We introduce SAGE Celer 2.6, the latest in our line of general-purpose Celer models from SAGEA. Celer 2.6 is available in 5B, 10B, and 27B parameter sizes and benefits from extensive architectural modifications and further pre-training on an undisclosed model. Using our Inverse Reasoning (IR) pipeline, SAGEA natively trains Celer 2.6 to validate its own logic paths, minimizing cascading error and hallucination in complex reasoning tasks. Celer 2.6 also boasts natively integrated multimodal functionality with an end-to-end vision encoder to avoid common pitfalls in adapter-based approaches. Celer 2.6 provides highly competitive results on mathematics, coding, and general intelligence benchmarks (ACUMEN), along with low latency. Most importantly, Celer 2.6 is specifically optimized for South Asian language support, with a custom tokenizer for the Devanagari script and strong performance in both Nepali and Hindi without sacrificing English reasoning ability.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Performance overview of SAGE Celer 2.6 High relative to SAGE Actus 2.4 and Llama 3.3 70B on standard benchmarks. All metrics reported as of March 2026.
Language
Tokenization Framework
English
Standard Tokenization
Chinese
Standard Tokenization
Dutch
Standard Tokenization
French
Standard Tokenization
Nepali
Bespoke Devanagari Tokenization
Hindi
Bespoke Devanagari Tokenization
Table 1: Supported languages and their respective tokenization frameworks in Celer 2.6.
Language
Llama 3 Tokenizer
Qwen 2.5 Tokenizer
Celer 2.6 Native
English
120
115
118
Nepali (Devanagari)
845
312
296
Hindi (Devanagari)
810
295
288
Table 2: Tokens required to encode a standard 100-word news passage in English and Devanagari scripts.
Model
MMMU
DocVQA
MathVista
AI2D
ChartQA
Celer 2.6 High (27B)
58.4
91.2
62.1
82.4
83.5
InternVL2 (26B)
51.2
92.9
59.4
84.5
84.9
Qwen2-VL (72B)
64.5
94.0
65.2
86.5
88.1
Llama 3.2 Vision (11B)
50.7
85.1
51.5
78.4
76.2
Table 3: Multimodal benchmark performance of Celer 2.6 High vs frontier vision-language models ( 1 ; 3 ; 15 ) .
Model
MMLU
MMLU-Pro
MATH-500
HumanEval
ACUMEN
Celer 2.6 High (27B)
87.1
78.4
83.2
88.6
71.8
SAGE Actus 2.4 (32B)
89.67
75.60
78.87
86.2
71.8
DeepSeek-R1-Distill (32B)
90.8
84.0
97.3
90.2
68.4
Llama 3.3 70B
86.0
68.9
77.0
88.4
71.3
Qwen 2.5 32B
85.3
73.1
82.4
88.2
67.2
Gemma 3 27B-IT
76.9
67.5
74.2
87.8
63.8
Table 4: Evaluation of Celer 2.6 High against SAGE Actus 2.4, frontier reasoning specialists, and Tier L baselines.
Model
MMLU
MMLU-Pro
MATH-500
HumanEval
ACUMEN
Celer 2.6 Mid (10B)
80.2
71.8
73.6
83.8
68.4
Phi-4 14B
84.8
70.1
80.4
82.6
65.2
Qwen 2.5 14B
79.7
65.4
72.1
82.3
63.8
Gemma 3 12B-IT
71.9
58.2
66.4
85.4
61.4
Llama 3.1 8B-Instruct
68.4
44.3
51.9
62.1
54.2
Celer 2.6 Low (5B)
74.8
67.2
69.4
79.2
63.6
Table 5: Evaluation of Celer 2.6 Mid and Low against Tier S baselines. 2 2 2 Llama 3.1 8B-Instruct is intentionally repeated in both blocks as a shared anchor baseline, enabling direct comparison between the Mid and Low blocks without introducing cross-block normalization artifacts.
Figure 2: Needle-in-a-Haystack evaluation across SAGE Celer 2.6 variants and Celer 2.5 High, ensembled over diverse document sources. Context length on X axis, needle position depth on Y axis. Green indicates high recall, red indicates degraded retrieval.
