Automating Crash Diagram Generation Using Vision-Language Models: A Case Study on Multi-Lane Roundabouts

Cooperative autonomous driving requires traffic scene understanding from both vehicle and infrastructure perspectives. While vision-language models (VLMs) show strong general reasoning capabilities, their performance in safety-critical traffic scenarios remains insufficiently evaluated due to the ego-vehicle focus of existing benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we present CrashSight, a large-scale vision-language benchmark for roadway crash understanding using real-world roadside camera data. The dataset comprises 250 crash videos, annotated with 13K multiple-choice question-answer pairs organized under a two-tier taxonomy. Tier 1 evaluates the visual grounding of scene context and involved parties, while Tier 2 probes higher-level reasoning, including crash mechanics, causal attribution, temporal progression, and post-crash outcomes. We benchmark 8 state-of-the-art VLMs and show that, despite strong scene description capabilities, current models struggle with temporal and causal reasoning in safety-critical scenarios. We provide a detailed analysis of failure scenarios and discuss directions for improving VLM crash understanding. The benchmark provides a standardized evaluation framework for infrastructure-assisted perception in cooperative autonomous driving. The CrashSight benchmark, including the full dataset and code, is accessible at https://mcgrche.github.io/crashsight.

As AVs grow in complexity and diversity, identifying the root causes of operational failures has become increasingly complex. The heterogeneity of system architectures across manufacturers, ranging from end-to-end to modular designs, together with variations in algorithms and integration strategies, limits the standardization of incident investigations and hinders systematic safety analysis. This work examines real-world AV incidents reported in the NHTSA database. We curate a dataset of 2,168 cases reported between 2021 and 2025, representing more than 80 million miles driven. To process this data, we introduce CRASH, Cognitive Reasoning Agent for Safety Hazards, an LLM-based agent that automates reasoning over crash reports by leveraging both standardized fields and unstructured narrative descriptions. CRASH operates on a unified representation of each incident to generate concise summaries, attribute a primary cause, and assess whether the AV materially contributed to the event. Our findings show that (1) CRASH attributes 64% of incidents to perception or planning failures, underscoring the importance of reasoning-based analysis for accurate fault attribution; and (2) approximately 50% of reported incidents involve rear-end collisions, highlighting a persistent and unresolved challenge in autonomous driving deployment. We further validate CRASH with five domain experts, achieving 86% accuracy in attributing AV system failures. Overall, CRASH demonstrates strong potential as a scalable and interpretable tool for automated crash analysis, providing actionable insights to support safety research and the continued development of autonomous driving systems.

Assessing the severity of a traffic accident scenario is important to decide which emergency service to dispatch. Missing an ambulance dispatch on a pedestrian accident is a fatal issue that can lead to death. Recently, Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been a promising tool for accident reasoning, yet many VLMs are not grounded in real-life accident response protocols, making them not usable in accident severity assessment off-the-shelf. We introduced DispatchRAG, an accident assessor and dispatcher framework grounded in real-life Japanese traffic-accident response protocols, designed to enhance VLMs to generate an appropriate emergency response during an emergency scenario. Utilizing a RAG-based retrieval mechanism to retrieve the most relevant accident protocol and an LLM-powered reasoner to suggest the most proper response. To support evaluation, we introduce Accident Dispatch Dataset, a comprehensive dataset of accident assessment and emergency response according to Japanese accident response protocols adapted from the MM-AU dataset. We validate our framework on the Accident Dispatch Dataset, showing strong performance across various accident scenarios compared to the baseline VLM, pointing toward integration in autonomous vehicles that can automatically report both their own and nearby accidents.