Edge-Based Standing-Water Detection via FSM-Guided Tiering and Multi-Model Consensus

Falls in wet bathroom environments are a major safety risk for seniors living alone. Recent work has shown that mmWave-only, vibration-only, and existing multimodal schemes, such as vibration-triggered radar activation, early feature concatenation, and decision-level score fusion, can support privacy-preserving, non-intrusive fall detection. However, these designs still treat motion and impact as loosely coupled streams, depending on coarse temporal alignment and amplitude thresholds, and do not explicitly encode the causal link between radar-observed collapse and floor impact or address timing drift, object drop confounders, and latency and energy constraints on low-power edge devices. To this end, we propose a two-stream architecture that encodes radar signals with a Motion--Mamba branch for long-range motion patterns and processes floor vibration with an Impact--Griffin branch that emphasizes impact transients and cross-axis coupling. Cross-conditioned fusion uses low-rank bilinear interaction and a Switch--MoE head to align motion and impact tokens and suppress object-drop confounders. The model keeps inference cost suitable for real-time execution on a Raspberry Pi 4B gateway. We construct a bathroom fall detection benchmark dataset with frame-level annotations, comprising more than 3~h of synchronized mmWave radar and triaxial vibration recordings across eight scenarios under running water, together with subject-independent training, validation, and test splits. On the test split, our model attains 96.1% accuracy, 94.8% precision, 88.0% recall, a 91.1% macro F1 score, and an AUC of 0.968. Compared with the strongest baseline, it improves accuracy by 2.0 percentage points and fall recall by 1.3 percentage points, while reducing latency from 35.9 ms to 15.8 ms and lowering energy per 2.56 s window from 14200 mJ to 10750 mJ on the Raspberry Pi 4B gateway.

Modern applications such as autonomous vehicles, intelligent surveillance, and smart city systems increasingly require object detection on resource-constrained edge devices. Yet, there is still limited understanding of how different object detection models behave across heterogeneous edge devices and under varying scene complexity. In this paper, we benchmark YOLOv8 (Nano, Small, Medium), EfficientDet Lite (Lite0, Lite1, Lite2), and SSD (SSD MobileNet V1, SSDLite MobileDet) on Raspberry Pi 3, 4, 5 with/without Coral TPU accelerators, Raspberry Pi 5 with AI HAT+, Jetson Nano, and Jetson Orin Nano. We evaluate energy consumption, inference time, and accuracy, and further examine how accuracy changes with the number of objects in the input image. The results reveal clear trade-offs among accuracy, latency, and energy efficiency across model-device combinations. SSD MobileNet V1 achieves the lowest latency and energy consumption but the lowest accuracy, whereas YOLOv8 Medium achieves the highest accuracy at higher computational cost. TPU-based Raspberry Pi devices improve the efficiency of SSD and EfficientDet Lite while reducing YOLOv8 accuracy. Orin Nano offers the most favorable overall balance across most model families. The object-count-based analysis further shows that models achieve more similar accuracy on simpler images, while the accuracy gap widens as scene complexity increases.

Geospatial foundation models can provide strong flood-segmentation performance, but their size limits deployment on memory-constrained edge hardware. We distill a 300-million-parameter Prithvi-EO-2.0 teacher, fine-tuned on the 252 manually labeled Sen1Floods11 training scenes, into a 0.7-million-parameter EfficientViT-B0 student. The teacher supervises additional unlabeled Sentinel-2 imagery, allowing the student training set to grow without new manual annotations. At the matched budget of 252 scenes, teacher-supervised training is competitive with direct training and improves STURM-Flood performance across tested configurations; a geometry-matched control shows that label source alone does not explain the difference. Scaling the teacher-supervised pool to 2,500 scenes narrows the remaining student--teacher gap: the float student reaches 0.787 water intersection over union on the Sen1Floods11 test split against 0.822 for the teacher, matches the teacher on STURM-Flood under our evaluation protocol, and remains below it on WorldFloods-v2. After activation replacement and quantization-aware training, the student runs as a 1.5-megabyte 8-bit integer (INT8) TensorRT engine on a Jetson Xavier NX at 5.57 milliseconds of graphics processing unit (GPU) compute per 512-by-512 image, with approximately 14 megabytes of runtime device memory. A fixed modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) threshold is competitive with both models on the two clean external benchmarks, so we interpret those benchmarks as generalization tests rather than as evidence of learned-model superiority over a spectral rule. The results support the conclusion: foundation-model supervision can amplify a fixed manual annotation budget into a substantially larger training set and yield a compact, deployable edge model.