Decoupling Geometric Planning and Execution in Scalable Multi-Agent Path Finding

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) studies how to coordinate multiple agents to reach their goals without collisions and underpins a range of large-scale robotic systems, including automated warehousing and manufacturing. Recent advances enable MAPF solvers to compute high-quality plans for hundreds of agents. However, these plans are generated using simplified robot models with discretized time and action spaces. When they are deployed in physical systems, heterogeneous robot dynamics, asynchronous interactions, communication delays, and other real-world factors can lead to substantial deviations from planned performance. We bridge the gap between discrete planning and real-world execution through ExecTimeNet, a learned world model of MAPF execution that predicts how a discrete MAPF solution will unfold on physical robots, mapping each discrete action to its realized execution state, including its wall-clock completion time and the kinodynamic state in which it ends. Building on this capability, we first propose REMAP, an execution-aware MAPF framework that integrates execution-time estimation into planning, guiding the search toward MAPF solutions with improved execution performance. We also introduce ESADG, a post-planning optimization procedure that optimizes the execution schedule of a given MAPF solution while preserving path feasibility. We evaluate proposed frameworks in high-fidelity simulation with up to 300 agents and on physical robots. In simulation, ExecTimeNet predicts the execution state accurately and transfers to unseen maps and agent counts. Across simulation benchmarks spanning diverse map topologies, REMAP reduces delays by up to 21% over baselines, while ESADG achieves up to 40% normalized improvement. On physical hardware, the full pipeline reduces total execution time by up to 15.3%, demonstrating effective transfer from simulation to real-world deployment.

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is the problem of planning conflict-free paths for multiple agents in a shared space, each from its start to its goal. Classical MAPF has been the dominant formulation for many years, with its assumptions of discrete time and graph-based conflicts presumably easing the search for solutions. These assumptions limit the physical environments and agents for which a solution is truly collision-free, and also place an upper bound on solution quality that no algorithmic improvements can lift. This work investigates how much solution quality, and in what contexts, the classical MAPF formulation forfeits. Continuous-time MAPF (MAPF$_R$) relaxes these assumptions, making it a natural counter-formulation to compare against across various agent counts and sizes, and graph connectedness, topologies, and resolutions. We find that continuous time and agent shape consideration are worth relatively little on their own; their value comes from enabling an expanded range of move actions, on average improving solution quality by at least $5\%$ on narrow and constrained maps and $17\%$ on maps with open spaces. In some cases, the improvements exceed $20\%$. Doubling the map resolution with classical MAPF recovers less than $3\%$, meaning that little of what is forfeited can be bought back through more compute. This work therefore provides insight on when classical MAPF is a reasonable simplification, and when MAPF$_R$ unlocks significantly higher-quality solutions.

Many research fields share a common structure: a set of agents, each pursuing its own goal, whose actions must be coordinated so that no two of them conflict. Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a concrete instance of this structure, with applications from warehouses to road traffic and airports. Much of MAPF research assumes discrete time, circular agents sharing one spatial graph, a single goal per agent, and that an agent must remain at its goal once reached, precluding heterogeneous fleets, non-geometric conflicts, task sequences, and agents that move on after completing them. We generalise the MAPF formulation to lift these assumptions, and present Anytime-Optimal Continuous-time Conflict-Based Search (AOC-CBS), an exact and solution-complete solver for it. AOC-CBS guarantees the eventual return of an optimal solution, while reporting an incumbent with a known optimality gap upper bound throughout its runtime; it is configurable with a portfolio of repair functions, one of which we introduce (Tier-Prioritized Safe Interval Path Planning), and can exploit multiple processor cores. We demonstrate AOC-CBS on a mixed fleet of non-convex agents moving along smooth, kinodynamically feasible trajectories. Preliminary experiments against the exact solver OC-CBS, on well-known benchmarks and roadmaps we sample from them, show AOC-CBS is comparable at finding optimal solutions while extending scalability from the tens to the hundreds of agents when a bounded optimality gap is accepted.