Evaluating Large and Lightweight Vision Models for Irregular Component Segmentation in E-Waste Disassembly
Organizations: Florida State University, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Tallahassee, FL, USA · Texas A&M University, Mechanical Engineering, College Station, TX, USA · University of Florida, Environmental Engineering Sciences, Gainesville, FL, USA
Abstract
Precise segmentation of irregular and densely arranged components is essential for robotic disassembly and material recovery in electronic waste (e-waste) recycling. This study evaluates the impact of model architecture and scale on segmentation performance by comparing SAM2, a transformer-based vision model, with the lightweight YOLOv8 network. Both models were trained and tested on a newly collected dataset of 1,456 annotated RGB images of laptop components including logic boards, heat sinks, and fans, captured under varying illumination and orientation conditions. Data augmentation techniques, such as random rotation, flipping, and cropping, were applied to improve model robustness. YOLOv8 achieved higher segmentation accuracy (mAP50 = 98.8%, mAP50-95 = 85%) and stronger boundary precision than SAM2 (mAP50 = 8.4%). SAM2 demonstrated flexibility in representing diverse object structures but often produced overlapping masks and inconsistent contours. These findings show that large pre-trained models require task-specific optimization for industrial applications. The resulting dataset and benchmarking framework provide a foundation for developing scalable vision algorithms for robotic e-waste disassembly and circular manufacturing systems.
Figures & tables
| Aspect | SAM2 | YOLOv8 |
|---|---|---|
| Design objective | General-purpose and class-agnostic segmentation | Task-specific detection and segmentation |
| Training strategy | Pre-trained on SA-V dataset, and fine-tuned on target data | Trained from scratch on target dataset |
| Mask generation | Multiple candidate masks per image | One mask per detected object |
| Class assignment | Requires post-processing or prompting | Directly predicts class labels |
| Irregular shapes | Uses learned shape priors from diverse pre-training | Leans domain-specific features |
| Inference speed | Higher computational cost | Lightweight and real-time capable |
| Model | mAP 50 | mAP 50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| SAM2 | 8.4% | 9% |
| YOLOv8 | 98.8% | 85% |
Instance Segmentation
Instance segmentation identifies each object and assigns it a separate pixel-level mask in images or video.
See all 159 papers