Configuration
Celer 2.6 High (27B)
Celer 2.6 Mid (10B)
Celer 2.6 Low (5B)
Celer 2.5 High (14B)
All context lengths
98.1
95.2
91.8
92.6
Maximum context length
94.0
91.0
88.0
90.0
Table 6: Needle-in-a-Haystack Recall Summary (%)
Figure 3: Comparison of average recall achieved by SAGE Celer models as context length grows.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Category
Refusal Rate (%)
False Positives (%)
Malware / Zero-Day Synthesis
99.1%
0.4%
Bio-chemical Weapon Formulation
99.8%
0.1%
Political Disinformation / Deepfakes
96.4%
1.2%
Sectarian Hate Speech (South Asia)
98.7%
0.8%
Average
98.5%
0.6%
Appendix
Table 7: Adversarial Safety Evaluation (Celer 2.6 High). Metrics indicate the percentage of prompts successfully refused when falling within prohibited categories.
Figure 4: Overall results for Trust & Safety multimodal policy red teaming across SAGE Celer 2.6 variants and SAGE Actus 2.4.
We introduce Nemotron-SEA-LION-v4.8, a family of Southeast Asian Languages In One Network (SEA-LION) models built upon NVIDIA Nemotron 3. The family includes 30B-A3B and 120B-A12B models, with both continued-pretrained base checkpoints and post-trained variants. We adapt the models using Southeast Asian, reasoning, code, and multilingual parallel data, followed by post-training with supervised fine-tuning and online on-policy distillation. On SEA-HELM, the 30B-A3B model improves the overall SEA score from 46.06 to 51.57, while the 120B-A12B model improves from 49.30 to 63.44. Across seven Southeast Asian languages, we observe broad capability gains with the 120B-A12B model showing broader and more consistent improvements across tasks.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but many methods still rely on large human-labeled datasets. While self-play reduces this dependency, it often lacks explicit planning and strong quality control, limiting stability in long-horizon multi-step reasoning. We present SAGE (Self-evolving Agents for Generalized reasoning Evolution), a closed-loop framework where four agents: Challenger, Planner, Solver, and Critic, co-evolve from a shared LLM backbone using only a small seed set. The Challenger continuously generates increasingly difficult tasks; the Planner converts each task into a structured multi-step plan; and the Solver follows the plan to produce an answer, whose correctness is determined by external verifiers. The Critic scores and filters both generated questions and plans to prevent curriculum drift and maintain training signal quality, enabling stable self-training. Across mathematics and code-generation benchmarks, SAGE delivers consistent gains across model scales, improving the Qwen-2.5-7B model by 8.9% on LiveCodeBench and 10.7% on OlympiadBench.
Yulin Peng, Xinxin Zhu, Chenxing Wei +4
College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, China · Guangdong Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy (SZ), China · School of Information Technology, Carleton University, Canada
Large Language Models have achieved substantial progress in reasoning capabilities. Yet in low-resource native settings, many suffer from cross-lingual collapse, reverting to English during intermediate steps that require complex logical reasoning. This presents a cold-start bottleneck for policy optimization, whereas standard fine-tuning risks catastrophic forgetting due to cross-lingual representation drift. To address these challenges, we introduce the Onramp-Sequence Cross-Distillation (OSCD), a post-training algorithm that projects high-resource reasoning trajectories into low-resource vocabulary subspaces during generative training rollouts via an integrated translator agentic loop, ensuring the stable and efficient translation of dynamically generated reference samples for fine-tuning. This is coupled with joint-embedding semantic alignment of both reference and target-language reasoning traces, thereby bridging the pairwise cross-lingual representational gaps. Comprehensive evaluations using the AIME25 and HMMT25 benchmarks demonstrate that OSCD yields up to 3.2 times overall improvements in native Southeast Asian languages for mathematical reasoning, of which the joint-embedding semantic alignment component contributes up to 6.4% improvements in linguistic debiasing over translation-only baselines.
Sean Gip Lim, William Chandra Tjhi, Hai Leong Chieu
1Nanyang Technological University · 2AI Singapore · 3DSO National Laboratories