Live Interactive Training for Video Segmentation
Organizations: Cornell University
Abstract
Interactive video segmentation often requires many user interventions for robust performance in challenging scenarios (e.g., occlusions, object separations, camouflage, etc.). Yet, even state-of-the-art models like SAM2 use corrections only for immediate fixes without learning from this feedback, leading to inefficient, repetitive user effort. To address this, we introduce Live Interactive Training (LIT), a novel framework for prompt-based visual systems where models also learn online from human corrections at inference time. Our primary instantiation, LIT-LoRA, implements this by continually updating a lightweight LoRA module on-the-fly. When a user provides a correction, this module is rapidly trained on that feedback, allowing the vision system to improve performance on subsequent frames of the same video. Leveraging the core principles of LIT, our LIT-LoRA implementation achieves an average 18-34% reduction in total corrections on challenging video segmentation benchmarks, with a negligible training overhead of ~0.5s per correction. We further demonstrate its generality by successfully adapting it to other segmentation models and extending it to CLIP-based fine-grained image classification. Our work highlights the promise of live adaptation to transform interactive tools and significantly reduce redundant human effort in complex visual tasks. Project: https://youngxinyu1802.github.io/projects/LIT/.
Figures & tables
| (a) Average user corrections per video | (b) Average annotation time per video (min) | ||||||||||
| Method | VOST | LVOSv2 | MOSEv2 | SA-V Val | SA-V Test | VOST | LVOSv2 | MOSEv2 | SA-V Val | SA-V Test | |
| 0.5 | Original | 27.43 | 33.59 | 31.78 | 20.66 | 20.90 | 18.42 | 14.83 | 22.49 | 12.90 | 13.09 |
| LIT | 18.24 | 25.75 | 25.99 | 16.91 | 16.23 | 12.91 | 11.86 | 18.00 | 10.01 | 10.73 | |
| Reduced | 33.51% | 23.35% | 18.22% | 18.16% | 22.35% | 29.94% | 20.03% | 19.98% | 22.44% | 18.01% | |
| 0.75 | Original | 40.40 | 56.32 | 41.47 | 27.48 | 29.83 | 39.47 | 46.15 | 41.96 | 26.18 | 28.16 |
| LIT | 30.85 | 45.00 | 34.43 | 22.55 | 24.50 | 31.01 | 36.65 | 33.15 | 21.13 | 23.00 | |
| (a) VOS | (b) Fine-grained image classification | ||||
| Dataset | VOST | CUB-200-2011 | Stanford Cars | SUN397 | |
| Model | DAM4SAM | SAMURAI | CLIP | ||
| Original | 34.60 | 26.96 | 13.04 | 13.38 | 13.92 |
| LIT | 22.46 | 21.23 | 8.53 | 7.57 | 8.95 |
| Reduction | 35.09% | 21.25% | 34.55% | 43.40% | 35.70% |
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| # Clicks | # Params | |
| Original | 27.43 | – |
| 18.24 | 35k | |
| 18.84 | 66k ( 2 ) |
| # Clicks | Reduction | Time (s) | |
| Original | 27.43 | – | – |
| 1/1 (ours) | 18.24 | 33.51% | 0.58 |
| 3/3 | 18.74 | 31.69% | 0.61 |
| 5/5 | 19.03 | 30.62% | 0.62 |
| 3/1 | 17.73 | 35.39% | 1.61 |
| 5/1 | 17.64 | 35.71% | 2.32 |
Human-in-the-Loop AI
Human-in-the-loop AI combines human feedback, oversight, and decision-making with machine learning and autonomous systems.
See all 288 papers