Social media research on mental health has focused predominantly on detecting and diagnosing conditions at the individual level. In this work, we shift attention to intergroup behavior, examining how two prominent neurodivergent communities, ADHD and autism, adjust their language when engaging with each other on Reddit. Grounded in Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), we first establish that each community maintains a distinct linguistic profile as measured by Language Inquiry and Word Count Lexicon (LIWC). We then show that these profiles shift in opposite directions when users cross community boundaries: features that are elevated in one group's home community decrease when its members post in the other group's space, and vice versa, consistent with convergent accommodation. The involvement of topic-independent summary variables (Authentic, Clout) in these shifts provides partial evidence against a purely topical explanation. Finally, in an exploratory longitudinal analysis around the moment of public diagnosis disclosure, we find that its effects on linguistic style are small and, in some cases, directionally opposite to cross-community accommodation, providing initial evidence that situational audience adaptation and longer-term identity processes may involve different mechanisms. Our findings contribute to understanding intergroup communication dynamics among neurodivergent populations online and carry implications for community moderation and clinical perspectives on these conditions.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Bidirectional linguistic accommodation between neurodivergent Reddit communities. r/ADHD (blue, n=7,758 ) is characterised by higher time , Authentic , achieve , and work ; r/autism (red, n=5,706 ) by higher Social , socrefs , Clout , and they . Each dot is a cross-posting user; colour shifts (blue → purple → red) indicate accommodation toward host norms.
Dataset
Users
Posts
Avg Words
Std
Subreddit
Comments
Submissions
ADHD in ADHD
7,758
199,020
85.94
112.21
r/ADHD
171,028
27,992
ADHD in Autism
788
12,621
70.96
113.82
r/autism
11,245
1,376
Autism in Autism
5,706
276,159
64.93
98.54
r/autism
248,597
27,562
Autism in ADHD
2,305
38,470
84.01
108.22
r/ADHD
31,947
6,523
Table 1: Descriptive statistics for cross-posting datasets. Users are non-overlapping between ADHD and autism diagnostic groups.
Figure 2: Study design. From the Mindset dataset, we extract ADHD- and autism-diagnosed users, partition their posts by subreddit into four cross-community datasets, apply LIWC-22 feature extraction with user-level aggregation, and conduct three experiments testing baseline differences (E1), cross-community accommodation (E2), and exploratory post-diagnosis changes (E3). Green boxes indicate supported hypotheses; yellow indicates partial/exploratory support.
Category
ADHD
Autism
d [95% CI]
time
5.62
3.93
0.76 [.72, .80]
achieve
1.59
0.95
0.60 [.56, .64]
Authentic
78.4
69.4
0.59 [.55, .63]
work
2.09
1.26
0.58 [.54, .62]
socrefs
5.05
6.68
− 0.56 [.52, .60]
substances
0.46
0.05
0.55 [.51, .59]
Table 2: Baseline linguistic differences (E1, top 10).
Category
ADHD → Aut.
Aut. → ADHD
d [95% CI]
d [95% CI]
Authentic
− .61 [.53,.69]
+ .33 [.29,.37]
time
− .70 [.62,.78]
+ .43 [.39,.47]
Social
+ .44 [.36,.52]
− .47 [.43,.51]
Clout
+ .43 [.35,.51]
− .31 [.27,.35]
socrefs
+ .45 [.37,.53]
− .47 [.43,.51]
Table 3: Cross-community accommodation (E2).
Category
Dataset
E2 d
E3 d
Authentic
ADHD → Aut.
−0.61
−0.09
Aut. → ADHD
+0.33
−0.12
Clout
ADHD → Aut.
+0.43
+0.11
Aut. → ADHD
−0.31
+0.11
Social
ADHD → Aut.
+0.44
−0.02
Aut. → ADHD
−0.47
+0.02
Table 4: E2 (accommodation) vs. E3 (post-diagnosis) effect sizes.
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 3: (a) Baseline differences (E1). (b) Cross-community accommodation (E2): mirror-imaged shifts across every category. (c) E2 vs. E3: accommodation (solid) is 3–23 × larger than post-diagnosis changes (light).
Category
ADHD
Autism
d
time
5.621
3.929
0.76
achieve
1.585
0.950
0.60
Authentic
78.41
69.37
0.59
work
2.091
1.255
0.58
socrefs
5.047
6.682
− 0.56
substances
0.462
0.050
0.55
Appendix
Table 5: Baseline differences (E1, top 15 by ∣d∣ ).
Category
Higher at E1
ADHD → Aut.
