Recently, scaling reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models (LLMs) has emerged as an effective training paradigm for significantly improving model capabilities, which requires guiding the model to perform extensive exploration and learning, leading to substantial computational overhead and becoming a key challenge. To reduce the number of training steps, Prior work performs linear extrapolation of model parameters. However, the dynamics of model parameter updates during RLVR training remain insufficiently understood. To further investigate the evolution of LLMs during RLVR training, we conduct empirical experiments and find that the rank-1 subspace of the model does not evolve linearly, and its dominance over the original parameters is further amplified during LoRA training. Based on the above insights, we propose the Nonlinear Extrapolation of low-rank trajectories (NExt), a novel framework that models and extrapolates low-rank parameter trajectories in a nonlinear manner. Concretely, we first train the model using LoRA and extract the rank-1 subspace of parameter differences at multiple training steps, which is then used for the subsequent nonlinear extrapolation. Afterward, we utilized the extracted rank-1 subspace to train a predictor, which can model the trajectory of parameter updates during RLVR, and then perform the predict-extend process to extrapolate model parameters, achieving the acceleration of RLVR. To further study and understand NExt, we conduct comprehensive experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the method. Our method reduces computational overhead by approximately 37.5% while remaining compatible with a wide range of RLVR algorithms and tasks. We release our code in https://github.com/RUCAIBox/NExt.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison between vanilla RLVR and model parameter extrapolation. The vanilla RLVR consumes huge computational resources, while the extrapolation method can skip the intermediate training steps and predict the model parameters in the future checkpoint.
Figure 2
Figure 4: The overview of our NExt, containing extracting reasoning patterns (Section 4.1 ) and extrapolating model parameters (Section 4.2 ) processes. Concretely, we first utilize LoRA-based RLVR to train the LLM and save the intermediate checkpoints. Next, we extract the rank-1 subspace of the difference between these saved checkpoints, and these deltas are utilized to train the predictor. Finally, the well-trained predictor will predict the model parameters, achieving the extrapolation.
Methods
Stage
Trained Param.
Extrapolation
Extrapolated Param.
WSM Tian et al. (2025)
Pre-training
Full Parameters
Linear
Full Parameters
MAEC Chen et al. (2025d)
Pre-training
Key Neurons
Linear
Key Neurons
DARE Yu et al. (2024)
SFT
Full Parameters
Linear
Randomly Selected
Greedy Soup Wortsman et al. (2022)
SFT
Full Parameters
Linear
Full Parameters
AlphaRL Wang et al. (2026b)
RLVR
Full Parameters
Linear
Rank-1 Subspace
RL-Extra Cai et al. (2025)
RLVR
Full Parameters
Linear
Full Parameters
Table 1: Comparison between our NExt and previous work, containing the methods for different training stages.
Process
Hyperparameters
Value
Train
Train Batch Size
128
Mini Batch Size
32
Num. Rollout
8
Rollout Temperature
1.0
Rollout top_p
1.0
Max Prompt Length
1024
Table 2: The hyperparameters used in our experiments.
Methods
#Steps
AIME24
AIME25
AMC23
Minerva
OlymMATH
Avg.
ICER ( ↓ )
Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
Backbone Model
-
10.0
5.4
51.9
22.9
5.3
19.1
-
+ GRPO w/ FP
250
13.8
11.7
59.1
24.9
6.0
23.1
62.5
+ GRPO w/ LoRA
250
13.3
10.8
56.3
24.9
5.0
22.1
83.3
+ GRPO w/ FP
400
16.3
11.3
59.7
25.9
6.8
24.0
81.6
+ GRPO w/ LoRA
400
16.7
11.7
59.4
24.7
5.0
23.5
90.9
Table 3: Accuracy of LLMs with larger than 7B parameters trained through different methods on mathematical tasks. The best is in bold.
Methods
#Steps
Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct
AMC23
Minerva
Avg.
