Organizations: Xinjiang Engineering Technology Research Center for Smart Education and Application, School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang, China. · Key Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430000,Hubei, China. · Hainan Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Central Avenue and East 13, Danzhou, 578001, Hainan, China. · Journalism & Communication College, Xinjiang University, No. 666 Shengli Road, Urumqi, 830046, Xinjiang, China.
In recent years, aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) has made rapid progress and shown strong practical value. However, existing research and benchmarks are largely concentrated on high-resource languages, leaving fine-grained sentiment extraction in low-resource languages under-explored. To address this gap, we constructed the first Low-resource languages Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple dataset, named LASQ, which includes two low-resource languages: Uzbek and Uyghur. Secondly, it includes a fine-grained target-aspect-opinion-sentiment quadruple extraction task. To facilitate future research, we designed a grid-tagging model that integrates syntactic knowledge. This model incorporates part-of-speech (POS) and dependency knowledge into the model through our designed Syntax Knowledge Embedding Module (SKEM), thereby alleviating the lexical sparsity problem caused by agglutinative languages. Experiments on LASQ demonstrate consistent gains over competitive baselines, validating both the dataset's utility and the effectiveness of the proposed modeling approach.
Figures & tables
Target
Aspect
Opinion
Sentiment
Multilingual
Low-resource
ASTE
✗
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
MAMS
✗
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
ACOS
✓
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
DiaASQ
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✗
Uzbek
✗
✓
✗
✓
✗
✓
Vietnamese
✗
✓
✗
✓
✗
✓
Table 1: Comparison between our dataset and existing ABSA datasets.
Figure 1: Input and output examples of our dataset. The text in parentheses represents the corresponding English translation.
Figure 2: LASQ dataset construction flowchart.
Figure 3: An example of annotation on the brat platform and its saved ANN format annotation result (bottom right corner of the figure). The example in the image is in Uzbek and means "This game interface design is very user-friendly."
# Doc.
# Sent.
# Token
# Entity
# Relation
# Quad.
T
A
O
TA
TO
AO
UZ
Train
2,451
6,146
101,061
2,471
7,075
8,697
7,884
8,712
9,348
9,384
Dev
306
780
12,705
307
841
1,031
943
1,031
1,097
1,100
Test
307
744
12,561
307
955
1,130
1,058
1,130
1,239
1,244
Total
3,064
7,670
126,327
3,085
8,871
10,858
9,885
10,873
11,684
11,728
UY
Train
2,422
8,539
90,184
2,427
6,767
8,248
7,577
8,250
9,202
9,231
Table 2: Statistics of our dataset. T/A/O represents target, aspect and opinion, and TA/TO/AO represents target-aspect pair, target-opinion pair and aspect-opinion pair. (Doc.: Document, Sent.: Sentence, Quad.: Quadruple).
Figure 4: (a) Our grid-tagging system. (b) Grid-tagging system in grid. The example in the image is in Uzbek and means "This game interface design is very user-friendly."
Figure 5: The overall architecture of our model. ⨁ and ⨂ represent matrix concatenation and matrix multiplication. The example in the image is in Uzbek and means "This game interface design is very user-friendly."
Hyperparameter
Value
Learning Rate (LLMs)
1e-5
Learning Rate (Others)
1e-3
Epochs
15
Batch Size
1
hp
20
hs
512
Table 3: Detailed hyperparameter settings.
Entity (F1)
Relation (F1)
Quadruple
T
A
O
TA
TO
AO
P
R
F1
UZ
EC-ACOS
64.06
23.32
44.75
16.41
30.92
15.16
16.94
8.72
11.51
Span-ASTE
65.21
24.29
46.81
17.92
32.17
16.83
18.96
10.31
13.36
ParaPhrase
63.16
22.86
47.87
16.91
33.50
15.89
22.27
8.96
12.78
Meta-WP
75.62
25.35
54.51
20.57
40.40
19.29
25.52
11.13
15.50
MRM-STS
73.52
26.52
50.57
21.05
39.70
20.26
18.66
12.82
15.90
Table 4: Comparison of our method with baseline models on our LASQ dataset. T/A/O represents target, aspect and opinion, and TA/TO/AO represents target-aspect pair, target-opinion pair and aspect-opinion pair. Bold represents the best results for each column under different language settings.The values in parentheses represent the variance of the results under three random numbers. ZS represents the zero-shot settings, and ICL represents the in-context learning settings.
