Low-rank Optimization Trajectories Modeling for LLM RLVR Acceleration
Organizations: Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China. · China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing).
Abstract
Recently, scaling reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models (LLMs) has emerged as an effective training paradigm for significantly improving model capabilities, which requires guiding the model to perform extensive exploration and learning, leading to substantial computational overhead and becoming a key challenge. To reduce the number of training steps, Prior work performs linear extrapolation of model parameters. However, the dynamics of model parameter updates during RLVR training remain insufficiently understood. To further investigate the evolution of LLMs during RLVR training, we conduct empirical experiments and find that the rank-1 subspace of the model does not evolve linearly, and its dominance over the original parameters is further amplified during LoRA training. Based on the above insights, we propose the Nonlinear Extrapolation of low-rank trajectories (NExt), a novel framework that models and extrapolates low-rank parameter trajectories in a nonlinear manner. Concretely, we first train the model using LoRA and extract the rank-1 subspace of parameter differences at multiple training steps, which is then used for the subsequent nonlinear extrapolation. Afterward, we utilized the extracted rank-1 subspace to train a predictor, which can model the trajectory of parameter updates during RLVR, and then perform the predict-extend process to extrapolate model parameters, achieving the acceleration of RLVR. To further study and understand NExt, we conduct comprehensive experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the method. Our method reduces computational overhead by approximately 37.5% while remaining compatible with a wide range of RLVR algorithms and tasks. We release our code in https://github.com/RUCAIBox/NExt.
Figures & tables
| Methods | Stage | Trained Param. | Extrapolation | Extrapolated Param. |
| WSM Tian et al. (2025) | Pre-training | Full Parameters | Linear | Full Parameters |
| MAEC Chen et al. (2025d) | Pre-training | Key Neurons | Linear | Key Neurons |
| DARE Yu et al. (2024) | SFT | Full Parameters | Linear | Randomly Selected |
| Greedy Soup Wortsman et al. (2022) | SFT | Full Parameters | Linear | Full Parameters |
| AlphaRL Wang et al. (2026b) | RLVR | Full Parameters | Linear | Rank-1 Subspace |
| RL-Extra Cai et al. (2025) | RLVR | Full Parameters | Linear | Full Parameters |
| Process | Hyperparameters | Value |
| Train | Train Batch Size | 128 |
| Mini Batch Size | 32 | |
| Num. Rollout | 8 | |
| Rollout Temperature | 1.0 | |
| Rollout top_p | 1.0 | |
| Max Prompt Length | 1024 |
| Methods | #Steps | AIME24 | AIME25 | AMC23 | Minerva | OlymMATH | Avg. | ICER ( ) |
| Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | ||||||||
| Backbone Model | - | 10.0 | 5.4 | 51.9 | 22.9 | 5.3 | 19.1 | - |
| + GRPO w/ FP | 250 | 13.8 | 11.7 | 59.1 | 24.9 | 6.0 | 23.1 | 62.5 |