ICER ( ↓ )
AMC23
Minerva
Avg.
ICER ( ↓ )
Backbone Model
-
16.3
7.4
11.9
-
31.3
15.7
23.5
-
+ GRPO w/ FP
250
26.7
11.1
18.9
35.7
40.6
18.3
29.5
41.7
+ GRPO w/ LoRA
250
29.4
11.2
20.3
29.8
36.9
17.6
27.3
65.8
+ GRPO w/ FP
400
31.3
10.8
21.1
43.5
42.5
18.8
30.7
55.6
+ GRPO w/ LoRA
400
30.0
11.5
20.8
44.9
40.0
18.8
29.4
67.8
Table 4: Accuracy of LLMs with fewer than 3B parameters trained through different methods on mathematical tasks. The best is in bold.
Figure 5: The comparison of server usage between NExt and GRPO.
Methods
Predict-Extend Process
RLVR after Extrapolation
AMC23
Minerva
Avg.
ICER ( ↓ )
AMC23
Minerva
Avg.
ICER ( ↓ )
Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
NExt (Ours)
26.3
11.2
18.8
21.7
31.3
11.8
21.6
25.8
w/o LoRA
23.8
11.4
17.6
26.3
28.1
11.5
19.8
31.6
w/o G-Delta
21.3
10.4
15.9
37.5
28.8
10.8
19.8
31.6
w/o L-Delta
23.1
9.9
16.5
32.6
26.9
10.2
18.6
37.3
Table 5: Ablation study of our NExt. “ w/o LoRA” denotes that the RLVR process optimizes full parameters in LLMs. “ w/o G-Delta” and “ w/o L-Delta” refer to extrapolation without global delta and local delta, respectively.
Figure 6: Performance on mathematical tasks as the extending coefficient α varies from 0.5 to 4.0.
Methods
#Steps
Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct
AMC23
Minerva
Avg.
AMC23
Minerva
Avg.
Backbone Model
-
16.3
7.4
11.9
31.3
15.7
23.5
+ RLOO
250
20.0
7.4
13.7
34.4
16.3
25.4
+ RLOO
400
22.5
8.3
15.4
37.5
17.0
27.3
+ RLOO w / NExt
250
24.4
10.6
17.5
38.4
18.5
28.5
+ REINFORCE++
250
17.5
7.8
12.7
33.1
16.3
24.7
Table 6: Performance of NExt adapted to different RLVR algorithms.
Figure 7: Comparison of performance and computational cost of LLMs trained through different methods on the GPQA task.
Methods
Biology
Business
Chemistry
CS
Economics
Engineering
Health
Avg.
Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
Backbone
33.3
23.0
14.9
14.6
29.8
11.6
19.1
20.9
+ GRPO
48.3
39.8
22.1
27.4
40.5
13.2
26.4
31.1
+ AlphaRL
44.2
38.2
21.7
21.1
41.7
15.9
27.9
30.1
+ RL-Extra
42.1
35.1
20.5
23.8
42.1
10.2
24.1
28.3
+ NExt (Ours)
46.8
40.1
22.7
28.7
39.8
13.2
25.7
31.0
Table 7: Accuracy of LLMs at different scales on the MMLU-Pro sub-benchmarks (Part 1). We perform 400 training steps on GRPO and 250 training steps for other methods.
Methods
History
Law
Math
Philosophy
Physics
Psychology
Other
Avg.
Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
Backbone
16.2
8.5
29.1
14.5
16.1
21.7
18.0
17.7
+ GRPO
18.8
19.4
44.7
19.8
21.2
39.8
26.4
27.2
+ AlphaRL
16.1
17.0
40.6
20.9
18.0
40.3
26.7
25.7
+ RL-Extra
19.3
16.5
38.7
16.9
20.7
38.8
27.2
25.4
+ NExt (Ours)
17.6
18.3
45.2
20.9
22.0
41.1
26.1
27.3
Table 8: Accuracy of LLMs at different scales on the MMLU-Pro sub-benchmarks (Part 2). We perform 400 training steps on GRPO and 250 training steps for other methods.