Entity (F1)
Relation (F1)
Quadruple
T
A
O
TA
TO
AO
P
R
F1
UZ
Our Model
75.90
28.44
54.86
22.27
40.79
20.45
22.71
13.82
17.18
w/o POS
76.43
26.56
54.43
21.59
40.60
19.44
24.02
12.54
16.48
w/o Dependency
75.95
25.04
54.42
19.77
40.37
18.67
22.53
12.55
16.12
w/o SKEM
77.44
26.12
55.19
21.21
42.41
20.54
21.16
12.73
15.90
Random POS
76.32
24.55
53.77
19.96
40.67
18.65
24.00
12.005
16.04
Table 5: Ablation experiment.
Figure 6: Our method performs error analysis on quadruple extraction.
Case 1 (Gmail) : Gmail interfeysi qulay, lekin sinxronlash ba’zan sekin.
Table 6: Case study on Uzbek reviews about Google applications: effect of syntactic knowledge.
Training
Inference
(doc/s)
(doc/s)
UZ
EC-ACOS
5.60
14.35
Span-ASTE
5.15
14.79
ParaPhrase
10.36
9.74
Meta-WP
21.31
76.50
MRM-STS
5.06
13.30
Table 7: Efficiency analysis of our model and baseline models. “doc/s” represents the number of sentences processed per second.
Figure 7: We present the results of a more in-depth analysis of our LASQ dataset. Figure (a) shows the statistics for document length; Figure (b) shows the statistics for quadruples; Figure (c) shows the proportion of cross-sentence relations; and Figure (d) shows the proportion of entities with different morphological complexities.
Training models for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) tasks requires manually annotated data, which is expensive and time-consuming to obtain. This paper introduces LA-ABSA, a novel approach that leverages Large Language Model (LLM)-generated annotations to fine-tune lightweight models for complex ABSA tasks. We evaluate our approach on five datasets for Target Aspect Sentiment Detection (TASD) and Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction (ASQP). Our approach outperformed previously reported augmentation strategies and achieved competitive performance with LLM-prompting in low-resource scenarios, while providing substantial energy efficiency benefits. For example, using 50 annotated examples for in-context learning (ICL) to guide the annotation of unlabeled data, LA-ABSA achieved an F1 score of 49.85 for ASQP on the SemEval Rest16 dataset, closely matching the performance of ICL prompting with Gemma-3-27B (51.10), while requiring significantly lower computational resources.
Nils Constantin Hellwig, Jakob Fehle, Udo Kruschwitz +1
Media Informatics Group, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany · Information Science Group, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) extracts fine-grained opinions toward specific aspects within text but remains largely English-focused despite major advances in transformer-based and instruction-tuned models. This work presents a multilingual evaluation of state-of-the-art ABSA approaches across seven languages (English, German, French, Dutch, Russian, Spanish, and Czech) and four subtasks (ACD, ACSA, TASD, ASQP). We systematically compare different transformer architectures under zero-resource, data-only, and full-resource settings, using cross-lingual transfer, code-switching and machine translation. Fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve the highest overall scores, particularly in complex generative tasks, while few-shot counterparts approach this performance in simpler setups, where smaller encoder models also remain competitive. Cross-lingual training on multiple non-target languages yields the strongest transfer for fine-tuned LLMs, while smaller encoder or seq-to-seq models benefit most from code-switching, highlighting architecture-specific strategies for multilingual ABSA. We further contribute two new German datasets, an adapted GERestaurant and the first German ASQP dataset (GERest), to encourage multilingual ABSA research beyond English.
Jakob Fehle, Nils Constantin Hellwig, Udo Kruschwitz +1
Media Informatics Group, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany · Information Science Group, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) in Arabic must recover both explicitly stated aspects and implicit aspects that are never named in the text. Implicit identification typically relies on an auxiliary knowledge source (e.g., a knowledge graph (KG)) linking opinion cues to aspect categories, but for a lower-resource language the practitioner faces a design choice: reuse a mature English KG through multilingual embeddings, or build a smaller native Arabic KG. This paper reports a controlled comparison of the two strategies within a single hybrid pipeline, evaluated on three Arabic benchmarks (M-ABSA, SemEval-2016 Arabic, and HAAD). We further compare two adaptation strategies for the generative extractor that feeds the KG -- zero-shot prompting versus task-specific fine-tuning of an 8B-parameter large language model (LLM). The native Arabic KG (Strategy 2) outperforms the cross-lingual English KG (Strategy 1) by +0.199 micro-F1 on M-ABSA and +0.251 on SemEval-2016, gaining on both precision and recall. Task-specific fine-tuning raises explicit-extraction micro-F1 from <= 0.13 (zero-shot) to 0.66-0.76 on M-ABSA and SemEval-2016 (0.45 on the smaller HAAD), confirming that task adaptation, rather than model scale, is decisive in a morphologically rich language.
Lujain A. Alawwad
Department of Computing and Informatics Saudi Electronic University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia