An Auditable Policy-Simulation Framework for Student Dropout in Intervention-Free Data

Student dropout is a persistent concern in Learning Analytics, yet comparative studies frequently evaluate predictive models under heterogeneous protocols, prioritizing discrimination over temporal interpretability and calibration. This study introduces a survival-oriented benchmark for temporal dropout risk modelling using the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD). Two arms are compared: Family A: Dynamic Weekly, with models in person-period representation, and Family B: Static Early-Window, with an expanded roster of families: tree-based survival, parametric, and neural models. The evaluation protocol integrates four analytical layers: predictive performance, ablation, explainability, and calibration. Results are reported within each family separately, because a single numerical cross-family ranking would conflate genuine model differences with artifacts of temporal representation, to which survival metrics are known to be sensitive. Within Family B, Random Survival Forest showed the highest point estimates for time-dependent concordance and the lowest Brier scores across all three horizons; within Family A, Poisson Piecewise-Exponential showed the lowest point estimate for integrated Brier score within a tight five-model cluster. No-refit bootstrap resampling qualifies these positions as directional signals, not claims of strict superiority. Ablation and explainability analyses converged, across all models, on a shared finding: the dominant predictive signal was not primarily demographic or structural, but temporal and behavioral. Calibration corroborated this pattern in the better-discriminating models, except for XGBoost AFT, the sole outlier (analyzed in the Discussion). These results support unified, multi-dimensional benchmarking in Learning Analytics and situate dropout risk as a temporal-behavioral process rather than a function of static background attributes.

Learning analytics models can identify students at risk of poor performance, but they do not directly indicate which interventions are feasible, actionable, and compatible with educational constraints. This paper introduces SC2R, a semantics-constrained counterfactual recourse framework for educational decision support. SC2R combines a calibrated predictive model, integer-programming-based recourse generation over discrete action variables, a lightweight RDF vocabulary for intervention-plan representation, and SHACL validation for enforcing timing, budget, immutability, and availability constraints. The framework is evaluated offline on the OULAD dataset using snapshots constructed relative to each assessment at two decision horizons. Results show that the predictive component provides strong performance, that compact intervention plans can be generated at scale, and that semantic validation reveals infeasible plans that lighter optimization-only settings would otherwise accept. Rather than claiming causal improvement in student outcomes, this work shows that counterfactual recourse becomes more operationally meaningful in education when recommendations are not only model-valid, but also semantically feasible and machine-checkable.

Retrospective evaluation of early-warning models may not reflect information available when predictions are issued and outcomes become observable. We developed a time-synchronous prequential framework for online prediction of next-week student disengagement, operationalised as inactivity onset, from Moodle logs. Ordered by calendar time, models were updated only with available outcomes and remained unchanged for all predictions at each prediction cutoff; development, calibration and evaluation were chronologically separate. We compared stochastic gradient descent logistic regression (SGD-LR), online sequential extreme learning machine (OSELM) and echo state network (ESN) across predictive performance, fixed, frozen and rolling threshold policies, calendar-time variation and four behavioural feature sets. Held-out evaluation comprised 49,329 predictions with 37.68% inactivity-onset prevalence. Discrimination was similar (average precision 0.665-0.679; ROC-AUC 0.755-0.774). OSELM had the highest recall, SGD-LR the highest precision and specificity, and ESN the highest Matthews correlation coefficient and balanced accuracy. Lower thresholds increased recall and alert volume, whereas rolling adaptation did not improve MCC over frozen thresholds. Weekly performance and calibrated-probability distributions varied without sustained deterioration. During model selection, cumulative-and-temporal features achieved the highest individual-set AP, with modest gains from combining all feature groups. These findings indicate that streaming early-warning evaluation should consider calibration, threshold-dependent performance, alert burden and calendar-time variation alongside aggregate discrimination.