Control Without Control: Defining Implicit Interaction Paradigms for Autonomous Assistive Robots

Assistive robots operating under shared autonomy must balance user control with autonomous assistance. Because robot actions depend on internal intent inference that is not directly observable, mismatches between inferred and intended goals can undermine coordination and trust. We investigate how interface-level transparency, including feedback modality (visual vs. auditory) and information richness (sparse vs. rich), shapes interaction in a vision-based shared autonomy system. In a user study with N=25 participants across two assistive manipulation tasks, we evaluate how these designs influence coordination and trust. Providing feedback significantly improves intent alignment and reduces corrective intervention, indicating that making the inferred goal legible accelerates convergence in shared control. Participants preferred visual over auditory feedback, while preferences for sparse versus rich information depended on task complexity. We also found that revealing the full belief distribution did not consistently improve alignment or trust. Together, these findings indicate that effective transparency enhances coordination primarily through goal legibility, while trust depends on task-appropriate information exposure rather than maximal disclosure. Based on these results, we outline guidelines for designing transparent shared autonomy systems.

Human movement is inherently variable, with variability structured according to task relevance: movements are typically more consistent at task-critical points and more flexible elsewhere. In human-robot interaction (HRI), however, model-based assistance strategies commonly assume deterministic human behavior and suppress such variability, potentially altering how interactions are experienced and lowering sense of agency. While movement variability is increasingly recognized as functionally meaningful, its deliberate preservation in assisted interaction, and its consequences for user experience, remain underexplored. In this paper, we empirically investigate how different assistance strategies shape human movement variability, task performance, and subjective interaction experience in a shared control setting. We introduce an autonomy-supportive shared control strategy that preserves users' natural movement structure. This approach is evaluated in a user study in which participants push an intelligent powered wheelchair under three conditions: no assistance, conventional variability-reducing assistance, and variability-preserving assistance. While task-relevant performance remained comparable across assisted modes, preserving natural movement variability led to more favorable interaction experiences. In particular, participants reported significantly higher perceived agency compared to conventional assistance and highest perceived usefulness. These findings suggest that variability-aware assistance can support both performance and user autonomy in physical human-robot collaboration. More broadly, the results highlight the importance of designing assistive robotic systems that respect the embodied structure of human movement rather than treating variability as noise to be neglected or eliminated.

Shared autonomy systems combine user input with autonomous assistance to help users with motor impairments control robot arms to perform everyday manipulation tasks, by inferring user goals and providing appropriate guidance. However, the robot's internal beliefs about user goals cannot be observed by users. Traditional shared autonomy systems provide assistance along efficient shortest paths toward inferred goals, but when multiple objects lie in similar directions, such assistive motion remains ambiguous and fails to reveal the specific goal identified by the robot. This creates two critical problems. First, when the robot correctly infers the goal, users continue controlling because they cannot perceive understanding from ambiguous assistive motion, wasting effort when autonomous completion would suffice. Second, when the robot misunderstands intent, users cannot quickly detect errors until assistive motion diverges significantly, requiring substantial corrective input. We address this by introducing legible motion into shared autonomy, where robot actions must both advance toward the goal and clearly reveal which goal has been inferred, enabling users to understand the robot's beliefs and adjust control accordingly. The robot modulates communication strength through confidence-aware adaptive authority allocation by providing assertive legible assistive actions when confident while increasing user authority when uncertain, transforming shared autonomy into transparent bidirectional collaboration. User studies including simulation, and physical experiments with a six-degree-of-freedom robot arm demonstrate that legible shared autonomy significantly improves users' understanding of robot beliefs and reduces user control effort compared to standard shared autonomy.