| + GRPO w/ LoRA | 250 | 13.3 | 10.8 | 56.3 | 24.9 | 5.0 | 22.1 | 83.3 |
| + GRPO w/ FP | 400 | 16.3 | 11.3 | 59.7 | 25.9 | 6.8 | 24.0 | 81.6 |
| + GRPO w/ LoRA | 400 | 16.7 | 11.7 | 59.4 | 24.7 | 5.0 | 23.5 | 90.9 |
| Methods | #Steps | Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct | Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct | ||||||
| AMC23 | Minerva | Avg. | ICER ( ) | AMC23 | Minerva | Avg. | ICER ( ) | ||
| Backbone Model | - | 16.3 | 7.4 | 11.9 | - | 31.3 | 15.7 | 23.5 | - |
| + GRPO w/ FP | 250 | 26.7 | 11.1 | 18.9 | 35.7 | 40.6 | 18.3 | 29.5 | 41.7 |
| + GRPO w/ LoRA | 250 | 29.4 | 11.2 | 20.3 | 29.8 | 36.9 | 17.6 | 27.3 | 65.8 |
| + GRPO w/ FP | 400 | 31.3 | 10.8 | 21.1 | 43.5 | 42.5 | 18.8 | 30.7 | 55.6 |
| + GRPO w/ LoRA | 400 | 30.0 | 11.5 | 20.8 | 44.9 | 40.0 | 18.8 | 29.4 | 67.8 |
| Methods | Predict-Extend Process | RLVR after Extrapolation | ||||||
| AMC23 | Minerva | Avg. | ICER ( ) | AMC23 | Minerva | Avg. | ICER ( ) | |
| Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct | ||||||||
| NExt (Ours) | 26.3 | 11.2 | 18.8 | 21.7 | 31.3 | 11.8 | 21.6 | 25.8 |
| w/o LoRA | 23.8 | 11.4 | 17.6 | 26.3 | 28.1 | 11.5 | 19.8 | 31.6 |
| w/o G-Delta | 21.3 | 10.4 | 15.9 | 37.5 | 28.8 | 10.8 | 19.8 | 31.6 |
| w/o L-Delta | 23.1 | 9.9 | 16.5 | 32.6 | 26.9 | 10.2 | 18.6 | 37.3 |
| Methods | #Steps | Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct | Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct | ||||
| AMC23 | Minerva | Avg. | AMC23 | Minerva | Avg. | ||
| Backbone Model | - | 16.3 | 7.4 | 11.9 | 31.3 | 15.7 | 23.5 |
| + RLOO | 250 | 20.0 | 7.4 | 13.7 | 34.4 | 16.3 | 25.4 |
| + RLOO | 400 | 22.5 | 8.3 | 15.4 | 37.5 | 17.0 | 27.3 |
| + RLOO w / NExt | 250 | 24.4 | 10.6 | 17.5 | 38.4 | 18.5 | 28.5 |
| + REINFORCE++ | 250 | 17.5 | 7.8 | 12.7 | 33.1 | 16.3 | 24.7 |
| Methods | Biology | Business | Chemistry | CS | Economics | Engineering | Health | Avg. |
| Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct | ||||||||
| Backbone | 33.3 | 23.0 | 14.9 | 14.6 | 29.8 | 11.6 | 19.1 | 20.9 |
| + GRPO | 48.3 | 39.8 | 22.1 | 27.4 | 40.5 | 13.2 | 26.4 | 31.1 |
| + AlphaRL | 44.2 | 38.2 | 21.7 | 21.1 | 41.7 | 15.9 | 27.9 | 30.1 |
| + RL-Extra | 42.1 | 35.1 | 20.5 | 23.8 | 42.1 | 10.2 | 24.1 | 28.3 |
| + NExt (Ours) | 46.8 | 40.1 | 22.7 | 28.7 | 39.8 | 13.2 | 25.7 | 31.0 |
| Methods | History | Law | Math | Philosophy | Physics | Psychology | Other | Avg. |
| Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct | ||||||||
| Backbone | 16.2 | 8.5 | 29.1 | 14.5 | 16.1 | 21.7 | 18.0 | 17.7 |
| + GRPO | 18.8 | 19.4 | 44.7 | 19.8 | 21.2 | 39.8 | 26.4 | 27.2 |
| + AlphaRL | 16.1 | 17.0 | 40.6 | 20.9 | 18.0 | 40.3 | 26.7 | 25.7 |
| + RL-Extra | 19.3 | 16.5 | 38.7 | 16.9 | 20.7 | 38.8 | 27.2 | 25.4 |
| + NExt (Ours) | 17.6 | 18.3 | 45.2 | 20.9 | 22.0 | 41.1 | 26.1 | 27.3 |
RL Post-Training
Reinforcement learning post-training adapts pretrained models with reward or feedback signals to improve reasoning, alignment, and interactive behavior.
See all 425 papers