The motion planning problem requires finding a collision-free path between start and goal configurations in high-dimensional, cluttered spaces. Recent learning-based methods offer promising solutions, with self-supervised physics-informed approaches such as Neural Time Fields (NTFields) solving the Eikonal equation to learn value functions without expert demonstrations. However, existing physics-informed methods struggle to scale in complex, multi-room environments, where simply increasing the number of samples cannot resolve local minima or guarantee global consistency. We propose Hierarchical Neural Time Fields (H-NTFields), a weakly-supervised framework that combines weak supervision from sparse roadmaps with physics-informed PDE regularization. The roadmap provides global topological anchors through upper and lower bounds on travel times, while PDE losses enforce local geometric fidelity and obstacle-aware propagation. Experiments on 18 Gibson environments and real robotic platforms show that H-NTFields substantially improves robustness over prior physics-informed methods, while enabling fast amortized inference through a continuous value representation.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1 : Comparison of speed and time fields in a Gibson environment. The full model produces smooth time fields with correct obstacle-aware connectivity, closely matching the ground-truth from FMM. In contrast, the PDE-only variant collapses into local minima (lower-left region), while the roadmap-only variant preserves global contours but fails to capture fine obstacle geometry.
Methods
Performance Metrics
Time (sec) ↓
Length
SR (%) ↑
Ours
0.115±0.071
0.72±0.46
90.8
Roadmap only
0.105±0.071
0.77±0.52
68.5
PDE only
0.089±0.053
0.68±0.46
60.0
TABLE I : Quantitative ablation study on Gibson environments. The full H-NTFields model achieves the highest success rate while maintaining comparable planning time to the ablated variants. PDE-only reduces average path length slightly but fails in long-horizon tasks, while roadmap-only improves global consistency yet misses fine obstacle fidelity, leading to lower overall performance.
Data
Performance Metrics
Sample ↓
Roadmap ↓
SR (Ours) ↑
SR (PDE) ↑
10k
0.23
14.3
61.4
20.0
20k
0.26
16.3
82.5
26.6
50k
0.32
17.6
90.8
59.8
100k
0.42
18.1
92.7
75.1
200k
0.63
18.4
92.0
76.8
TABLE II : Scalability study on Gibson environments. H-NTFields achieves 90.8% success with only 50k training pairs, while TD-NTFields requires 200k samples to reach just 76.8%—lower than H-NTFields trained with only 20k. Reported costs (seconds) include sample generation and roadmap construction/query, showing that combining sparse roadmap supervision with PDE regularization yields both efficiency and scalability.
Fig. 2 : Path comparison in a Gibson environment. The figure shows paths generated by different planners for the same start–goal query. NTFields, P-NTFields, and TD-NTFields fail to produce viable paths. Our method successfully generates a smooth trajectory (orange) in 0.22s. RRTConnect (yellow) and Lazy-PRM (cyan) find valid paths but are slower (3.33s and 3.99s). FMM (green) runs faster (0.98s) but produces paths with some sharp turns due to grid discretization.
Methods
Performance Metrics
Time (sec) ↓
Length
SR (%) ↑
Ours
0.115±0.071
0.72±0.46
90.8
NTFields
0.076±0.053
0.75±0.94
27.2
P-NTFields
0.076±0.064
0.74±0.85
37.2
TD-NTFields
0.081±0.051
0.72±0.46
76.8
RRTConnect
1.165±1.876
0.71±0.41
98.8
TABLE III : Comparison for all motion planning methods in 18 Gibson environments. It can be seen that our method exhibits much higher SR than other physics-informed methods with relatively slower planning times. The relatively slow planning times are due to our method solving much harder cases, where the start and goal span across multiple rooms.
Physically consistent motion planning remains a fundamental challenge in embodied AI, as generated trajectories must strictly conform to real-world execution dynamics. While latent world models offer a promising approach by predicting these dynamics, existing methods learn unconstrained future representations where absorbed physics remains implicit. Therefore, they fail to form reusable physical knowledge, which compromises reliability in unpredictable open-world navigation. To address this, we propose a novel Energy-Structured Latent World Model (ELWM). Our key idea is to structure the ELWM latent state to explicitly carry energy and momentum, ensuring strictly causal transitions via dissipation and control ports. Trained on multimodal RGB-D and inertial interaction histories, our model guarantees physically consistent predictions. We further implement this for motion planning by constructing Physics-Conditioned Neural Time Fields (PC-NTF), a key technical cornerstone that integrates ELWM into an arrival time field via the Eikonal equation to yield a physically-informed navigation policy. Across held-out scenes, our evaluation reveals significant improvements. Compared to generic latent models, PC-NTF reduces 0.8-s motion-prediction NRMSE from 0.36 to 0.29. Against Active Neural Time Fields, it improves navigation success from 81.3% to 89.7% and SPL from 0.64 to 0.73, while cutting the physical collision rate from 12.1% to 5.8% and the Eikonal residual from 0.083 to 0.031. Beyond these targeted gains, our results demonstrate that embedding explicit physical structures into latent spaces intrinsically bridges the gap between predictive world models and safe, dynamically feasible motion planning.
Yapeng Liu, Yuanzhao Zhai, Bo Ding +2
PDL Lab, College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology
Rigid-body motion planning is fundamental to robotic transport and manipulation, where both object position and orientation determine whether a body can move through cluttered environments. This coupling makes planning chal- lenging because translation and rotation can be constrained very differently by surrounding geometry. We propose Shape- Aware Neural Time Fields, a physics-informed neural motion planning framework that learns a reusable travel-time, or cost- to-go, representation for rigid-body motion while explicitly accounting for these distinct geometric restrictions. The learned field captures local motion difficulty in translation and rotation and is paired with a sampling-based planner that balances progress toward the goal with the cost of reaching nearby poses. We evaluate the framework across 2D and 3D rigid- body planning tasks and non-prehensile manipulation through object pushing in diverse environments. Results show substantial improvements in planning success and inference efficiency over physics-informed neural planning baselines, while remaining competitive with classical sampling-based planners at significantly lower planning times. Ablation studies further validate the contributions of both the learned representation and the proposed planning strategy. Finally, closed-loop pushing experiments under execution deviations and external disturbances demonstrate that fast replanning enables reactive and adaptive task execution.
Yanming Zhou, Yuchen Liu, Ahmed H. Qureshi
Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
We introduce Neural Navigation Functions (Neural-NF), a learned reactive navigation function capable of zero-shot transfer across unseen environment geometries. Neural-NF places data-driven adaptation within a structured elliptic planner, where the navigation objective is learned while planner structure is preserved by construction. Specifically, intrinsic Laplacian-derived features are mapped to local PDE coefficients, and solving the resulting boundary value problem produces a globally consistent value function on each target domain. For every admissible learned model, the resulting policy is collision-free, provides monotonic descent and a global minimum at the goal by construction. This admits a linearly-solvable optimal-control interpretation for any parameter setting. Empirically, Neural-NF achieves strong zero-shot transfer across diverse geometries and outperforms learned planners that directly predict the value function by up to a 5× improvement.
Benjamin D. Shaffer, Pei-An Hsieh, Brooks Kinch +2
University of Pennsylvania, United States 1Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics · University of Pennsylvania, United States 2Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering