.1370
0.2850
0.4460
0.4010
0.3260
0.1200
Recall
0.3581
0.9340
0.8830
0.8500
0.6920
0.7230
0.8240
0.8120
F1
0.2970
0.0900
0.2250
0.3890
0.4570
0.4460
0.4330
0.1850
Table 3. Task 1. Extracted information matching results of memory-oriented systems.
Figure 7. Task 3. Heatmap of retrieval scores across evaluated models as the number of distractor memories increases.
Method
PA
PF
VRA
CF
EI
Gen.
Int.
EN
CN
GPT-4.1-mini
0.4112
0.5012
0.5240
0.2600
0.7896
2.79
2.87
Grd. Mem.
-
-
-
-
-
3.21
3.33
MemoryOS
0.3895
0.5195
0.5458
0.1460
0.7872
2.23
2.26
A-Mem
0.2895
0.5422
0.4303
0.2240
0.8497
1.98
1.95
EverMemOS
0.7246
0.7888
0.6494
0.1667
0.7265
2.68
2.73
Table 4. Task 4. Utilization performance comparison of memory-oriented systems.
Empowering large language models with long-term memory is crucial for building agents that adapt to users' evolving needs. Existing evaluations of this capability typically interleave preference-related dialogues with irrelevant conversations, reducing the task to needle-in-a-haystack retrieval while ignoring relationships between events driving user preference evolution. Such settings overlook a fundamental characteristic of real-world personalization: preferences emerge gradually and accumulate across interactions within noisy contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce PERMA, a benchmark designed to evaluate persona consistency over time beyond static preference recall. Additionally, we incorporate (1) text variability and (2) linguistic alignment to simulate erratic user inputs and individual idiolects in real-world data. PERMA consists of temporally ordered interaction events spanning multiple sessions and domains, with preference-related queries inserted over time. We design both multiple-choice and interactive tasks to probe the model's understanding of persona along the interaction timeline. Experiments demonstrate that by linking related interactions, advanced memory systems extract precise preferences and reduce token consumption, outperforming traditional semantic retrieval of raw dialogues. Nevertheless, they still struggle to maintain a coherent persona across temporal depth and cross-domain interference, highlighting the need for more robust personalized memory management in agents. Our code and data are open-sourced at https://github.com/PolarisLiu1/PERMA.
Shuochen Liu, Junyi Zhu, Long Shu +11
University of Science and Technology of China · ESAT-PSI, KU Leuven · City University of Hong Kong +2
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have expanded context windows to million-token scales, yet benchmarks for evaluating memory remain limited to short-session synthetic dialogues. We introduce MemoryCD, the first large-scale, user-centric, cross-domain memory benchmark derived from lifelong real-world behaviors in the Amazon Review dataset. Unlike existing memory datasets that rely on scripted personas to generate synthetic user data, MemoryCD tracks authentic user interactions across years and multiple domains. We construct a multi-faceted long-context memory evaluation pipeline of 14 state-of-the-art LLM base models with 6 memory method baselines on 4 distinct personalization tasks over 12 diverse domains to evaluate an agent's ability to simulate real user behaviors in both single and cross-domain settings. Our analysis reveals that existing memory methods are far from user satisfaction in various domains, offering the first testbed for cross-domain life-long personalization evaluation.
Weizhi Zhang, Xiaokai Wei, Wei-Chieh Huang +4
Roblox · University of Illinois Chicago · University of Cambridge
Existing personalized LLM benchmarks primarily rely on textual personas or isolated behavioral signals, providing limited evaluation of cross-domain behavioral personalization, where responses must be grounded in heterogeneous daily-life activities. To address this gap, we introduce LUNAR, the first benchmark for evaluating how LLMs personalize responses from longitudinal app interaction histories across universal daily-life domains, including clothing, food, housing, and mobility. To support scalable benchmark construction while mitigating data sparsity and privacy concerns, LUNAR uses a multi-stage coarse-to-fine synthesis pipeline grounded in real-world behavioral patterns. Fidelity analyses show closer alignment with real behavioral distributions than other synthetic benchmarks. Experiments on 19 mainstream LLMs show that access to behavioral logs is necessary but not sufficient for deep personalization: neither more context nor larger models guarantees better performance; effective personalization depends on selecting and integrating relevant evidence across domains. Direct retrieval of fine-grained behavioral records consistently outperforms compressed memory, while stronger personalization can come at the cost of privacy protection. These findings identify evidence selection, cross-domain integration, and privacy control as key challenges for personalized LLMs.
Jiahao Zhang, Yongzhi Tong, Zelin Fu +4
1Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology · ♣Work done at Ant Group · 2Ant Group +1