Progressive Deep Learning for Automated Spheno-Occipital Synchondrosis Maturation Assessment
Authors: Omid Halimi Milani, Amanda Nikho, Marouane Tliba, Lauren Mills, Emadeldeen Hamdan, Ahmet Enis Cetin, Mohammed H. Elnagar
Organizations: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA · Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA · University of Orléans, Orléans, France
Accurate assessment of spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) maturation is a key indicator of craniofacial growth and a critical determinant for orthodontic and surgical timing. However, SOS staging from cone-beam CT (CBCT) relies on subtle, continuously evolving morphological cues, leading to high inter-observer variability and poor reproducibility, especially at transitional fusion stages. We frame SOS assessment as a fine-grained visual recognition problem and propose a progressive representation-learning framework that explicitly mirrors how expert clinicians reason about synchondral fusion: from coarse anatomical structure to increasingly subtle patterns of closure. Rather than training a full-capacity network end-to-end, we sequentially grow the model by activating deeper blocks over time, allowing early layers to first encode stable cranial base morphology before higher-level layers specialize in discriminating adjacent maturation stages. This yields a curriculum over network depth that aligns deep feature learning with the biological continuum of SOS fusion. Extensive experiments across convolutional and transformer-based architectures show that this expert-inspired training strategy produces more stable optimization and consistently higher accuracy than standard training, particularly for ambiguous intermediate stages. Importantly, these gains are achieved without changing network architectures or loss functions, demonstrating that training dynamics alone can substantially improve anatomical representation learning. The proposed framework establishes a principled link between expert dental intuition and deep visual representations, enabling robust, data-efficient SOS staging from CBCT and offering a general strategy for modeling other continuous biological processes in medical imaging.
Figures & tables
SOS Stage
Age Group
Stage
#
%
Group
#
%
Stage 1
159
22.0
Child (5 to 12)
281
38.9
Stage 2
92
12.7
Adolescent (13 to 19)
168
23.2
Stage 3
92
12.7
Adult (20 to 39)
116
16.0
Stage 4
125
17.3
Middle Age (40 to 59)
55
7.6
Stage 5
255
35.3
Senior Adult (60+)
9
1.2
Table 1: Expert-curated SOS CBCT dataset. We report 723 annotated scans across SOS maturation stages and subject age cohorts, highlighting class imbalance and broad age coverage.
Figure 2
Figure 3: Progressive-growing training. The backbone is expressed as an ordered sequence of blocks. At each stage, a single classification head is attached to the currently active depth and trained. Earlier heads are removed as deeper blocks are activated and training continues. At inference time, the final fully grown network is used with a single forward pass.
Model
N (blocks)
Stage block counts (n1,n2,n3,n4)
ResNet–18
8
(2,2,2,2)
ResNet–34
16
(4,4,4,4)
ResNet–50
16
(4,4,4,4)
ResNet–101
33
(8,8,8,9)
ResNet–152
50
(12,12,13,13)
Table 2: Exact four-stage partitioning used in Scenario 1.
Model
N (blocks)
Stage block counts (n1,n2)
ResNet–18
8
(4,4)
ResNet–34
16
(8,8)
ResNet–50
16
(8,8)
ResNet–101
33
(16,17)
ResNet–152
50
(25,25)
Table 3: Exact two-stage partitioning used in Scenario 2.
Figure 4: Illustration of progressive growing for Transformer encoders: at stage k , only the first k blocks are enabled and trained, while deeper blocks remain inactive until later stages.
Model
L
Stage sizes (∣J1∣,∣J2∣)
ViT-B/16
12
(6,6)
ViT-L/16
24
(12,12)
Table 4: Two-stage decomposition for ViT-B/16 and ViT-L/16.
Experiment
Model
Mode
Accuracy
Avg Metrics (Prec / Rec / F1)
Overall computation
320
ResNet-18
Entire
0.8603
0.8576 / 0.8603 / 0.8581
—
5, 5, 30, 280
ResNet-18
Progressive
0.8451
0.8451 / 0.8451 / 0.8440
89.3%
10, 290
ResNet-18
Progressive
0.8617
0.8599 / 0.8617 / 0.8595
96.8%
320
ResNet-101
Entire
0.8465
0.8433 / 0.8465 / 0.8441
—
5, 5, 30, 280
ResNet-101
Progressive
0.8600
0.8577 / 0.8589 / 0.8565
93.2%
400
ViT-B/16
Entire
0.4412
0.5165 / 0.4412 / 0.4325
—
Table 5: Comparison of entire-model and progressive-growing training across CNN and ViT backbones, including 32-patch ViT models with 50% patch overlap. Standard ResNet-18 training achieves an accuracy of 0.8603 after 320 epocs. Progressive training achieves an accuracy of 0.8617.
College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China · Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China +1
College of Cryptology and Cyber Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350, China · College of Engineering, Yanbian University, Yanji, 133002, Jilin, China · Haihe Lab of ITAI, Tianjin, 300350, China +1