A Comparative Study on the Impact of Traditional Learning and Interactive Learning on Students' Academic Performance and Emotional Well-Being

The exponential growth of AI education has brought millions of learners to online platforms, yet this massive scale has simultaneously exposed critical pedagogical shortcomings. Traditional video-based instruction, while cost-effective and scalable, demonstrates systematic failures in both sustaining learner engagement and facilitating the deep conceptual mastery essential for AI literacy. We present a pilot study evaluating a novel hybrid learning platform that integrates real-time conversational AI tutors with traditional video lectures. Our controlled experiment (N = 58, mean age M = 21.4, SD = 2.8) compared traditional video-based instruction with our AI-augmented video platform. This study employed a sequential within-subjects design where all participants first completed the traditional video condition followed by the AI-augmented condition, providing direct comparisons of learning outcomes. We measured learning effectiveness through immediate post-tests and delayed retention assessments (2-week delay). Results suggest improvements in learning performance: immediate post-test performance showed a large effect size (d = 1.505) with participants scoring 8.3 points higher after AI-augmented instruction (91.8 vs 83.5 out of 100, p < .001). Behavioral analytics revealed increased engagement duration (71.1% improvement with AI tutoring) in the experimental group. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that conversational AI tutors may enhance traditional educational delivery, suggesting a potential avenue for developing scalable, adaptive learning systems.

This study presents high-throughput, real-time multi-agent affective computing framework designed to enhance classroom learning through emotional state monitoring. As large classroom sizes and limited teacher student interaction increasingly challenge educators, there is a growing need for scalable, data-driven tools capable of capturing students' emotional and engagement patterns in real time. The system was evaluated using the Classroom Emotion Dataset, consisting of 1,500 labeled images and 300 classroom detection videos. Tailored for IoT devices, the system addresses load balancing and latency challenges through efficient real-time processing. Field testing was conducted across three educational institutions in a large metropolitan area: a primary school (hereafter school A), a secondary school (school B), and a high school (school C). The system demonstrated robust performance, detecting up to 50 faces at 25 FPS and achieving 88% overall accuracy in classifying classroom engagement states. Implementation results showed positive outcomes, with favorable feedback from students, teachers, and parents regarding improved classroom interaction and teaching adaptation. Key contributions of this research include establishing a practical, IoT-based framework for emotion-aware learning environments and introducing the 'Classroom Emotion Dataset' to facilitate further validation and research.

Interactive systems such as chatbots and games are increasingly used to persuade and educate on sustainability-related topics, yet it remains unclear how different delivery formats shape learning and persuasive outcomes when content is held constant. Grounding on identical arguments and factual content across conditions, we present a controlled user study comparing three modes of information delivery: static essays, conversational chatbots, and narrative text-based games. Across subjective measures, the chatbot condition consistently outperformed the other modes and increased perceived importance of the topic. However, perceived learning did not reliably align with objective outcomes: participants in the text-based game condition reported learning less than those reading essays, yet achieved higher scores on a delayed (24-hour) knowledge quiz. Additional exploratory analyses further suggest that common engagement proxies, such as verbosity and interaction length, are more closely related to subjective experience than to actual learning. These findings highlight a dissociation between how persuasive experiences feel and what participants retain, and point to important design trade-offs between interactivity, realism, and learning in persuasive systems and serious games.