Aut. → ADHD
Authentic
ADHD
↓
↑
time
ADHD
↓
↑
Social
Autism
↑
↓
Clout
Autism
↑
↓
socrefs
Autism
↑
↓
health
ADHD
↓
↑
Appendix
Table 6: E1 baseline direction vs. E2 shift direction.
Dataset
Category
Pre
Post
Shift
d
95% CI
ADHD in Aut.
health
2.45
1.65
−0.80
−0.22
[ −.36 , −.08 ]
prep
11.12
10.25
−0.87
−0.20
[ −.34 , −.06 ]
Aut. in ADHD
Authentic
77.22
74.21
−3.00
−0.12
[ −.20 , −.04 ]
Clout
19.30
22.12
+2.82
+0.11
[ +.03 , +.19 ]
i
8.81
8.30
−0.51
−0.11
[ −.19 , −.03 ]
they
0.59
0.69
+0.11
+0.10
[ +.02 , +.18 ]
Appendix
Table 7: Longitudinal changes after diagnosis disclosure (exploratory E3).
Background: Depression frequently co-occurs with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but population-level differences in symptom expression between these groups remain underexplored. Objective: We examined whether social media users with ADHD and ASD differ in how they express DSM-5 depressive symptoms in their tweets, and whether differences persist across varying levels of depressive-content filtering. Methods: We analysed 1,282,437 tweets from 792 users (622 ADHD; 170 ASD) with self-reported diagnoses on Twitter. Tweets were pre-filtered for depressive relevance using zero-shot NLI, then classified into nine DSM-5 symptoms using MentalRoBERTa fine-tuned on ReDSM5. Profiles were mean-centered per user. We applied L1-penalised logistic regression with cross-validation to distinguish ADHD from ASD users, complemented by Pearson correlations for symptom co-occurrence, and tested robustness across five filtering thresholds using bootstrapping. Results: MentalRoBERTa achieved macro-F1 of 0.901 on a held-out set, outperforming the original ReDSM5 benchmark. ADHD vs ASD classification yielded stable but modest performance (cross-validated ROC-AUC 0.645-0.653). Cognitive issues, sleep issues, appetite change, and fatigue leaned toward ADHD, while suicidal ideation and anhedonia leaned toward ASD. A largely shared symptom co-occurrence structure emerged between groups; no pair met our criterion for a robust disorder-specific difference. Conclusions: Population-level differences in depression-related language between ADHD and ASD social media users were consistently observed across thresholds, reflecting reproducibility rather than clinical validity. Findings are exploratory and do not establish differing phenomenology at the individual level.
Muhammad Rizwan, David Nabergoj, Jure Demšar
Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
People share mental health diagnoses on social media, yet how such language becomes visible around their self-disclosure, and whether community engagement tracks it, remain unexamined across conditions. We analyze 89,605 Reddit posts from 739 users across eight conditions, removing each user's diagnosis disclosure and aligning their surrounding posts to that anchor. Within the pre-disclosure year, language-visible burden was highest in the month before disclosure for six conditions, earlier for post-traumatic stress disorder and furthest from it for borderline personality disorder, and remained visible afterward rather than resolving. The theme Seeking Clinical Explanations showed the largest early-to-late difference before disclosure in five conditions, yet engagement rarely tracked what users wrote: only 9 of 360 language--engagement correlations survived correction. Disclosure is therefore a waypoint in an unevenly visible process, and we offer implications for community practice and platform design where engagement metrics do not reflect clinical need.
Renkai Ma, Lingyao Li, Shanting Chen +3
College of Information Science University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona, USA · Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering University of Florida Gainesville, Florida, USA
Computational mental health research has predominantly centered on English-speaking populations, leaving Arabic-language discourse comparatively under-examined. We present an exploratory computational study of 8,147 tweets from 607 users classified by a GPT-4.1 personal-disclosure pipeline as likely lived-experience authors in three condition-specific Arabic-language X (formerly Twitter) Communities. We focus on discourse related to borderline personality disorder (BPD), bipolar disorder, and ADHD, and characterize community-associated linguistic patterns using a multi-domain cultural keyword framework. The results suggest that in this corpus, Bipolar tweets contain more religious and medical vocabulary, BPD tweets contain more relational, identity, and emotional-distress vocabulary, and ADHD tweets more often focus on practical symptoms and medication management. We treat these patterns as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory because the corpus is imbalanced across conditions, some subcorpora are temporally concentrated, and the keyword framework is an initial operationalization rather than a validated measurement instrument. The paper contributes a reusable LLM-assisted personal-disclosure pipeline and an exploratory cultural keyword framework for Arabic mental health discourse.
Amal Alqahtani, Rana Salama, Mona Diab
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia · King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA · Cairo University, Egypt +3