Reinforcement learning post-training adapts pretrained models with reward or feedback signals to improve reasoning, alignment, and interactive behavior.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a dominant paradigm for improving reasoning in large language models (LLMs), yet the underlying geometry of the resulting parameter trajectories remains underexplored. In this work, we demonstrate that RLVR weight trajectories are extremely low-rank and highly predictable. Specifically, we find that the majority of downstream performance gains are captured by a rank-1 approximation of the parameter deltas, where the magnitude of this projection evolves near-linearly with training steps. Motivated by this, we propose a simple and compute-efficient method RELEX (REinforcement Learning EXtrapolation), which estimates the rank-1 subspace from a short observation window and extrapolates future checkpoints via linear regression, with no learned model required. Across three models (i.e., Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, Qwen3-4B-Base, and Qwen3-8B-Base), RELEX produces checkpoints that match or exceed RLVR performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks, requiring as few as 15% steps of full RLVR training. Remarkably, RELEX is able to extrapolate far beyond the observation window at no training cost, predicting checkpoints up to 10-20× beyond the observed prefix with continued improvement (e.g., observe only the first 50 steps and extrapolate to 1000 steps). Our ablation analysis confirms the minimalist sufficiency of RELEX: neither increasing the subspace rank nor employing non-linear modeling yields further gains in extrapolation. Finally, we show that RELEX's success stems from a "denoising" effect: by projecting updates onto the rank-1 subspace, the model discards stochastic optimization noise that would otherwise degrade performance during extrapolation. Our code is available at https://github.com/weizhepei/RELEX.
Zhepei Wei, Xinyu Zhu, Wei-Lin Chen +3
University of Virginia · Washington University in St. Louis
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, methods such as GRPO and DAPO suffer from substantial computational cost, since they rely on sampling many rollouts for each prompt. Moreover, in RLVR the relative advantage is often sparse: many samples become nearly all-correct or all-incorrect, yielding low within-group reward variance and thus weak learning signals. In this paper, we introduce arrol (Accelerating RLVR via online Rollout Pruning), an online rollout pruning method that prunes rollouts during generation while explicitly steering the surviving ones more correctness-balanced to enhance learning signals. Specifically, arrol trains a lightweight quality head on-the-fly to predict the success probability of partial rollouts and uses it to make early pruning decisions. The learned quality head can further weigh candidates to improve inference accuracy during test-time scaling. To improve efficiency, we present a system design that prunes rollouts inside the inference engine and re-batches the remaining ones for log-probability computation and policy updates. Across GRPO and DAPO on Qwen-3 and LLaMA-3.2 models (1B-8B), arrol improves average accuracy by +2.30 to +2.99 while achieving up to 1.7x training speedup, and yielding up to +8.33 additional gains in average accuracy in test-time scaling. The code is available at https://github.com/Hsu1023/ARRoL.
Haobo Xu, Sirui Chen, Ruizhong Qiu +5
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign · Amazon
Reinforcement learning has greatly advanced the capabilities of large language models, but its memory demands remain a barrier to broader adoption. We introduce LoGRA, an approach to RL post-training that reduces memory by retaining useful learning signals in low-rank gradient sketches. These compact representations support both model updates and efficient policy synchronization. To prevent overly large updates from disrupting learning, we complement gradient compression with predicted-KL step control, which estimates policy changes before applying each update and adjusts its magnitude accordingly. With all techniques combined, LoGRA reduces average training memory usage by up to 45.7% across reasoning tasks without compromising performance. It also enables stable training of a 27B-parameter model for over 1,100 steps on a single eight-GPU node, where dense Adam runs out of memory, making previously memory-infeasible RL training practical. Code is available in the Molt library.